[PATCH 06/51] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Tue Jul 20 04:04:01 UTC 2021
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 05:51:46PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>
>
> On 7/16/2021 1:16 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Implement GuC context operations which includes GuC specific operations
> > alloc, pin, unpin, and destroy.
> >
> > v2:
> > (Daniel Vetter)
> > - Use msleep_interruptible rather than cond_resched in busy loop
> > (Michal)
> > - Remove C++ style comment
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c | 5 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h | 22 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc_reg.h | 1 -
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 40 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 4 +
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 666 ++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 1 +
> > 8 files changed, 685 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> > index bd63813c8a80..32fd6647154b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> > @@ -384,6 +384,11 @@ intel_context_init(struct intel_context *ce, struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > mutex_init(&ce->pin_mutex);
> > + spin_lock_init(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> > +
> > + ce->guc_id = GUC_INVALID_LRC_ID;
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ce->guc_id_link);
> > +
> > i915_active_init(&ce->active,
> > __intel_context_active, __intel_context_retire, 0);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> > index 6d99631d19b9..606c480aec26 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> > @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ struct intel_context {
> > #define CONTEXT_BANNED 6
> > #define CONTEXT_FORCE_SINGLE_SUBMISSION 7
> > #define CONTEXT_NOPREEMPT 8
> > +#define CONTEXT_LRCA_DIRTY 9
> > struct {
> > u64 timeout_us;
> > @@ -138,14 +139,29 @@ struct intel_context {
> > u8 wa_bb_page; /* if set, page num reserved for context workarounds */
> > + struct {
> > + /** lock: protects everything in guc_state */
> > + spinlock_t lock;
> > + /**
> > + * sched_state: scheduling state of this context using GuC
> > + * submission
> > + */
> > + u8 sched_state;
> > + } guc_state;
> > +
> > /* GuC scheduling state flags that do not require a lock. */
> > atomic_t guc_sched_state_no_lock;
> > + /* GuC LRC descriptor ID */
> > + u16 guc_id;
> > +
> > + /* GuC LRC descriptor reference count */
> > + atomic_t guc_id_ref;
> > +
> > /*
> > - * GuC LRC descriptor ID - Not assigned in this patch but future patches
> > - * in the series will.
> > + * GuC ID link - in list when unpinned but guc_id still valid in GuC
> > */
> > - u16 guc_id;
> > + struct list_head guc_id_link;
> > };
> > #endif /* __INTEL_CONTEXT_TYPES__ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc_reg.h
> > index 41e5350a7a05..49d4857ad9b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc_reg.h
> > @@ -87,7 +87,6 @@
> > #define GEN11_CSB_WRITE_PTR_MASK (GEN11_CSB_PTR_MASK << 0)
> > #define MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID (1 << 21) /* exclusive */
> > -#define MAX_GUC_CONTEXT_HW_ID (1 << 20) /* exclusive */
> > #define GEN11_MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID (1 << 11) /* exclusive */
> > /* in Gen12 ID 0x7FF is reserved to indicate idle */
> > #define GEN12_MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID (GEN11_MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID - 1)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > index 8c7b92f699f1..30773cd699f5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #define _INTEL_GUC_H_
> > #include <linux/xarray.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > #include "intel_uncore.h"
> > #include "intel_guc_fw.h"
> > @@ -44,6 +45,14 @@ struct intel_guc {
> > void (*disable)(struct intel_guc *guc);
> > } interrupts;
> > + /*
> > + * contexts_lock protects the pool of free guc ids and a linked list of
> > + * guc ids available to be stolen
> > + */
> > + spinlock_t contexts_lock;
> > + struct ida guc_ids;
> > + struct list_head guc_id_list;
> > +
> > bool submission_selected;
> > struct i915_vma *ads_vma;
> > @@ -101,6 +110,34 @@ intel_guc_send_and_receive(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len,
> > response_buf, response_buf_size, 0);
> > }
> > +static inline int intel_guc_send_busy_loop(struct intel_guc* guc,
> > + const u32 *action,
> > + u32 len,
> > + bool loop)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > + unsigned int sleep_period_ms = 1;
> > + bool not_atomic = !in_atomic() && !irqs_disabled();
> > +
> > + /* No sleeping with spin locks, just busy loop */
> > + might_sleep_if(loop && not_atomic);
> > +
> > +retry:
> > + err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len);
> > + if (unlikely(err == -EBUSY && loop)) {
> > + if (likely(not_atomic)) {
> > + if (msleep_interruptible(sleep_period_ms))
> > + return -EINTR;
> > + sleep_period_ms = sleep_period_ms << 1;
> > + } else {
> > + cpu_relax();
>
> Potentially something we can change later, but if we're in atomic context we
> can't keep looping without a timeout while we get -EBUSY, we need to bail
> out early.
