[PATCH 22/47] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Sat Jul 10 03:55:02 UTC 2021
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 05:16:34PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> On 6/24/2021 00:04, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > When running the GuC the GPU can't be considered idle if the GuC still
> > has contexts pinned. As such, a call has been added in
> > intel_gt_wait_for_idle to idle the UC and in turn the GuC by waiting for
> > the number of unpinned contexts to go to zero.
> >
> > v2: rtimeout -> remaining_timeout
> >
> > Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 3 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 19 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c | 22 ++---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h | 9 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 4 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h | 4 +
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h | 5 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 1 +
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c | 2 +-
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 3 +-
> > 14 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> > index 2fd155742bd2..335b955d5b4b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> > @@ -644,7 +644,8 @@ mmap_offset_attach(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > goto insert;
> > /* Attempt to reap some mmap space from dead objects */
> > - err = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(&i915->gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> > + err = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(&i915->gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT,
> > + NULL);
> > if (err)
> > goto err;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> > index e714e21c0a4d..acfdd53b2678 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> > @@ -585,6 +585,25 @@ static void __intel_gt_disable(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > GEM_BUG_ON(intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt));
> > }
> > +int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout)
> > +{
> > + long remaining_timeout;
> > +
> > + /* If the device is asleep, we have no requests outstanding */
> > + if (!intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + while ((timeout = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, timeout,
> > + &remaining_timeout)) > 0) {
> > + cond_resched();
> > + if (signal_pending(current))
> > + return -EINTR;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return timeout ? timeout : intel_uc_wait_for_idle(>->uc,
> > + remaining_timeout);
> > +}
> > +
> > int intel_gt_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > {
> > int err;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> > index e7aabe0cc5bf..74e771871a9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h
> > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ void intel_gt_driver_release(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > void intel_gt_driver_late_release(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > +int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout);
> > +
> > void intel_gt_check_and_clear_faults(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > void intel_gt_clear_error_registers(struct intel_gt *gt,
> > intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
> > index 647eca9d867a..39f5e824dac5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > #include "intel_gt_pm.h"
> > #include "intel_gt_requests.h"
> > #include "intel_timeline.h"
> > +#include "uc/intel_uc.h"
> Why is this needed?
>
It is not, likely holdover from internal churn.
> > static bool retire_requests(struct intel_timeline *tl)
> > {
> > @@ -130,7 +131,8 @@ void intel_engine_fini_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > GEM_BUG_ON(engine->retire);
> > }
> > -long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout)
> > +long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout,
> > + long *remaining_timeout)
> > {
> > struct intel_gt_timelines *timelines = >->timelines;
> > struct intel_timeline *tl, *tn;
> > @@ -195,22 +197,10 @@ out_active: spin_lock(&timelines->lock);
> > if (flush_submission(gt, timeout)) /* Wait, there's more! */
> > active_count++;
> > - return active_count ? timeout : 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout)
> > -{
> > - /* If the device is asleep, we have no requests outstanding */
> > - if (!intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt))
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > - while ((timeout = intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, timeout)) > 0) {
> > - cond_resched();
> > - if (signal_pending(current))
> > - return -EINTR;
> > - }
> > + if (remaining_timeout)
> > + *remaining_timeout = timeout;
> > - return timeout;
> > + return active_count ? timeout : 0;
> > }
> > static void retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > index fcc30a6e4fe9..51dbe0e3294e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h
> > @@ -6,14 +6,17 @@
> > #ifndef INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > #define INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H
> > +#include <stddef.h>
> > +
> Why is this needed?
>
I swear I needed stddef.h for NULL on a different machice of mine. It
seems to be quite happy without it on my current machine. Can remove.
> > struct intel_engine_cs;
> > struct intel_gt;
> > struct intel_timeline;
> > -long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout);
> > +long intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout,
> > + long *remaining_timeout);
> > static inline void intel_gt_retire_requests(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > {
> > - intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, 0);
> > + intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, 0, NULL);
> > }
> > void intel_engine_init_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> > @@ -21,8 +24,6 @@ void intel_engine_add_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > struct intel_timeline *tl);
> > void intel_engine_fini_retire(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> > -int intel_gt_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt, long timeout);
> > -
> > void intel_gt_init_requests(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > void intel_gt_park_requests(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > void intel_gt_unpark_requests(struct intel_gt *gt);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > index 24e7a924134e..22eb1e9cca41 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct intel_guc {
> > spinlock_t irq_lock;
> > unsigned int msg_enabled_mask;
> > + atomic_t outstanding_submission_g2h;
> > +
> > struct {
> > void (*reset)(struct intel_guc *guc);
> > void (*enable)(struct intel_guc *guc);
> > @@ -238,6 +240,8 @@ static inline void intel_guc_disable_msg(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 mask)
> > spin_unlock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
> > }
> > +int intel_guc_wait_for_idle(struct intel_guc *guc, long timeout);
> > +
> > int intel_guc_reset_engine(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > index a60970e85635..e0f92e28350c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ void intel_guc_ct_init_early(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ct->requests.incoming);
> > INIT_WORK(&ct->requests.worker, ct_incoming_request_worker_func);
> > tasklet_setup(&ct->receive_tasklet, ct_receive_tasklet_func);
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&ct->wq);
> > }
> > static inline const char *guc_ct_buffer_type_to_str(u32 type)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> > index 660bf37238e2..ab1b79ab960b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > #include <linux/ktime.h>
> > +#include <linux/wait.h>
> > #include "intel_guc_fwif.h"
> > @@ -68,6 +69,9 @@ struct intel_guc_ct {
> > struct tasklet_struct receive_tasklet;
> > + /** @wq: wait queue for g2h chanenl */
> > + wait_queue_head_t wq;
> > +
> > struct {
> > u16 last_fence; /* last fence used to send request */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > index ef24758c4266..d1a28283a9ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > @@ -254,6 +254,74 @@ static inline void set_lrc_desc_registered(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 id,
> > xa_store_irq(&guc->context_lookup, id, ce, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > }
> > +static int guc_submission_busy_loop(struct intel_guc* guc,
> I think this name is misleading. It would be better as
> guc_submission_send_busy_loop.
>
Yep, better name. Will fix.
> > + const u32 *action,
> > + u32 len,
> > + u32 g2h_len_dw,
> > + bool loop)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw, loop);
> > +
> > + if (!err && g2h_len_dw)
> > + atomic_inc(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int guc_wait_for_pending_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > + atomic_t *wait_var,
> > + bool interruptible,
> > + long timeout)
> > +{
> > + const int state = interruptible ?
> > + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE : TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
> > + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> > +
> > + might_sleep();
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(timeout < 0);
> > +
> > + if (!atomic_read(wait_var))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (!timeout)
> > + return -ETIME;
> > +
> > + for (;;) {
> > + prepare_to_wait(&guc->ct.wq, &wait, state);
> > +
> > + if (!atomic_read(wait_var))
> > + break;
> > +
> > + if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
> > + timeout = -ERESTARTSYS;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!timeout) {
> > + timeout = -ETIME;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + timeout = io_schedule_timeout(timeout);
> > + }
> > + finish_wait(&guc->ct.wq, &wait);
> > +
> > + return (timeout < 0) ? timeout : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int intel_guc_wait_for_idle(struct intel_guc *guc, long timeout)
> > +{
> > + bool interruptible = true;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(timeout < 0))
> > + timeout = -timeout, interruptible = false;
> Why is this a comma bridged statement rather than just two lines with braces
> on the if?
>
> And overloading negative timeouts to mean non-interruptible seems
> unnecessarily convoluted in the first place. Why not just have an
> interruptible parameter? I'm also not seeing how the timeout gets to be
> negative in the first place?
