[PATCH v2 01/11] drm/sched: Split drm_sched_job_init
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Thu Jul 8 07:53:00 UTC 2021
Am 08.07.21 um 09:19 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 9:09 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:56 AM Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>>> Am 07.07.21 um 18:32 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 2:58 PM Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>> Am 07.07.21 um 14:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 1:57 PM Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 07.07.21 um 13:14 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:30 AM Christian König
>>>>>>>> <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Am 02.07.21 um 23:38 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>>>>>>>> This is a very confusingly named function, because not just does it
>>>>>>>>>> init an object, it arms it and provides a point of no return for
>>>>>>>>>> pushing a job into the scheduler. It would be nice if that's a bit
>>>>>>>>>> clearer in the interface.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But the real reason is that I want to push the dependency tracking
>>>>>>>>>> helpers into the scheduler code, and that means drm_sched_job_init
>>>>>>>>>> must be called a lot earlier, without arming the job.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>>>>>> - don't change .gitignore (Steven)
>>>>>>>>>> - don't forget v3d (Emma)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> v3: Emma noticed that I leak the memory allocated in
>>>>>>>>>> drm_sched_job_init if we bail out before the point of no return in
>>>>>>>>>> subsequent driver patches. To be able to fix this change
>>>>>>>>>> drm_sched_job_cleanup() so it can handle being called both before and
>>>>>>>>>> after drm_sched_job_arm().
>>>>>>>>> Thinking more about this, I'm not sure if this really works.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See drm_sched_job_init() was also calling drm_sched_entity_select_rq()
>>>>>>>>> to update the entity->rq association.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And that can only be done later on when we arm the fence as well.
>>>>>>>> Hm yeah, but that's a bug in the existing code I think: We already
>>>>>>>> fail to clean up if we fail to allocate the fences. So I think the
>>>>>>>> right thing to do here is to split the checks into job_init, and do
>>>>>>>> the actual arming/rq selection in job_arm? I'm not entirely sure
>>>>>>>> what's all going on there, the first check looks a bit like trying to
>>>>>>>> schedule before the entity is set up, which is a driver bug and should
>>>>>>>> have a WARN_ON?
>>>>>>> No you misunderstood me, the problem is something else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You asked previously why the call to drm_sched_job_init() was so late in
>>>>>>> the CS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reason for this was not alone the scheduler fence init, but also the
>>>>>>> call to drm_sched_entity_select_rq().
>>>>>> Ah ok, I think I can fix that. Needs a prep patch to first make
>>>>>> drm_sched_entity_select infallible, then should be easy to do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The 2nd check around last_scheduled I have honeslty no idea what it's
>>>>>>>> even trying to do.
>>>>>>> You mean that here?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fence = READ_ONCE(entity->last_scheduled);
>>>>>>> if (fence && !dma_fence_is_signaled(fence))
>>>>>>> return;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This makes sure that load balancing is not moving the entity to a
>>>>>>> different scheduler while there are still jobs running from this entity
>>>>>>> on the hardware,
>>>>>> Yeah after a nap that idea crossed my mind too. But now I have locking
>>>>>> questions, afaiui the scheduler thread updates this, without taking
>>>>>> any locks - entity dequeuing is lockless. And here we read the fence
>>>>>> and then seem to yolo check whether it's signalled? What's preventing
>>>>>> a use-after-free here? There's no rcu or anything going on here at
>>>>>> all, and it's outside of the spinlock section, which starts a bit
>>>>>> further down.
>>>>> The last_scheduled fence of an entity can only change when there are
>>>>> jobs on the entities queued, and we have just ruled that out in the
>>>>> check before.
>>>> There aren't any barriers, so the cpu could easily run the two checks
>>>> the other way round. I'll ponder this and figure out where exactly we
>>>> need docs for the constraint and/or barriers to make this work as
>>>> intended. As-is I'm not seeing how it does ...
>>> spsc_queue_count() provides the necessary barrier with the atomic_read().
>> atomic_t is fully unordered, except when it's a read-modify-write
> Wasn't awake yet, I think the rule is read-modify-write and return
> previous value gives you full barrier. So stuff like cmpxchg, but also
> a few others. See atomic_t.txt under ODERING heading (yes that
> maintainer refuses to accept .rst so I can't just link you to the
> right section, it's silly). get/set and even RMW atomic ops that don't
> return anything are all fully unordered.
As far as I know that not completely correct. The rules around atomics i
once learned are:
1. Everything which modifies something is a write barrier.
2. Everything which returns something is a read barrier.
And I know a whole bunch of use cases where this is relied upon in the
core kernel, so I'm pretty sure that's correct.
In this case the write barrier is the atomic_dec() in spsc_queue_pop()
and the read barrier is the aromic_read() in spsc_queue_count().
The READ_ONCE() is actually not even necessary as far as I can see.
Christian.
> -Daniel
>
>
>> atomic op, then it's a full barrier. So yeah you need more here. But
>> also since you only need a read barrier on one side, and a write
>> barrier on the other, you don't actually need a cpu barriers on x86.
>> And READ_ONCE gives you the compiler barrier on one side at least, I
>> haven't found it on the writer side yet.
>>
>>> But yes a comment would be really nice here. I had to think for a while
>>> why we don't need this as well.
>> I'm typing a patch, which after a night's sleep I realized has the
>> wrong barriers. And now I'm also typing some doc improvements for
>> drm_sched_entity and related functions.
>>
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> -Daniel
>>>>
>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Daniel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also improve the kerneldoc for this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com> (v2)
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Russell King <linux+etnaviv at armlinux.org.uk>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Qiang Yu <yuq825 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig at collabora.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal at linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy at kernel.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Adam Borowski <kilobyte at angband.pl>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln at fb.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei at kernel.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel at molgen.mpg.de>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen at google.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Chen Li <chenli at uniontech.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "Marek Olšák" <marek.olsak at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Dennis Li <Dennis.Li at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Sonny Jiang <sonny.jiang at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at collabora.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Tian Tao <tiantao6 at hisilicon.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Jack Zhang <Jack.Zhang1 at amd.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: etnaviv at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: lima at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: linux-media at vger.kernel.org
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: linaro-mm-sig at lists.linaro.org
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Emma Anholt <emma at anholt.net>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_sched.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 6 ++--
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c | 17 +++++----
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>>>>> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 7 +++-
>>>>>>>>>> 10 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
>>>>>>>>>> index c5386d13eb4a..a4ec092af9a7 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1226,6 +1226,8 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
>>>>>>>>>> if (r)
>>>>>>>>>> goto error_unlock;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_sched_job_arm(&job->base);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> /* No memory allocation is allowed while holding the notifier lock.
>>>>>>>>>> * The lock is held until amdgpu_cs_submit is finished and fence is
>>>>>>>>>> * added to BOs.
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
>>>>>>>>>> index d33e6d97cc89..5ddb955d2315 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ int amdgpu_job_submit(struct amdgpu_job *job, struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>>>>>>>> if (r)
>>>>>>>>>> return r;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_sched_job_arm(&job->base);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> *f = dma_fence_get(&job->base.s_fence->finished);
>>>>>>>>>> amdgpu_job_free_resources(job);
>>>>>>>>>> drm_sched_entity_push_job(&job->base, entity);
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_sched.c
>>>>>>>>>> index feb6da1b6ceb..05f412204118 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_sched.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_sched.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ int etnaviv_sched_push_job(struct drm_sched_entity *sched_entity,
>>>>>>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>>>>>>> goto out_unlock;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_sched_job_arm(&submit->sched_job);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> submit->out_fence = dma_fence_get(&submit->sched_job.s_fence->finished);
>>>>>>>>>> submit->out_fence_id = idr_alloc_cyclic(&submit->gpu->fence_idr,
>>>>>>>>>> submit->out_fence, 0,
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
>>>>>>>>>> index dba8329937a3..38f755580507 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ int lima_sched_task_init(struct lima_sched_task *task,
>>>>>>>>>> return err;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_sched_job_arm(&task->base);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> task->num_bos = num_bos;
>>>>>>>>>> task->vm = lima_vm_get(vm);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 71a72fb50e6b..2992dc85325f 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ int panfrost_job_push(struct panfrost_job *job)
>>>>>>>>>> goto unlock;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_sched_job_arm(&job->base);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> job->render_done_fence = dma_fence_get(&job->base.s_fence->finished);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ret = panfrost_acquire_object_fences(job->bos, job->bo_count,
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 79554aa4dbb1..f7347c284886 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -485,9 +485,9 @@ void drm_sched_entity_select_rq(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>>>>>>>>>> * @sched_job: job to submit
>>>>>>>>>> * @entity: scheduler entity
>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>> - * Note: To guarantee that the order of insertion to queue matches
>>>>>>>>>> - * the job's fence sequence number this function should be
>>>>>>>>>> - * called with drm_sched_job_init under common lock.