>
Eventually intel_guc_send_nb will pop with a different return code after
1 second I think if the GuC is hung.
> > + }
> > + goto retry;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline void intel_guc_to_host_event_handler(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > {
> > intel_guc_ct_event_handler(&guc->ct);
> > @@ -202,6 +239,9 @@ static inline void intel_guc_disable_msg(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 mask)
> > int intel_guc_reset_engine(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> > +int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > + const u32 *msg, u32 len);
> > +
> > void intel_guc_load_status(struct intel_guc *guc, struct drm_printer *p);
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > index 83ec60ea3f89..28ff82c5be45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > @@ -928,6 +928,10 @@ static int ct_process_request(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *r
> > case INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEFAULT:
> > ret = intel_guc_to_host_process_recv_msg(guc, payload, len);
> > break;
> > + case INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT_DONE:
> > + ret = intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(guc, payload,
> > + len);
> > + break;
> > default:
> > ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > break;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > index 53b4a5eb4a85..a47b3813b4d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> > #include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_gt_irq.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_gt_pm.h"
> > +#include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_lrc.h"
> > +#include "gt/intel_lrc_reg.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_mocs.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_ring.h"
> > @@ -85,6 +87,73 @@ static inline void clr_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
> > &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
> > }
> > +/*
> > + * Below is a set of functions which control the GuC scheduling state which
> > + * require a lock, aside from the special case where the functions are called
> > + * from guc_lrc_desc_pin(). In that case it isn't possible for any other code
> > + * path to be executing on the context.
> > + */
>
> Is there a reason to avoid taking the lock in guc_lrc_desc_pin, even if it
> isn't strictly needed? I'd prefer to avoid the asymmetry in the locking
If this code is called from releasing a fence a circular dependency is
created. Once we move the DRM scheduler the locking becomes way easier
and we clean this up then. We already have task for locking clean up.
> scheme if possible, as that might case trouble if thing change in the
> future.
Again this is temporary code, so I think we can live with this until the
DRM scheduler lands.
>
> > +#define SCHED_STATE_WAIT_FOR_DEREGISTER_TO_REGISTER BIT(0)
> > +#define SCHED_STATE_DESTROYED BIT(1)
> > +static inline void init_sched_state(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + /* Only should be called from guc_lrc_desc_pin() */
> > + atomic_set(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock, 0);
> > + ce->guc_state.sched_state = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool
> > +context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + return (ce->guc_state.sched_state &
> > + SCHED_STATE_WAIT_FOR_DEREGISTER_TO_REGISTER);
>
> No need for (). Below as well.
