[PATCH 20/46] drm/i915/guc: Add hang check to GuC submit engine
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Aug 10 09:18:20 UTC 2021
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 07:05:58PM +0000, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 05:35:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 03:29:17PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > The heartbeat uses a single instance of a GuC submit engine (GSE) to do
> > > the hang check. As such if a different GSE's state machine hangs, the
> > > heartbeat cannot detect this hang. Add timer to each GSE which in turn
> > > can disable all submissions if it is hung.
> > >
> > > Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > .../i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h | 3 ++
> > > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > index afb9b4bb8971..2d8296bcc583 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > > @@ -105,15 +105,21 @@ static bool tasklet_blocked(struct guc_submit_engine *gse)
> > > return test_bit(GSE_STATE_TASKLET_BLOCKED, &gse->flags);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/* 2 seconds seems like a reasonable timeout waiting for a G2H */
> > > +#define MAX_TASKLET_BLOCKED_NS 2000000000
> > > static void set_tasklet_blocked(struct guc_submit_engine *gse)
> > > {
> > > lockdep_assert_held(&gse->sched_engine.lock);
> > > + hrtimer_start_range_ns(&gse->hang_timer,
> > > + ns_to_ktime(MAX_TASKLET_BLOCKED_NS), 0,
> > > + HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
> > > set_bit(GSE_STATE_TASKLET_BLOCKED, &gse->flags);
> >
> > So with drm/scheduler the reset handling is assumed to be
> > single-threaded, and there's quite complex rules around that. I've
> > recently worked with Boris Brezillion to clarify all this a bit and
> > improve docs. Does this all still work in that glorious future? Might be
> > good to at least sprinkle some comments/thoughts around in the commit
> > message about the envisaged future direction for all this stuff, to keep
> > people in the loop. Especially future people.
> >
> > Ofc plan is still to just largely land all this.
> >
> > Also: set_bit is an unordered atomic, which means you need barriers, which
> > meanes ... *insert the full rant about justifying/documenting lockless
> > algorithms from earlier *
> >
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&gse->sched_engine.lock);
>
> Not lockless. Also spin locks act as barriers, right?
Well if that spinlock is protecting that bit then that's good, but then it
shouldn't be an atomic set_bit. In that case:
- either make the entire bitfield non-atomic so it's clear there's boring
dumb locking going on
- or split out your new bit into a separate field so that there's no false
sharing with the existing bitfield state machinery, and add a kernel doc
to that field explaining the locking
set_bit itself is atomic and unordered, so means you need barriers and all
that. If you don't have a lockless algorithm, don't use atomic bitops to
avoid confusing readers because set_bit/test_bit sets of all the warning
bells.
And yes it's annoying that for bitops the atomic ones don't have an
atomic_ prefix. The non-atomic ones have a __ prefix. This is honestly why
I don't think we should use bitfields as much as we do, because the main
use-case for them is when you have bitfields which are longer than 64bits.
They come from the cpumask world, and linux supports a lot of cpus.
Open-coding non-atomic simple bitfields with the usual C operators is
perfectly fine and legible imo. But that part is maybe more a bikeshed.
> > But I think this all falls out with the removal of the guc-id allocation
> > scheme?
>
> Yes, this patch is getting deleted.
That works too :-)
-Daniel
>
> Matt
>
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void __clr_tasklet_blocked(struct guc_submit_engine *gse)
> > > {
> > > lockdep_assert_held(&gse->sched_engine.lock);
> > > + hrtimer_cancel(&gse->hang_timer);
> > > clear_bit(GSE_STATE_TASKLET_BLOCKED, &gse->flags);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1028,6 +1034,7 @@ static void disable_submission(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > > if (__tasklet_is_enabled(&sched_engine->tasklet)) {
> > > GEM_BUG_ON(!guc->ct.enabled);
> > > __tasklet_disable_sync_once(&sched_engine->tasklet);
> > > + hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&guc->gse[i]->hang_timer);
> > > sched_engine->tasklet.callback = NULL;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > @@ -3750,6 +3757,33 @@ static void guc_sched_engine_destroy(struct kref *kref)
> > > kfree(gse);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static enum hrtimer_restart gse_hang(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
> > > +{
> > > + struct guc_submit_engine *gse =
> > > + container_of(hrtimer, struct guc_submit_engine, hang_timer);
> > > + struct intel_guc *guc = gse->sched_engine.private_data;
> > > +
> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
> > > + if (guc->gse_hang_expected)
> > > + drm_dbg(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> > > + "GSE[%i] hung, disabling submission", gse->id);
> > > + else
> > > + drm_err(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> > > + "GSE[%i] hung, disabling submission", gse->id);
> > > +#else
> > > + drm_err(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> > > + "GSE[%i] hung, disabling submission", gse->id);
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Tasklet not making forward progress, disable submission which in turn
> > > + * will kick in the heartbeat to do a full GPU reset.
> > > + */
> > > + disable_submission(guc);
> > > +
> > > + return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void guc_submit_engine_init(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > struct guc_submit_engine *gse,
> > > int id)
> > > @@ -3767,6 +3801,8 @@ static void guc_submit_engine_init(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > > sched_engine->retire_inflight_request_prio =
> > > guc_retire_inflight_request_prio;
> > > sched_engine->private_data = guc;
> > > + hrtimer_init(&gse->hang_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> > > + gse->hang_timer.function = gse_hang;
> > > gse->id = id;
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h
> > > index a5933e07bdd2..eae2e9725ede 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> > > #ifndef _INTEL_GUC_SUBMISSION_TYPES_H_
> > > #define _INTEL_GUC_SUBMISSION_TYPES_H_
> > >
> > > +#include <linux/xarray.h>
> > > +
> > > #include "gt/intel_engine_types.h"
> > > #include "gt/intel_context_types.h"
> > > #include "i915_scheduler_types.h"
> > > @@ -41,6 +43,7 @@ struct guc_submit_engine {
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > > int total_num_rq_with_no_guc_id;
> > > atomic_t num_guc_ids_not_ready;
> > > + struct hrtimer hang_timer;
> > > int id;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > --
> > > 2.28.0
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list