[PATCH 1/1] drm: bridge: Mark deprecated operations in drm_bridge_funcs

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Sam,

Thank you for the patch.

On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:42:40AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> drm_bridge_funcs includes several duplicated operations as atomic
> variants has been added over time.

s/has/have/

> New bridge drivers shall use the atomic variants - mark the deprecated
> operations to try to avoid usage in new bridge drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda at samsung.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> index 2195daa289d2..6805898d70f5 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> @@ -171,6 +171,11 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>  	 * signals) feeding it is still running when this callback is called.
>  	 *
>  	 * The @disable callback is optional.
> +	 *
> +	 * NOTE:
> +	 *
> +	 * This is deprecated, do not use!
> +	 * New drivers shall use &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_disable.
>  	 */
>  	void (*disable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
>  
> @@ -190,6 +195,11 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>  	 * called.
>  	 *
>  	 * The @post_disable callback is optional.
> +	 *
> +	 * NOTE:
> +	 *
> +	 * This is deprecated, do not use!
> +	 * New drivers shall use &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_post_disable.
>  	 */
>  	void (*post_disable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
>  
> @@ -213,11 +223,15 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>  	 * For atomic drivers the adjusted_mode is the mode stored in
>  	 * &drm_crtc_state.adjusted_mode.
>  	 *
> -	 * NOTE:
> -	 *
>  	 * If a need arises to store and access modes adjusted for other
>  	 * locations than the connection between the CRTC and the first bridge,
>  	 * the DRM framework will have to be extended with DRM bridge states.

The DRM framework *has* been extended with DRM bridge states :-) Should
this be dropped ?

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>

> +	 *
> +	 * NOTE:
> +	 *
> +	 * This is deprecated, do not use!
> +	 * New drivers shall set their mode in &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_enable
> +	 * operation.
>  	 */
>  	void (*mode_set)(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  			 const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> @@ -239,6 +253,11 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>  	 * there is one) when this callback is called.
>  	 *
>  	 * The @pre_enable callback is optional.
> +	 *
> +	 * NOTE:
> +	 *
> +	 * This is deprecated, do not use!
> +	 * New drivers shall use &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_pre_enable.
>  	 */
>  	void (*pre_enable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
>  
> @@ -259,6 +278,11 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>  	 * chain if there is one.
>  	 *
>  	 * The @enable callback is optional.
> +	 *
> +	 * NOTE:
> +	 *
> +	 * This is deprecated, do not use!
> +	 * New drivers shall use &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_enable.
>  	 */
>  	void (*enable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
>  

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart