[PATCH v7 17/47] dt-bindings: memory: tegra20: Add memory client IDs

Thierry Reding thierry.reding at gmail.com
Thu Nov 26 17:59:43 UTC 2020


On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 18:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 06:26:05PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:48:53PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > > > Each memory client has unique hardware ID, add these IDs.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx at gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/dt-bindings/memory/tegra20-mc.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Is there any chance you could drop these dt-bindings include patches
> > > (17, 18 and 19) so that I can pick them up into the Tegra tree? The
> > > device tree changes that I was going to pick up depend on this and
> > > fail to build if applied as-is.
> > >
> > > I was looking at your linux-mem-ctrl tree and had initially thought I
> > > could just pull in one of the branches to get these dependencies, but it
> > > looks like the dt-bindings patches are on the for-v5.11/tegra-mc branch,
> > > which the ARM SoC maintainers wouldn't like to see me pull in for a
> > > dependency on device tree changes.
> >
> > Partially you answered here. :) Since you should not pull my branch into
> > a DT branch, you also should not put these include/dt-bindings patches
> > there.  SoC guys will complain about this as well.
> >
> > These patches are also needed for the driver, so if you take them, I
> > would need them back in a pull request. SoC folks could spot it as well
> > and point that such merge should not happen.
> 
> It seems I was wrong - these patches are not needed for the driver
> code. Neither in applied parts nor in upcoming Dmitry's work. In such
> case I could rework my branches and send a new pull request. The
> patches would stay only in your tree.

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that the driver doesn't actually need
these. I'll take your Acked-bys and put these three patches into the
Tegra tree, then.

Thanks,
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20201126/c08fc443/attachment.sig>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list