[PATCH 3/3] drm/panfrost: Stay in the threaded MMU IRQ handler until we've handled all IRQs
Steven Price
steven.price at arm.com
Mon Feb 1 13:24:00 UTC 2021
On 01/02/2021 12:59, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:13:49 +0000
> Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/02/2021 08:21, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>> Doing a hw-irq -> threaded-irq round-trip is counter-productive, stay
>>> in the threaded irq handler as long as we can.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at collabora.com>
>>
>> Looks fine to me, but I'm interested to know if you actually saw a
>> performance improvement. Back-to-back MMU faults should (hopefully) be
>> fairly uncommon.
>
> I actually didn't check the perf improvement or the actual number of
> back-to-back MMU faults, but
> dEQP-GLES31.functional.draw_indirect.compute_interop.large.drawelements_combined_grid_1000x1000_drawcount_5000
> seemed to generate a few of those, so I thought it'd be good to
> optimize that case given how trivial it is.
Fair enough! I was just a little concerned that Panfrost was somehow
provoking enough interrupts that this was a measurable performance
improvement.
I assume you'll push these to drm-misc-next (/fixes) as appropriate.
Thanks,
Steve
>>
>> Regardless:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com>
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c | 7 +++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
>>> index 21e552d1ac71..65bc20628c4e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
>>> @@ -580,6 +580,8 @@ static irqreturn_t panfrost_mmu_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *data)
>>> u32 status = mmu_read(pfdev, MMU_INT_RAWSTAT);
>>> int i, ret;
>>>
>>> +again:
>>> +
>>> for (i = 0; status; i++) {
>>> u32 mask = BIT(i) | BIT(i + 16);
>>> u64 addr;
>>> @@ -628,6 +630,11 @@ static irqreturn_t panfrost_mmu_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *data)
>>> status &= ~mask;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /* If we received new MMU interrupts, process them before returning. */
>>> + status = mmu_read(pfdev, MMU_INT_RAWSTAT);
>>> + if (status)
>>> + goto again;
>>> +
>>> mmu_write(pfdev, MMU_INT_MASK, ~0);
>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> };
>>>
>>
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list