[PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 bindings

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Marek,

Thank you for the patch.

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:31:21AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add DT binding document for TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 DSI to LVDS bridge.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
> Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd at chromium.org>
> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> ---
> V2: Add compatible string for SN65DSI84, since this is now tested on it
> ---
>  .../bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml | 134 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 134 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..42d11b46a1eb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 DSI to LVDS bridge chip
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> +
> +description: |
> +  Texas Instruments SN65DSI83 1x Single-link MIPI DSI
> +  to 1x Single-link LVDS
> +  https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/sn65dsi83
> +  Texas Instruments SN65DSI84 1x Single-link MIPI DSI
> +  to 1x Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
> +  https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/sn65dsi84
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - const: ti,sn65dsi83
> +      - const: ti,sn65dsi84
> +
> +  reg:
> +    const: 0x2d
> +
> +  enable-gpios:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description: GPIO specifier for bridge_en pin (active high).
> +
> +  ports:
> +    type: object

Could you use the OF graph schema, now that it is available ? There
should be plenty of examples in bindings, both in display and in media.
You will be able to drop quite a bit of boilerplate.

> +    additionalProperties: false
> +
> +    properties:
> +      "#address-cells":
> +        const: 1
> +
> +      "#size-cells":
> +        const: 0
> +
> +      port at 0:
> +        type: object
> +        additionalProperties: false
> +
> +        description:
> +          Video port for MIPI DSI input
> +
> +        properties:
> +          reg:
> +            const: 0
> +
> +          endpoint:
> +            type: object
> +            additionalProperties: false
> +            properties:
> +              remote-endpoint: true
> +              data-lanes:
> +                description: array of physical DSI data lane indexes.
> +
> +        required:
> +          - reg
> +
> +      port at 1:
> +        type: object
> +        additionalProperties: false
> +
> +        description:
> +          Video port for LVDS output (panel or bridge).
> +
> +        properties:
> +          reg:
> +            const: 1
> +
> +          endpoint:
> +            type: object
> +            additionalProperties: false
> +            properties:
> +              remote-endpoint: true
> +
> +        required:
> +          - reg
> +
> +    required:
> +      - "#address-cells"
> +      - "#size-cells"
> +      - port at 0
> +      - port at 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - enable-gpios
> +  - ports
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +
> +    i2c {
> +      #address-cells = <1>;
> +      #size-cells = <0>;

While not a hard rule, it's customary to indent DT examples with 4
spaces. I find it to increase readability, but if you feel otherwise,
that's OK.

> +
> +      bridge at 2d {
> +        compatible = "ti,sn65dsi83";
> +        reg = <0x2d>;
> +
> +        enable-gpios = <&gpio2 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +
> +        ports {
> +          #address-cells = <1>;
> +          #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +          port at 0 {
> +            reg = <0>;
> +            endpoint {
> +              remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_out>;
> +              data-lanes = <1 2 3 4>;
> +            };
> +          };
> +
> +          port at 1 {
> +            reg = <1>;
> +            endpoint {
> +              remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_lvds>;
> +            };
> +          };
> +        };
> +      };
> +    };

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart