[PATCH V2 2/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 driver
Frieder Schrempf
frieder.schrempf at kontron.de
Wed Apr 28 07:51:32 UTC 2021
On 22.04.21 00:31, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
> and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
> bridge. TI SN65DSI85 is unsupported due to lack of hardware to test on,
> but easy to add.
>
> The driver operates the chip via I2C bus. Currently the LVDS clock are
> always derived from DSI clock lane, which is the usual mode of operation.
> Support for clock from external oscillator is not implemented, but it is
> easy to add if ever needed. Only RGB888 pixel format is implemented, the
> LVDS666 is not supported, but could be added if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
> Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> Cc: Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker at toradex.com>
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd at chromium.org>
> Cc: Valentin Raevsky <valentin at compulab.co.il>
> To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Tested-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain at linaro.org>
> ---
> V2: - Use dev_err_probe()
> - Set REG_RC_RESET as volatile
> - Wait for PLL stabilization by polling REG_RC_LVDS_PLL
> - Use ctx->mode = *adj instead of *mode in sn65dsi83_mode_set
> - Add tested DSI84 support in dual-link mode
> - Correctly set VCOM
> - Fill in missing DSI CHB and LVDS CHB bits from DSI84 and DSI85
> datasheets, with that all the reserved bits make far more sense
> as the DSI83 and DSI84 seems to be reduced version of DSI85
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 617 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 628 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
>
[...]
> +static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> + enum sn65dsi83_model model;
> + struct sn65dsi83 *ctx;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ctx->dev = dev;
> +
> + if (dev->of_node)
> + model = (enum sn65dsi83_model)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + else
> + model = id->driver_data;
> +
> + /* Default to dual-link LVDS on all but DSI83. */
> + if (model != MODEL_SN65DSI83)
> + ctx->lvds_dual_link = true;
What if I use the DSI84 with a single link LVDS? I can't see any way to
configure that right now.
> +
> + ctx->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(ctx->dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->enable_gpio))
> + return PTR_ERR(ctx->enable_gpio);
> +
> + ret = sn65dsi83_parse_dt(ctx);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ctx->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &sn65dsi83_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->regmap))
> + return PTR_ERR(ctx->regmap);
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, ctx);
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, ctx);
> +
> + ctx->bridge.funcs = &sn65dsi83_funcs;
> + ctx->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node;
> + drm_bridge_add(&ctx->bridge);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list