[PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 bindings

[Marek Vasut]

On 4/22/21 10:38 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
[...]
>> +      port at 1:
>> +        type: object
>> +        additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +        description:
>> +          Video port for LVDS output (panel or bridge).
>> +
>> +        properties:
>> +          reg:
>> +            const: 1
>> +
>> +          endpoint:
>> +            type: object
>> +            additionalProperties: false
>> +            properties:
>> +              remote-endpoint: true
> 
> Similar to Jagan's serie, would be great to add bindings for the dual-link LVDS even if not supported
> by the driver (the driver can fails with a verbose error).

I don't want to add any sort of bindings which I cannot validate against 
real hardware. I would argue that adding the 2x single / dual link LVDS 
DT property could be added when someone has a need for it and can test 
it on real hardware, and such a binding should be simple develop and 
add. And that is better, because we won't end up with some possibly 
misdesigned untested DT binding which would become part of the ABI and 
would have to be supported forever.