Why we didn't use embedded gem object for virtio gpu when making ttm bo a gem bo subclass?
lepton
ytht.net at gmail.com
Fri Aug 13 19:42:51 UTC 2021
Hi Gerd,
We found a bug in 5.4 kernel and virtgpu_gem_prime_mmap doesn't work
because it references vma_node in gem_base object while ttm code
initialized vma_node in tbo.base object. I am wondering, in your
original serial:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20190805124310.3275-1-kraxel@redhat.com/
(drm/ttm: make ttm bo a gem bo subclass), why you changed to use
embedded gem object for most gpu drivers but skipping virtio gpu? Is
there some specific reason?
I am thinking about CL like this (http://crrev.com/c/3092457) to fix
it and not sure if I missed something.
Thanks for your help!
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list