[PATCH v2 17/17] drm/i915: Properly request PCI BARs
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Fri Oct 9 10:01:39 UTC 2020
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:47 AM Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:59:34AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > When trying to test my CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM changes I realized they
> > do nothing for i915. Because i915 doesn't request any regions, like
> > pretty much all drm pci drivers. I guess this is some very old
> > remnants from the userspace modesetting days, when we wanted to
> > co-exist with the fbdev driver. Which usually requested these
> > resources.
> >
> > But makes me wonder why the pci subsystem doesn't just request
> > resource automatically when we map a bar and a pci driver is bound?
> >
> > Knowledge about which pci bars we need kludged together from
> > intel_uncore.c and intel_gtt.c from i915 and intel-gtt.c over in the
> > fake agp driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams at intel.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams at intel.com>
> > Cc: linux-mm at kvack.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-media at vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
> > Cc: linux-pci at vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > index 54e201fdeba4..ce39049d8919 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > @@ -1692,10 +1692,13 @@ static int uncore_mmio_setup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = i915->drm.pdev;
> > int mmio_bar;
> > int mmio_size;
> > + int bar_selection;
>
> Signed bitmasks always make me uneasy. But looks like
> that's what it is in the pci api. So meh.
Yeah it's surprising.
> > + int ret;
> >
> > mmio_bar = IS_GEN(i915, 2) ? 1 : 0;
> > + bar_selection = BIT (2) | BIT(mmio_bar);
> ^
> spurious space
>
> That's also not correct for gen2 I think.
>
> gen2:
> 0 = GMADR
> 1 = MMADR
> 2 = IOBAR
>
> gen3:
> 0 = MMADR
> 1 = IOBAR
> 2 = GMADR
> 3 = GTTADR
>
> gen4+:
> 0+1 = GTTMMADR
> 2+3 = GMADR
> 4 = IOBAR
>
> Maybe we should just have an explicit list of bars like that in a
> comment?
>
> I'd also suggest sucking this bitmask calculation into a small helper
> so you can reuse it for the release.
tbh I just hacked this up for testing. Given how almost no other drm
driver does this, I'm wondering whether we should or not.
Also the only reason why I didn't just use the pci_request_regions
helper is to avoid the vga ioport range, since that's managed by
vgaarbiter.
So I think if we go for this for real we should:
- register the vga ioport range in the vgaarbiter
- have a pci_request_iomem_regions helper that grabs all mem bars
- roll that out to all drm pci drivers
Or something like that. The other complication is when we resize the
iobar. So not really sure what to do here.
-Daniel
>
> > /*
> > - * Before gen4, the registers and the GTT are behind different BARs.
> > + * On gen3 the registers and the GTT are behind different BARs.
> > * However, from gen4 onwards, the registers and the GTT are shared
> > * in the same BAR, so we want to restrict this ioremap from
> > * clobbering the GTT which we want ioremap_wc instead. Fortunately,
> > @@ -1703,6 +1706,8 @@ static int uncore_mmio_setup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> > * generations up to Ironlake.
> > * For dgfx chips register range is expanded to 4MB.
> > */
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 3)
> > + bar_selection |= BIT(3);
> > if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 5)
> > mmio_size = 512 * 1024;
> > else if (IS_DGFX(i915))
> > @@ -1710,8 +1715,15 @@ static int uncore_mmio_setup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> > else
> > mmio_size = 2 * 1024 * 1024;
> >
> > + ret = pci_request_selected_regions(pdev, bar_selection, "i915");
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + drm_err(&i915->drm, "failed to request pci bars\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > uncore->regs = pci_iomap(pdev, mmio_bar, mmio_size);
> > if (uncore->regs == NULL) {
> > + pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, bar_selection);
> > drm_err(&i915->drm, "failed to map registers\n");
> > return -EIO;
> > }
> > @@ -1721,9 +1733,18 @@ static int uncore_mmio_setup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> >
> > static void uncore_mmio_cleanup(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> > {
> > - struct pci_dev *pdev = uncore->i915->drm.pdev;
> > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uncore->i915;
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = i915->drm.pdev;
> > + int mmio_bar;
> > + int bar_selection;
> > +
> > + mmio_bar = IS_GEN(i915, 2) ? 1 : 0;
> > + bar_selection = BIT (2) | BIT(mmio_bar);
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 3)
> > + bar_selection |= BIT(3);
> >
> > pci_iounmap(pdev, uncore->regs);
> > + pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, bar_selection);
> > }
> >
> > void intel_uncore_init_early(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list