[PATCH] drm: rcar-du: Put reference to VSP device
Kieran Bingham
kieran.bingham+renesas at ideasonboard.com
Wed Sep 16 10:26:36 UTC 2020
Hi Laurent,
On 16/09/2020 00:38, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The reference to the VSP device acquired with of_find_device_by_node()
> in rcar_du_vsp_init() is never released. Fix it with a drmm action,
> which gets run both in the probe error path and in the remove path.
>
> Fixes: 6d62ef3ac30b ("drm: rcar-du: Expose the VSP1 compositor through KMS planes")
> Reported-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3 at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas at ideasonboard.com>
Looks nice and clean!
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c
> index f1a81c9b184d..fa09b3ae8b9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <drm/drm_fourcc.h>
> #include <drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_gem_framebuffer_helper.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> #include <drm/drm_plane_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_vblank.h>
>
> @@ -341,6 +342,13 @@ static const struct drm_plane_funcs rcar_du_vsp_plane_funcs = {
> .atomic_destroy_state = rcar_du_vsp_plane_atomic_destroy_state,
> };
>
> +static void rcar_du_vsp_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev, void *res)
> +{
> + struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp = res;
> +
> + put_device(vsp->vsp);
Ugh the asymmetry of the put_device is a bit annoying, because it's not
initially clear that the of_find_device_by_node() call 'gets' a reference.
(Or at least not until you find:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/731284/)
It is stated in the commit message though so that's fine, and although I
thought perhaps a comment here might be useful to declare that it
releases the reference taken by of_find_device_by_node(), I'm not sure
it even adds that much value ... so either way.
> +}
> +
> int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
> unsigned int crtcs)
> {
> @@ -357,6 +365,10 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
>
> vsp->vsp = &pdev->dev;
>
> + ret = drmm_add_action(rcdu->ddev, rcar_du_vsp_cleanup, vsp);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = vsp1_du_init(vsp->vsp);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list