>
Yep.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +set_context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + /* Only should be called from guc_lrc_desc_pin() */
> > + ce->guc_state.sched_state |=
> > + SCHED_STATE_WAIT_FOR_DEREGISTER_TO_REGISTER;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +clr_context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> > + ce->guc_state.sched_state =
> > + (ce->guc_state.sched_state &
> > + ~SCHED_STATE_WAIT_FOR_DEREGISTER_TO_REGISTER);
>
> nit: can also use
>
> ce->guc_state.sched_state &=
> ~SCHED_STATE_WAIT_FOR_DEREGISTER_TO_REGISTER
>
Yep.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool
> > +context_destroyed(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + return (ce->guc_state.sched_state & SCHED_STATE_DESTROYED);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +set_context_destroyed(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
> > + ce->guc_state.sched_state |= SCHED_STATE_DESTROYED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool context_guc_id_invalid(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + return (ce->guc_id == GUC_INVALID_LRC_ID);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void set_context_guc_id_invalid(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + ce->guc_id = GUC_INVALID_LRC_ID;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct intel_guc *ce_to_guc(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + return &ce->engine->gt->uc.guc;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline struct i915_priolist *to_priolist(struct rb_node *rb)
> > {
> > return rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node);
> > @@ -155,6 +224,9 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
> > int len = 0;
> > bool enabled = context_enabled(ce);
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&ce->guc_id_ref));
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(context_guc_id_invalid(ce));
> > +
> > if (!enabled) {
> > action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET;
> > action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
> > @@ -417,6 +489,10 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > xa_init_flags(&guc->context_lookup, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ);
> > + spin_lock_init(&guc->contexts_lock);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&guc->guc_id_list);
> > + ida_init(&guc->guc_ids);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -429,9 +505,303 @@ void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > i915_sched_engine_put(guc->sched_engine);
> > }
> > -static int guc_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +static inline void queue_request(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine,
> > + struct i915_request *rq,
> > + int prio)
> > {
> > - return lrc_alloc(ce, ce->engine);
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
> > + list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link,
> > + i915_sched_lookup_priolist(sched_engine, prio));
> > + set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int guc_bypass_tasklet_submit(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > + struct i915_request *rq)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + __i915_request_submit(rq);
> > +
> > + trace_i915_request_in(rq, 0);
> > +
> > + guc_set_lrc_tail(rq);
> > + ret = guc_add_request(guc, rq);
> > + if (ret == -EBUSY)
> > + guc->stalled_request = rq;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void guc_submit_request(struct i915_request *rq)
> > +{
> > + struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = rq->engine->sched_engine;
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = &rq->engine->gt->uc.guc;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + /* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign fences. */
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (guc->stalled_request || !i915_sched_engine_is_empty(sched_engine))
> > + queue_request(sched_engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
> > + else if (guc_bypass_tasklet_submit(guc, rq) == -EBUSY)
> > + tasklet_hi_schedule(&sched_engine->tasklet);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define GUC_ID_START 64 /* First 64 guc_ids reserved */
> > +static int new_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > +{
> > + return ida_simple_get(&guc->guc_ids, GUC_ID_START,
> > + GUC_MAX_LRC_DESCRIPTORS, GFP_KERNEL |
> > + __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __release_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + if (!context_guc_id_invalid(ce)) {
> > + ida_simple_remove(&guc->guc_ids, ce->guc_id);
> > + reset_lrc_desc(guc, ce->guc_id);
> > + set_context_guc_id_invalid(ce);
> > + }
> > + if (!list_empty(&ce->guc_id_link))
> > + list_del_init(&ce->guc_id_link);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void release_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> > + __release_guc_id(guc, ce);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int steal_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_context *ce;
> > + int guc_id;
> > +
> > + if (!list_empty(&guc->guc_id_list)) {
> > + ce = list_first_entry(&guc->guc_id_list,
> > + struct intel_context,
> > + guc_id_link);
> > +
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->guc_id_ref));
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(context_guc_id_invalid(ce));
> > +
> > + list_del_init(&ce->guc_id_link);
> > + guc_id = ce->guc_id;
> > + set_context_guc_id_invalid(ce);
> > + return guc_id;
> > + } else {
> > + return -EAGAIN;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int assign_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, u16 *out)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = new_guc_id(guc);
> > + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> > + ret = steal_guc_id(guc);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *out = ret;
> > + return 0;
>
> Is it worth adding spinlock_held asserts for guc->contexts_lock in these ID
> functions? Doubles up as a documentation of what locking we expect.
>
Never a bad idea to have asserts in the code. Will add.
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define PIN_GUC_ID_TRIES 4
> > +static int pin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + unsigned long flags, tries = PIN_GUC_ID_TRIES;
> > +
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->guc_id_ref));
> > +
> > +try_again:
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (context_guc_id_invalid(ce)) {
> > + ret = assign_guc_id(guc, &ce->guc_id);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + ret = 1; /* Indidcates newly assigned guc_id */
> > + }
> > + if (!list_empty(&ce->guc_id_link))
> > + list_del_init(&ce->guc_id_link);
> > + atomic_inc(&ce->guc_id_ref);
> > +
> > +out_unlock:
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * -EAGAIN indicates no guc_ids are available, let's retire any
> > + * outstanding requests to see if that frees up a guc_id. If the first
> > + * retire didn't help, insert a sleep with the timeslice duration before
> > + * attempting to retire more requests. Double the sleep period each
> > + * subsequent pass before finally giving up. The sleep period has max of
> > + * 100ms and minimum of 1ms.
> > + */
> > + if (ret == -EAGAIN && --tries) {
> > + if (PIN_GUC_ID_TRIES - tries > 1) {
> > + unsigned int timeslice_shifted =
> > + ce->engine->props.timeslice_duration_ms <<
> > + (PIN_GUC_ID_TRIES - tries - 2);
> > + unsigned int max = min_t(unsigned int, 100,
> > + timeslice_shifted);
> > +
> > + msleep(max_t(unsigned int, max, 1));
> > + }
> > + intel_gt_retire_requests(guc_to_gt(guc));
> > + goto try_again;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void unpin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->guc_id_ref) < 0);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> > + if (!context_guc_id_invalid(ce) && list_empty(&ce->guc_id_link) &&
> > + !atomic_read(&ce->guc_id_ref))
> > + list_add_tail(&ce->guc_id_link, &guc->guc_id_list);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __guc_action_register_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > + u32 guc_id,
> > + u32 offset)
> > +{
> > + u32 action[] = {
> > + INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_CONTEXT,
> > + guc_id,
> > + offset,
> > + };
> > +
> > + return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int register_context(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> > + u32 offset = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, guc->lrc_desc_pool) +
> > + ce->guc_id * sizeof(struct guc_lrc_desc);
> > +
> > + return __guc_action_register_context(guc, ce->guc_id, offset);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __guc_action_deregister_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > + u32 guc_id)
> > +{
> > + u32 action[] = {
> > + INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT,
> > + guc_id,
> > + };
> > +
> > + return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int deregister_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 guc_id)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> > +
> > + return __guc_action_deregister_context(guc, guc_id);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static intel_engine_mask_t adjust_engine_mask(u8 class, intel_engine_mask_t mask)
> > +{
> > + switch (class) {
> > + case RENDER_CLASS:
> > + return mask >> RCS0;
> > + case VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS:
> > + return mask >> VECS0;
> > + case VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS:
> > + return mask >> VCS0;
> > + case COPY_ENGINE_CLASS:
> > + return mask >> BCS0;
> > + default:
> > + GEM_BUG_ON("Invalid Class");
>
> we usually use MISSING_CASE for this type of errors.
As soon as start talking in logical space (series immediatly after this
gets merged) this function gets deleted but will fix.
>
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void guc_context_policy_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > + struct guc_lrc_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + desc->policy_flags = 0;
> > +
> > + desc->execution_quantum = CONTEXT_POLICY_DEFAULT_EXECUTION_QUANTUM_US;
> > + desc->preemption_timeout = CONTEXT_POLICY_DEFAULT_PREEMPTION_TIME_US;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int guc_lrc_desc_pin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_runtime_pm *runtime_pm =
> > + &ce->engine->gt->i915->runtime_pm;
>
> If you move this after the engine var below you can skip the ce->engine
> jump. Also, you can shorten the pointer chasing by using
> engine->uncore->rpm.
>
Sure.
> > + struct intel_engine_cs *engine = ce->engine;
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
> > + u32 desc_idx = ce->guc_id;
> > + struct guc_lrc_desc *desc;
> > + bool context_registered;
> > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(!engine->mask);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure LRC + CT vmas are is same region as write barrier is done
> > + * based on CT vma region.
> > + */
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_is_lmem(guc->ct.vma->obj) !=
> > + i915_gem_object_is_lmem(ce->ring->vma->obj));
> > +
> > + context_registered = lrc_desc_registered(guc, desc_idx);
> > +
> > + reset_lrc_desc(guc, desc_idx);
> > + set_lrc_desc_registered(guc, desc_idx, ce);
> > +
> > + desc = __get_lrc_desc(guc, desc_idx);
> > + desc->engine_class = engine_class_to_guc_class(engine->class);
> > + desc->engine_submit_mask = adjust_engine_mask(engine->class,
> > + engine->mask);
> > + desc->hw_context_desc = ce->lrc.lrca;
> > + desc->priority = GUC_CLIENT_PRIORITY_KMD_NORMAL;
> > + desc->context_flags = CONTEXT_REGISTRATION_FLAG_KMD;
> > + guc_context_policy_init(engine, desc);
> > + init_sched_state(ce);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The context_lookup xarray is used to determine if the hardware
> > + * context is currently registered. There are two cases in which it
> > + * could be regisgered either the guc_id has been stole from from
>
> typo regisgered
>
John got this one. Fixed.
> > + * another context or the lrc descriptor address of this context has
> > + * changed. In either case the context needs to be deregistered with the
> > + * GuC before registering this context.
> > + */
> > + if (context_registered) {
> > + set_context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce);
> > + intel_context_get(ce);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If stealing the guc_id, this ce has the same guc_id as the
> > + * context whos guc_id was stole.
> > + */
> > + with_intel_runtime_pm(runtime_pm, wakeref)
> > + ret = deregister_context(ce, ce->guc_id);
> > + } else {
> > + with_intel_runtime_pm(runtime_pm, wakeref)
> > + ret = register_context(ce);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > }
> > static int guc_context_pre_pin(struct intel_context *ce,
> > @@ -443,36 +813,139 @@ static int guc_context_pre_pin(struct intel_context *ce,
> > static int guc_context_pin(struct intel_context *ce, void *vaddr)
> > {
> > + if (i915_ggtt_offset(ce->state) !=
> > + (ce->lrc.lrca & CTX_GTT_ADDRESS_MASK))
> > + set_bit(CONTEXT_LRCA_DIRTY, &ce->flags);
>
> Shouldn't this be set after lrc_pin()? I can see ce->lrc.lrca being
> re-assigned in there; it looks like it can only change if the context is
> new, but for future-proofing IMO better to re-order here.
>
No this is right. ce->state is assigned in lr_pre_pin and ce->lrc.lrca is
assigned in lrc_pin. To catch the change you have to check between
those two functions.
> > +
> > return lrc_pin(ce, ce->engine, vaddr);
>
> Could use a comment to say that the GuC context pinning call is delayed
> until request alloc and to look at the comment in the latter function for
> details (or move the explanation here and refer here from request alloc).
>
Yes.
> > }
> > +static void guc_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> > +
> > + unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
> > + lrc_unpin(ce);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void guc_context_post_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + lrc_post_unpin(ce);
>
> why do we need this function? we can just pass lrc_post_unpin to the ops
> (like we already do).
>
We don't before style reasons I think having a GuC specific wrapper is
correct.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void guc_lrc_desc_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_engine_cs *engine = ce->engine;
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(!lrc_desc_registered(guc, ce->guc_id));
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(ce != __get_context(guc, ce->guc_id));
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> > + set_context_destroyed(ce);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> > +
> > + deregister_context(ce, ce->guc_id);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void guc_context_destroy(struct kref *kref)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_context *ce = container_of(kref, typeof(*ce), ref);
> > + struct intel_runtime_pm *runtime_pm = &ce->engine->gt->i915->runtime_pm;
>
> same as above, going through engine->uncore->rpm is shorter
>
Sure.
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = &ce->engine->gt->uc.guc;
> > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If the guc_id is invalid this context has been stolen and we can free
> > + * it immediately. Also can be freed immediately if the context is not
> > + * registered with the GuC.
> > + */
> > + if (context_guc_id_invalid(ce) ||
> > + !lrc_desc_registered(guc, ce->guc_id)) {
> > + release_guc_id(guc, ce);
>
> it feels a bit weird that we call release_guc_id in the case where the id is
> invalid. The code handles it fine, but still the flow doesn't feel clean.
> Not a blocker.
>
I understand. Let's see if this can get cleaned up at some point.
> > + lrc_destroy(kref);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We have to acquire the context spinlock and check guc_id again, if it
> > + * is valid it hasn't been stolen and needs to be deregistered. We
> > + * delete this context from the list of unpinned guc_ids available to
> > + * stole to seal a race with guc_lrc_desc_pin(). When the G2H CTB
> > + * returns indicating this context has been deregistered the guc_id is
> > + * returned to the pool of available guc_ids.
> > + */
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> > + if (context_guc_id_invalid(ce)) {
> > + __release_guc_id(guc, ce);
>
> But here the call to __release_guc_id is unneded, right? the ce doesn't own
> the ID anymore and both the steal and the release function already clean
> ce->guc_id_link, so there should be nothing left to clean.
>
This is dead code. Will delete.
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> > + lrc_destroy(kref);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!list_empty(&ce->guc_id_link))
> > + list_del_init(&ce->guc_id_link);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We defer GuC context deregistration until the context is destroyed
> > + * in order to save on CTBs. With this optimization ideally we only need
> > + * 1 CTB to register the context during the first pin and 1 CTB to
> > + * deregister the context when the context is destroyed. Without this
> > + * optimization, a CTB would be needed every pin & unpin.
> > + *
> > + * XXX: Need to acqiure the runtime wakeref as this can be triggered
> > + * from context_free_worker when not runtime wakeref is held.
> > + * guc_lrc_desc_unpin requires the runtime as a GuC register is written
> > + * in H2G CTB to deregister the context. A future patch may defer this
> > + * H2G CTB if the runtime wakeref is zero.
> > + */
> > + with_intel_runtime_pm(runtime_pm, wakeref)
> > + guc_lrc_desc_unpin(ce);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int guc_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + return lrc_alloc(ce, ce->engine);
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct intel_context_ops guc_context_ops = {
> > .alloc = guc_context_alloc,
> > .pre_pin = guc_context_pre_pin,
> > .pin = guc_context_pin,
> > - .unpin = lrc_unpin,
> > - .post_unpin = lrc_post_unpin,
> > + .unpin = guc_context_unpin,
> > + .post_unpin = guc_context_post_unpin,
> > .enter = intel_context_enter_engine,
> > .exit = intel_context_exit_engine,
> > .reset = lrc_reset,
> > - .destroy = lrc_destroy,
> > + .destroy = guc_context_destroy,
> > };
> > -static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *request)
> > +static bool context_needs_register(struct intel_context *ce, bool new_guc_id)
> > {
> > + return new_guc_id || test_bit(CONTEXT_LRCA_DIRTY, &ce->flags) ||
> > + !lrc_desc_registered(ce_to_guc(ce), ce->guc_id);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *rq)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> > int ret;
> > - GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_pinned(request->context));
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_pinned(rq->context));
> > /*
> > * Flush enough space to reduce the likelihood of waiting after
> > * we start building the request - in which case we will just
> > * have to repeat work.