>
Copy paste from some other code, can remove the comma and replace with 2
lines.
This is how intel_gt_wait_for_idle works which in turn calls this. Not
saying the negative parameter meaning something special is right, just
how it is currently done. Now that you mention this with the
remaining_timeout I may have broken this too. How about I just add
parameter than this convoluted sceme as you suggest.
>
> > +
> > + return guc_wait_for_pending_msg(guc, &guc->outstanding_submission_g2h,
> > + interruptible, timeout);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
> > {
> > int err;
> > @@ -280,6 +348,7 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
> > err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw);
> > if (!enabled && !err) {
> > + atomic_inc(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h);
> > set_context_enabled(ce);
> > } else if (!enabled) {
> > clr_context_pending_enable(ce);
> > @@ -731,7 +800,7 @@ static int __guc_action_register_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > offset,
> > };
> > - return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
> > + return guc_submission_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
> > }
> > static int register_context(struct intel_context *ce)
> > @@ -751,7 +820,7 @@ static int __guc_action_deregister_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > guc_id,
> > };
> > - return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> > + return guc_submission_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> > G2H_LEN_DW_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT, true);
> > }
> > @@ -868,7 +937,9 @@ static int guc_context_pin(struct intel_context *ce, void *vaddr)
> > static void guc_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > {
> > - unpin_guc_id(ce_to_guc(ce), ce);
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> > +
> > + unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
> Should this be part of this patch?
>
Not likely. Let me see what is going on here.
> > lrc_unpin(ce);
> > }
> > @@ -891,7 +962,7 @@ static void __guc_context_sched_disable(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > intel_context_get(ce);
> > - intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> > + guc_submission_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
> > G2H_LEN_DW_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET, true);
> > }
> > @@ -1433,6 +1504,12 @@ g2h_context_lookup(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 desc_idx)
> > return ce;
> > }
> > +static void decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > +{
> > + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h))
> > + wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq);
> > +}
> > +
> > int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > const u32 *msg,
> > u32 len)
> > @@ -1468,6 +1545,8 @@ int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > lrc_destroy(&ce->ref);
> > }
> > + decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -1516,6 +1595,7 @@ int intel_guc_sched_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> > }
> > + decr_outstanding_submission_g2h(guc);
> > intel_context_put(ce);
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> > index 9c954c589edf..c4cef885e984 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
> > @@ -81,6 +81,11 @@ uc_state_checkers(guc, guc_submission);
> > #undef uc_state_checkers
> > #undef __uc_state_checker
> > +static inline int intel_uc_wait_for_idle(struct intel_uc *uc, long timeout)
> > +{
> > + return intel_guc_wait_for_idle(&uc->guc, timeout);
> > +}
> > +
> > #define intel_uc_ops_function(_NAME, _OPS, _TYPE, _RET) \
> > static inline _TYPE intel_uc_##_NAME(struct intel_uc *uc) \
> > { \
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index cc745751ac53..277800987bf8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> > #include "gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_gt_pm.h"
> > +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> All of these extra includes seem incorrect. There is no code change in any
> of the files below that would warrant a new include.
>
Well this is surely wrong as it is included two lines above. Will fix.
Matt
> John.
>
>
> > #include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_reset.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_rc6.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> > index 4d2d59a9942b..2b73ddb11c66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> > */
> > #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
> > +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
> > #include "i915_drv.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c
> > index c130010a7033..1c721542e277 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> > */
> > #include "i915_drv.h"
> > -#include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
> > +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> > #include "../i915_selftest.h"
> > #include "igt_flush_test.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> > index d189c4bd4bef..4f8180146888 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ void mock_device_flush(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > do {
> > for_each_engine(engine, gt, id)
> > mock_engine_flush(engine);
> > - } while (intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT));
> > + } while (intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT,
> > + NULL));
> > }
> > static void mock_device_release(struct drm_device *dev)
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list