[PATCH] drm/lima: Convert to clk_bulk API

[Qiang Yu]

On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:52 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>
> On 7/17/21 4:21 PM, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 9:08 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/17/21 2:34 PM, Qiang Yu wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:20 AM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Instead of requesting two separate clock and then handling them
> >>>> separately in various places of the driver, use clk_bulk_*() API.
> >>>> This permits handling devices with more than "bus"/"core" clock,
> >>>> like ZynqMP, which has "gpu"/"gpu_pp0"/"gpu_pp1" all as separate
> >>>> clock.
> >>>
> >>> I can't find the ZynqMP DTS file under arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx
> >>> which has mali GPU node with an upstream kernel, where is it?
> >>
> >> Posted here:
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20210716182544.219490-1-marex@denx.de/
> >>
> >>> So what's the relationship between "gpu" clk and "gpu_pp0"/"gpu_pp1"
> >>> clk? Do they need to be controlled separately or we can just control the
> >>> "gpu" clk? Because the devfreq code just controls a single module clk.
> >>
> >> Per the docs, they are separate enable bits and the zynqmp clock
> >> controller exports them as separate clock, see bits 24..26 here:
> >>
> >> https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/crf_apb___gpu_ref_ctrl.html
> >>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> >>>> Cc: Qiang Yu <yuq825 at gmail.com>
> >>>> Cc: lima at lists.freedesktop.org
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c | 17 +++++++++---
> >>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.h |  1 +
> >>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_device.c  | 42 +++++++++++------------------
> >>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_device.h  |  4 +--
> >>>>    4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> >>>> index 8989e215dfc9..533b36932f79 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> >>>> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int lima_devfreq_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
> >>>>           struct lima_devfreq *devfreq = &ldev->devfreq;
> >>>>           unsigned long irqflags;
> >>>>
> >>>> -       status->current_frequency = clk_get_rate(ldev->clk_gpu);
> >>>> +       status->current_frequency = clk_get_rate(devfreq->clk_gpu);
> >>>>
> >>>>           spin_lock_irqsave(&devfreq->lock, irqflags);
> >>>>
> >>>> @@ -110,12 +110,23 @@ int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev)
> >>>>           struct lima_devfreq *ldevfreq = &ldev->devfreq;
> >>>>           struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> >>>>           unsigned long cur_freq;
> >>>> -       int ret;
> >>>> +       int i, ret;
> >>>>
> >>>>           if (!device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2"))
> >>>>                   /* Optional, continue without devfreq */
> >>>>                   return 0;
> >>>>
> >>>> +       /* Find first clock which are not "bus" clock */
> >>>> +       for (i = 0; i < ldev->nr_clks; i++) {
> >>>> +               if (!strcmp(ldev->clks[i].id, "bus"))
> >>>> +                       continue;
> >>>> +               ldevfreq->clk_gpu = ldev->clks[i].clk;
> >>>> +               break;
> >>>> +       }
> >>>
> >>> I'd prefer an explicit name for the required clk name. If some DTS has different
> >>> name other than "core" for the module clk (ie. "gpu"), it should be changed to
> >>> "core".
> >>
> >> The problem here is, the zynqmp has no core clock, it has "gpu and both
> >> pixel pipes" super-clock-gate which controls everything, and then
> >> per-pixel-pipe sub-clock-gates.
> >
> > So the "gpu" clk can gate both "gpu_pp0" and "gpu_pp1" clk, how about frequency?
>
> I don't think it is a good idea to just gate off the root clock while
> the sub-clock are still enabled. That might lead to latch ups (+CC
> Michal, he might know more).
>
> And who would enable the sub-clock anyway, it should be the GPU driver, no?
>
Right, I understand it's not proper either by HW or SW point of view to just
use root clk gate.

> > Can we set clock rate for "gpu" then "gpu_pp0" and "gpu_pp1" pass
> > through the same
> > rate? If so, "gpu" works just like "core".
>
> I don't think the zynqmp is capable of any DVFS on the GPU at all, it
> just runs at fixed frequency.

I see the GPU_REF_CTRL register 13:8 is a divisor, is this for all
"gpu"/"gpu_pp0"/"gpu_pp1" clk rating? If so, can we use it to dynamically
change the GPU clk freq because other SoC also use system clock
to do GPU DVFS, see sun8i-h3.dtsi. If we can't then zynqmp won't finish
lima_devfreq_init() and get here at all because it does not have
an OPP table.