> > */
> > - request->reserved_space += GUC_REQUEST_SIZE;
> > + rq->reserved_space += GUC_REQUEST_SIZE;
> > /*
> > * Note that after this point, we have committed to using
> > @@ -483,56 +956,47 @@ static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *request)
> > */
> > /* Unconditionally invalidate GPU caches and TLBs. */
> > - ret = request->engine->emit_flush(request, EMIT_INVALIDATE);
> > + ret = rq->engine->emit_flush(rq, EMIT_INVALIDATE);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > - request->reserved_space -= GUC_REQUEST_SIZE;
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > + rq->reserved_space -= GUC_REQUEST_SIZE;
> > -static inline void queue_request(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine,
> > - struct i915_request *rq,
> > - int prio)
> > -{
> > - GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
> > - list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link,
> > - i915_sched_lookup_priolist(sched_engine, prio));
> > - set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int guc_bypass_tasklet_submit(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > - struct i915_request *rq)
> > -{
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - __i915_request_submit(rq);
> > -
> > - trace_i915_request_in(rq, 0);
> > -
> > - guc_set_lrc_tail(rq);
> > - ret = guc_add_request(guc, rq);
> > - if (ret == -EBUSY)
> > - guc->stalled_request = rq;
> > -
> > - return ret;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void guc_submit_request(struct i915_request *rq)
> > -{
> > - struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = rq->engine->sched_engine;
> > - struct intel_guc *guc = &rq->engine->gt->uc.guc;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > + /*
> > + * Call pin_guc_id here rather than in the pinning step as with
> > + * dma_resv, contexts can be repeatedly pinned / unpinned trashing the
> > + * guc_ids and creating horrible race conditions. This is especially bad
> > + * when guc_ids are being stolen due to over subscription. By the time
> > + * this function is reached, it is guaranteed that the guc_id will be
> > + * persistent until the generated request is retired. Thus, sealing these
> > + * race conditions. It is still safe to fail here if guc_ids are
> > + * exhausted and return -EAGAIN to the user indicating that they can try
> > + * again in the future.
> > + *
> > + * There is no need for a lock here as the timeline mutex ensures at
> > + * most one context can be executing this code path at once. The
> > + * guc_id_ref is incremented once for every request in flight and
> > + * decremented on each retire. When it is zero, a lock around the
> > + * increment (in pin_guc_id) is needed to seal a race with unpin_guc_id.
> > + */
> > + if (atomic_add_unless(&ce->guc_id_ref, 1, 0))
> > + return 0;
> > - /* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign fences. */
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
> > + ret = pin_guc_id(guc, ce); /* returns 1 if new guc_id assigned */
> > + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> > + return ret;;
>
> typo ";;"
>
Yep.
> > + if (context_needs_register(ce, !!ret)) {
> > + ret = guc_lrc_desc_pin(ce);
> > + if (unlikely(ret)) { /* unwind */
> > + atomic_dec(&ce->guc_id_ref);
> > + unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + }
> > - if (guc->stalled_request || !i915_sched_engine_is_empty(sched_engine))
> > - queue_request(sched_engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
> > - else if (guc_bypass_tasklet_submit(guc, rq) == -EBUSY)
> > - tasklet_hi_schedule(&sched_engine->tasklet);
> > + clear_bit(CONTEXT_LRCA_DIRTY, &ce->flags);
>
>
> Might be worth moving the pinning to a separate function to keep the
> request_alloc focused on the request. Can be done as a follow up.
>
Sure. Let me see how that looks in a follow up.
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> > static void sanitize_hwsp(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > @@ -606,6 +1070,46 @@ static void guc_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > engine->submit_request = guc_submit_request;
> > }
> > +static inline void guc_kernel_context_pin(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > + struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > + if (context_guc_id_invalid(ce))
> > + pin_guc_id(guc, ce);
> > + guc_lrc_desc_pin(ce);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void guc_init_lrc_mapping(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> > + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> > + enum intel_engine_id id;
> > +
> > + /* make sure all descriptors are clean... */
> > + xa_destroy(&guc->context_lookup);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Some contexts might have been pinned before we enabled GuC
> > + * submission, so we need to add them to the GuC bookeeping.
