[PATCH 3/4] drm/amdgpu: drm/amdgpu: Handle IOMMU enabled case
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Wed Aug 25 06:43:33 UTC 2021
Am 24.08.21 um 23:01 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
> Handle all DMA IOMMU group related dependencies before the
> group is removed and we try to access it after free.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 0b5764aa98a4..288a465b8101 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -3860,6 +3860,8 @@ void amdgpu_device_fini_hw(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>
> amdgpu_device_ip_fini_early(adev);
>
> + amdgpu_ttm_clear_dma_mappings(adev);
> +
> amdgpu_gart_dummy_page_fini(adev);
>
> amdgpu_device_unmap_mmio(adev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> index 446943e32e3e..f73d807db3b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
> static int amdgpu_ttm_backend_bind(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> struct ttm_tt *ttm,
> struct ttm_resource *bo_mem);
> +
> static void amdgpu_ttm_backend_unbind(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> struct ttm_tt *ttm);
>
> @@ -2293,6 +2294,55 @@ static ssize_t amdgpu_iomem_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
> return result;
> }
>
> +void amdgpu_ttm_clear_dma_mappings(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
I strongly think that this function should be part of TTM. Something
like ttm_device_force_unpopulate.
> +{
> + struct ttm_device *bdev = &adev->mman.bdev;
> + struct ttm_resource_manager *man;
> + struct ttm_buffer_object *bo;
> + unsigned int i, j;
> +
> + spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + for (i = TTM_PL_SYSTEM; i < TTM_NUM_MEM_TYPES; ++i) {
> + man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, i);
> + if (!man || !man->use_tt)
> + continue;
> +
> + while (!list_empty(&man->pinned)) {
> + bo = list_first_entry(&man->pinned, struct ttm_buffer_object, lru);
> + /* Take ref against racing releases once lru_lock is unlocked */
> + ttm_bo_get(bo);
> + list_del_init(&bo->lru);
> + spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> +
> + if (bo->ttm) {
> + amdgpu_ttm_backend_unbind(bo->bdev, bo->ttm);
> + ttm_tt_destroy_common(bo->bdev, bo->ttm);
Then you can also cleanly use ttm_tt_unpopulate here, cause this will
result in incorrect statistics inside TTM atm.
Regards,
Christian.
> + }
> +
> + ttm_bo_put(bo);
> + spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + }
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++j) {
> + while (!list_empty(&man->lru[j])) {
> + bo = list_first_entry(&man->lru[j], struct ttm_buffer_object, lru);
> + ttm_bo_get(bo);
> + list_del_init(&bo->lru);
> + spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> +
> + if (bo->ttm) {
> + amdgpu_ttm_backend_unbind(bo->bdev, bo->ttm);
> + ttm_tt_destroy_common(bo->bdev, bo->ttm);
> + }
> + ttm_bo_put(bo);
> + spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> +
> +}
> +
> static const struct file_operations amdgpu_ttm_iomem_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .read = amdgpu_iomem_read,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
> index e69f3e8e06e5..02c8eac48a64 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ bool amdgpu_ttm_tt_is_readonly(struct ttm_tt *ttm);
> uint64_t amdgpu_ttm_tt_pde_flags(struct ttm_tt *ttm, struct ttm_resource *mem);
> uint64_t amdgpu_ttm_tt_pte_flags(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct ttm_tt *ttm,
> struct ttm_resource *mem);
> +void amdgpu_ttm_clear_dma_mappings(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>
> void amdgpu_ttm_debugfs_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list