[PATCH] drm/fourcc: introduce DRM_FOURCC_STANDALONE guard
Emil Velikov
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 14:13:30 UTC 2021
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 13:47, Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, February 3rd, 2021 at 12:03 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No issue then, great. Let's merge this trivial solution and move on to
> > other things.
>
> Just because one compositor isn't affected isn't an excuse for the
> kernel to force its users to use a specific C standard.
As said before, there are multiple ways to handle this _without_
introducing yet another UAPI header. I don't see why you're dismissing
all of them, can you elaborate?
Thanks
Emil
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list