[PATCH -next] dma-buf: heaps: Remove unused variable ret
Sumit Semwal
sumit.semwal at linaro.org
Tue Sep 22 14:51:42 UTC 2020
Hello Zou,
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 18:12, Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>
> Am 22.09.20 um 09:53 schrieb Zou Wei:
> > This patch fixes below warnings reported by coccicheck
> >
> > ./drivers/dma-buf/heaps/heap-helpers.c:202:5-8: Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "0" on line 215
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei at huawei.com>
>
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>
> Going to pick this up for drm-misc-next.
Thanks Christian!
Fwiw, feel free to add my
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal at linaro.org>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma-buf/heaps/heap-helpers.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/heap-helpers.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/heap-helpers.c
> > index d0696cf..7969510 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/heap-helpers.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/heap-helpers.c
> > @@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ static int dma_heap_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > {
> > struct heap_helper_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv;
> > struct dma_heaps_attachment *a;
> > - int ret = 0;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
> >
> > @@ -212,7 +211,7 @@ static int dma_heap_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock);
> >
> > - return ret;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int dma_heap_dma_buf_end_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>
Best,
Sumit.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list