[PATCH v2 00/11] amd/display: Add GFX9+ modifier support.

Bas Nieuwenhuizen bas at basnieuwenhuizen.nl
Mon Sep 7 11:11:09 UTC 2020


On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:51 AM Ernst Sjöstrand <ernstp at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Den fre 4 sep. 2020 kl 18:07 skrev Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas at basnieuwenhuizen.nl>:
>>
>> This adds modifier support to radeonsi.
>
>
> Wouldn't it be more correct to say that this adds modifier support to amdgpu (and enables it to work with radeonsi OpenGL)
> or something like that?

Yep, this was copy pasted from the userspace MR ...

>
> //E
>
>>
>> It has been tested on
>>
>> - VEGA10, RAVEN, NAVI14
>> - weston, sway, X with xf86-video-amdgpu (i.e. legacy path still works)
>>
>> and includes some basic testing of the layout code.
>>
>> The main goal is to keep it somewhat simple and regression free, so
>> on the display side this series only exposes what the current GPU
>> can render to. While we could expose more I think that is more
>> suitable for follow-up work as the benefit would be minimal and
>> there are some more design discussion there to discuss that are
>> orthogonal from the initial implementation.
>>
>> Similarly this series only exposes 32-bpp displayable DCC in the cases
>> that radeonsi would use it and any extra capabilities here should be
>> future work.
>>
>> I believe these are by far the most complicated modifiers we've seen
>> up till now, mostly related to
>>
>> - GPU identification for cases where it matters wrt tiling.
>> - Every generation having tiling layout changes
>> - Compression settings.
>>
>> I believe the complexity is necessary as every layout should be different
>> and all layouts should be the best in some situation (though not all
>> combinations of GPU parameters will actually have an existing GPU).
>>
>> That said, on the render side the number of modifiers actually listed for
>> a given GPU is ~10, and in the current implementation that is the same
>> for the display side. (we could expose more actually differing layouts
>> on the display side for cross-GPU compatibility, but I consider that
>> out of scope for this initial work).
>>
>> This series can be found on
>> https://github.com/BNieuwenhuizen/linux/tree/modifiers
>>
>> An userspace implementation in radeonsi can be found on
>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6176
>>
>> v2:
>>
>> Per suggestion from Daniel Vetter I added logic to get the tiling_flags at
>> addfb2 time and convert them into modifiers for GFX9+.  Furthermore, the DCC
>> constant econding modifers only get exposed on RAVEN2 and newer.
>>
>> Bas Nieuwenhuizen (11):
>>   drm/amd/display: Do not silently accept DCC for multiplane formats.
>>   drm/amd: Init modifier field of helper fb.
>>   drm/amd/display: Honor the offset for plane 0.
>>   drm/fourcc:  Add AMD DRM modifiers.
>>   drm/amd/display: Store tiling_flags in the framebuffer.
>>   drm/amd/display: Convert tiling_flags to modifiers.
>>   drm/amd/display: Refactor surface tiling setup.
>>   drm/amd/display: Set DC options from modifiers.
>>   drm/amd/display: Add formats for DCC with 2/3 planes.
>>   drm/amd/display: Expose modifiers.
>>   drm/amd/display: Clean up GFX9 tiling_flags path.
>>
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c   | 169 +++-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fb.c        |   2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h      |   3 +
>>  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 754 ++++++++++++++----
>>  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h |   2 -
>>  include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h                 | 115 +++
>>  6 files changed, 880 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.28.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


More information about the dri-devel mailing list