>>>>>>>>>> + * Note: To guarantee that the order of insertion to queue matches the job's
>>>>>>>>>> + * fence sequence number this function should be called with drm_sched_job_arm()
>>>>>>>>>> + * under common lock.
>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>> * Returns 0 for success, negative error code otherwise.
>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 69de2c76731f..c451ee9a30d7 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static const char *drm_sched_fence_get_timeline_name(struct dma_fence *f)
>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>> * Free up the fence memory after the RCU grace period.
>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>> -static void drm_sched_fence_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
>>>>>>>>>> +void drm_sched_fence_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> struct dma_fence *f = container_of(rcu, struct dma_fence, rcu);
>>>>>>>>>> struct drm_sched_fence *fence = to_drm_sched_fence(f);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -152,11 +152,10 @@ struct drm_sched_fence *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f)
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_drm_sched_fence);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_create(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>>>>>>>> - void *owner)
>>>>>>>>>> +struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_alloc(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>>>>>>>> + void *owner)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> struct drm_sched_fence *fence = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>> - unsigned seq;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> fence = kmem_cache_zalloc(sched_fence_slab, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>>>>>> if (fence == NULL)
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -166,13 +165,19 @@ struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_create(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>>>>>>>> fence->sched = entity->rq->sched;
>>>>>>>>>> spin_lock_init(&fence->lock);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + return fence;
>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +void drm_sched_fence_init(struct drm_sched_fence *fence,
>>>>>>>>>> + struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>> + unsigned seq;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> seq = atomic_inc_return(&entity->fence_seq);
>>>>>>>>>> dma_fence_init(&fence->scheduled, &drm_sched_fence_ops_scheduled,
>>>>>>>>>> &fence->lock, entity->fence_context, seq);
>>>>>>>>>> dma_fence_init(&fence->finished, &drm_sched_fence_ops_finished,
>>>>>>>>>> &fence->lock, entity->fence_context + 1, seq);
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> - return fence;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> module_init(drm_sched_fence_slab_init);
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 33c414d55fab..5e84e1500c32 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -48,9 +48,11 @@
>>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/wait.h>
>>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/completion.h>
>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/dma-resv.h>
>>>>>>>>>> #include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>>>>>>>>>> +#include <drm/drm_gem.h>
>>>>>>>>>> #include <drm/gpu_scheduler.h>
>>>>>>>>>> #include <drm/spsc_queue.h>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -569,7 +571,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_resubmit_jobs_ext);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>>>>> * drm_sched_job_init - init a scheduler job
>>>>>>>>>> - *
>>>>>>>>>> * @job: scheduler job to init
>>>>>>>>>> * @entity: scheduler entity to use
>>>>>>>>>> * @owner: job owner for debugging
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -577,6 +578,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_resubmit_jobs_ext);
>>>>>>>>>> * Refer to drm_sched_entity_push_job() documentation
>>>>>>>>>> * for locking considerations.
>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>> + * Drivers must make sure drm_sched_job_cleanup() if this function returns
>>>>>>>>>> + * successfully, even when @job is aborted before drm_sched_job_arm() is called.
>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>> * Returns 0 for success, negative error code otherwise.