> > + * Also, after a reset the GuC we want to make sure that the information
> > + * shared with GuC is properly reset. The kernel lrcs are not attached
> > + * to the gem_context, so they need to be added separately.
> > + *
> > + * Note: we purposely do not check the error return of
> > + * guc_lrc_desc_pin, because that function can only fail in two cases.
> > + * One, if there aren't enough free IDs, but we're guaranteed to have
> > + * enough here (we're either only pinning a handful of lrc on first boot
> > + * or we're re-pinning lrcs that were already pinned before the reset).
> > + * Two, if the GuC has died and CTBs can't make forward progress.
> > + * Presumably, the GuC should be alive as this function is called on
> > + * driver load or after a reset. Even if it is dead, another full GPU
> > + * reset will be triggered and this function would be called again.
> > + */
> > +
> > + for_each_engine(engine, gt, id)
> > + if (engine->kernel_context)
> > + guc_kernel_context_pin(guc, engine->kernel_context);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void guc_release(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > {
> > engine->sanitize = NULL; /* no longer in control, nothing to sanitize */
> > @@ -718,6 +1222,7 @@ int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > void intel_guc_submission_enable(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > {
> > + guc_init_lrc_mapping(guc);
> > }
> > void intel_guc_submission_disable(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > @@ -743,3 +1248,62 @@ void intel_guc_submission_init_early(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > {
> > guc->submission_selected = __guc_submission_selected(guc);
> > }
> > +
> > +static inline struct intel_context *
> > +g2h_context_lookup(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 desc_idx)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_context *ce;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(desc_idx >= GUC_MAX_LRC_DESCRIPTORS)) {
> > + drm_dbg(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> > + "Invalid desc_idx %u", desc_idx);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ce = __get_context(guc, desc_idx);
> > + if (unlikely(!ce)) {
> > + drm_dbg(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> > + "Context is NULL, desc_idx %u", desc_idx);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ce;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > + const u32 *msg,
> > + u32 len)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_context *ce;
> > + u32 desc_idx = msg[0];
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(len < 1)) {
> > + drm_dbg(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm, "Invalid length %u", len);
> > + return -EPROTO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ce = g2h_context_lookup(guc, desc_idx);
> > + if (unlikely(!ce))
> > + return -EPROTO;
> > +
> > + if (context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce)) {
> > + struct intel_runtime_pm *runtime_pm =
> > + &ce->engine->gt->i915->runtime_pm;
> > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Previous owner of this guc_id has been deregistered, now safe
> > + * register this context.
> > + */
> > + with_intel_runtime_pm(runtime_pm, wakeref)
> > + register_context(ce);
> > + clr_context_wait_for_deregister_to_register(ce);
> > + intel_context_put(ce);
> > + } else if (context_destroyed(ce)) {
> > + /* Context has been destroyed */
> > + release_guc_id(guc, ce);
> > + lrc_destroy(&ce->ref);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 943fe485c662..204c95c39353 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -4142,6 +4142,7 @@ enum {
> > FAULT_AND_CONTINUE /* Unsupported */
> > };
> > +#define CTX_GTT_ADDRESS_MASK GENMASK(31, 12)
> > #define GEN8_CTX_VALID (1 << 0)
> > #define GEN8_CTX_FORCE_PD_RESTORE (1 << 1)
> > #define GEN8_CTX_FORCE_RESTORE (1 << 2)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> > index 86b4c9f2613d..b48c4905d3fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> > @@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
> > */
> > if (!list_empty(&rq->sched.link))
> > remove_from_engine(rq);
> > + atomic_dec(&rq->context->guc_id_ref);
>
> Does this work/make sense if GuC is disabled?
>
It doesn't matter if the GuC is disabled as this var isn't used if it
is. A following patch adds a vfunc here and pushes this in the GuC
backend.
Matt
> Daniele
>
> > GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
> > __list_del_entry(&rq->link); /* poison neither prev/next (RCU walks) */
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list