[PATCH] radeon: added support for 2560x1080 resolution
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 16:44:44 UTC 2021
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 1:13 PM Marcin Raszka <djraszit at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was wondering why I can't set the resolution to 2560x1080,
> while in windows 7 I can without a problem. I looked at the radeon driver
> code and found it doesn't support this resolution. So I made some changes. I
> added the hdmi_mhz parameter. In cmdline I set radeon.hdmi_mhz=190
> Only tested on the Radeon HD 5830
>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c | 25 +++++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_encoders.c | 6 ++++--
> 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c
> index ac9a5ec481c3..c283b6b15925 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
> #define RADEON_BENCHMARK_COPY_DMA 0
>
> #define RADEON_BENCHMARK_ITERATIONS 1024
> -#define RADEON_BENCHMARK_COMMON_MODES_N 17
> +#define RADEON_BENCHMARK_COMMON_MODES_N 18
>
> static int radeon_benchmark_do_move(struct radeon_device *rdev, unsigned size,
> uint64_t saddr, uint64_t daddr,
> @@ -184,7 +184,8 @@ void radeon_benchmark(struct radeon_device *rdev, int test_number)
> 1680 * 1050 * 4,
> 1600 * 1200 * 4,
> 1920 * 1080 * 4,
> - 1920 * 1200 * 4
> + 1920 * 1200 * 4,
> + 2560 * 1080 * 4
> };
>
This change is unrelated.
> switch (test_number) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
> index 607ad5620bd9..182f1e364cbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/vga_switcheroo.h>
>
> +extern int hdmimhz;
> +
> static int radeon_dp_handle_hpd(struct drm_connector *connector)
> {
> struct radeon_connector *radeon_connector = to_radeon_connector(connector);
> @@ -503,7 +505,7 @@ static void radeon_add_common_modes(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_conn
> struct mode_size {
> int w;
> int h;
> - } common_modes[17] = {
> + } common_modes[] = {
> { 640, 480},
> { 720, 480},
> { 800, 600},
> @@ -520,10 +522,11 @@ static void radeon_add_common_modes(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_conn
> {1680, 1050},
> {1600, 1200},
> {1920, 1080},
> - {1920, 1200}
> + {1920, 1200},
> + {2560, 1080}
> };
>
> - for (i = 0; i < 17; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(common_modes); i++) {
> if (radeon_encoder->devices & (ATOM_DEVICE_TV_SUPPORT)) {
> if (common_modes[i].w > 1024 ||
> common_modes[i].h > 768)
Same with these changes.
> @@ -1491,25 +1494,27 @@ static enum drm_mode_status radeon_dvi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connecto
> (mode->clock > 135000))
> return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>
> - if (radeon_connector->use_digital && (mode->clock > 165000)) {
> + if (radeon_connector->use_digital && (mode->clock > (hdmimhz * 1000))) {
> if ((radeon_connector->connector_object_id == CONNECTOR_OBJECT_ID_DUAL_LINK_DVI_I) ||
> (radeon_connector->connector_object_id == CONNECTOR_OBJECT_ID_DUAL_LINK_DVI_D) ||
> - (radeon_connector->connector_object_id == CONNECTOR_OBJECT_ID_HDMI_TYPE_B))
> + (radeon_connector->connector_object_id == CONNECTOR_OBJECT_ID_HDMI_TYPE_B)){
> return MODE_OK;
> - else if (ASIC_IS_DCE6(rdev) && drm_detect_hdmi_monitor(radeon_connector_edid(connector))) {
> + }else if (ASIC_IS_DCE6(rdev) && drm_detect_hdmi_monitor(radeon_connector_edid(connector))) {
> /* HDMI 1.3+ supports max clock of 340 Mhz */
> - if (mode->clock > 340000)
> + if (mode->clock > 340000){
> return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> - else
> + }else{
> return MODE_OK;
> + }
> } else {
> return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> }
> }
>
> /* check against the max pixel clock */
> - if ((mode->clock / 10) > rdev->clock.max_pixel_clock)
> + if ((mode->clock / 10) > rdev->clock.max_pixel_clock){
> return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> + }
Unrelated whitespace change.
>
> return MODE_OK;
> }
> @@ -1809,7 +1814,7 @@ static enum drm_mode_status radeon_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector
> if (mode->clock > 340000)
> return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> } else {
> - if (mode->clock > 165000)
> + if (mode->clock > (hdmimhz * 1000))
> return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
> index e45d7344ac2b..fce8f9ab8018 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,11 @@ int radeon_cik_support = 1;
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(cik_support, "CIK support (1 = enabled (default), 0 = disabled)");
> module_param_named(cik_support, radeon_cik_support, int, 0444);
>
> +int hdmimhz = 165;
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(hdmi_mhz, "set HDMI max frequency, default is 165");
> +module_param_named(hdmi_mhz, hdmimhz, int, 0444);
A similar patch has been proposed before. I'd prefer not to add an
option to overclock the display hardware. See this discussion for
more background:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172421
Alex
> +
> +
> static struct pci_device_id pciidlist[] = {
> radeon_PCI_IDS
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_encoders.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_encoders.c
> index 46549d5179ee..6b805bcd5726 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_encoders.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_encoders.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> #include "radeon_legacy_encoders.h"
> #include "atom.h"
>
> +extern int hdmimhz;
> +
> static uint32_t radeon_encoder_clones(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = encoder->dev;
> @@ -389,7 +391,7 @@ bool radeon_dig_monitor_is_duallink(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> else
> return false;
> } else {
> - if (pixel_clock > 165000)
> + if (pixel_clock > (hdmimhz * 1000))
> return true;
> else
> return false;
> @@ -414,7 +416,7 @@ bool radeon_dig_monitor_is_duallink(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> else
> return false;
> } else {
> - if (pixel_clock > 165000)
> + if (pixel_clock > (hdmimhz * 1000))
> return true;
> else
> return false;
> --
> 2.30.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list