>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>> int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -594,7 +598,7 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>>>>>>>>> job->sched = sched;
>>>>>>>>>> job->entity = entity;
>>>>>>>>>> job->s_priority = entity->rq - sched->sched_rq;
>>>>>>>>>> - job->s_fence = drm_sched_fence_create(entity, owner);
>>>>>>>>>> + job->s_fence = drm_sched_fence_alloc(entity, owner);
>>>>>>>>>> if (!job->s_fence)
>>>>>>>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>>>>>> job->id = atomic64_inc_return(&sched->job_id_count);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -606,13 +610,47 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>>>>>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_init);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>>>>> - * drm_sched_job_cleanup - clean up scheduler job resources
>>>>>>>>>> + * drm_sched_job_arm - arm a scheduler job for execution
>>>>>>>>>> + * @job: scheduler job to arm
>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>> + * This arms a scheduler job for execution. Specifically it initializes the
>>>>>>>>>> + * &drm_sched_job.s_fence of @job, so that it can be attached to struct dma_resv
>>>>>>>>>> + * or other places that need to track the completion of this job.
>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>> + * Refer to drm_sched_entity_push_job() documentation for locking
>>>>>>>>>> + * considerations.
>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>> + * This can only be called if drm_sched_job_init() succeeded.
>>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>>> +void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job *job)
>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_sched_fence_init(job->s_fence, job->entity);
>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_arm);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>>>>> + * drm_sched_job_cleanup - clean up scheduler job resources
>>>>>>>>>> * @job: scheduler job to clean up
>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>> + * Cleans up the resources allocated with drm_sched_job_init().
>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>> + * Drivers should call this from their error unwind code if @job is aborted
>>>>>>>>>> + * before drm_sched_job_arm() is called.
>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>> + * After that point of no return @job is committed to be executed by the
>>>>>>>>>> + * scheduler, and this function should be called from the
>>>>>>>>>> + * &drm_sched_backend_ops.free_job callback.
>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>> void drm_sched_job_cleanup(struct drm_sched_job *job)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> - dma_fence_put(&job->s_fence->finished);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!kref_read(&job->s_fence->finished.refcount)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + /* drm_sched_job_arm() has been called */
>>>>>>>>>> + dma_fence_put(&job->s_fence->finished);
>>>>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>>>>> + /* aborted job before committing to run it */
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_sched_fence_free(&job->s_fence->finished.rcu);
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> job->s_fence = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_cleanup);
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 4eb354226972..5c3a99027ecd 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -475,6 +475,8 @@ v3d_push_job(struct v3d_file_priv *v3d_priv,
>>>>>>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + drm_sched_job_arm(&job->base);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> job->done_fence = dma_fence_get(&job->base.s_fence->finished);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* put by scheduler job completion */
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>>>>>>>>> index 88ae7f331bb1..83afc3aa8e2f 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ void drm_sched_fini(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched);
>>>>>>>>>> int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>>>>>>>>> struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>>>>>>>> void *owner);
>>>>>>>>>> +void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job *job);
>>>>>>>>>> void drm_sched_entity_modify_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>>>>>>>> struct drm_gpu_scheduler **sched_list,
>>>>>>>>>> unsigned int num_sched_list);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -387,8 +388,12 @@ void drm_sched_entity_set_priority(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>>>>>>>> enum drm_sched_priority priority);
>>>>>>>>>> bool drm_sched_entity_is_ready(struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_create(
>>>>>>>>>> +struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_alloc(
>>>>>>>>>> struct drm_sched_entity *s_entity, void *owner);
>>>>>>>>>> +void drm_sched_fence_init(struct drm_sched_fence *fence,
>>>>>>>>>> + struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
>>>>>>>>>> +void drm_sched_fence_free(struct rcu_head *rcu);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> void drm_sched_fence_scheduled(struct drm_sched_fence *fence);
>>>>>>>>>> void drm_sched_fence_finished(struct drm_sched_fence *fence);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Vetter
>> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.ffwll.ch%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C1ac51fc78f9f4e2f08a808d941e0c013%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637613255881294371%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=PRGZl6tUAc7FrL39mu%2BBV2AfC02Mz9R2Neqs5TjdB6M%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.ffwll.ch%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C1ac51fc78f9f4e2f08a808d941e0c013%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637613255881294371%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=PRGZl6tUAc7FrL39mu%2BBV2AfC02Mz9R2Neqs5TjdB6M%3D&reserved=0
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list