[PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: fix build failure with CONFIG_BACKLIGHT=n

Karol Herbst kherbst at redhat.com
Fri Jul 23 10:10:24 UTC 2021


On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:24 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:15 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> >
> > When the backlight support is disabled, the driver fails to build:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c: In function 'nv50_sor_atomic_disable':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1665:59: error: 'struct nouveau_connector' has no member named 'backlight'
> >  1665 |         struct nouveau_backlight *backlight = nv_connector->backlight;
> >       |                                                           ^~
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1670:35: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct nouveau_backlight'
> >  1670 |         if (backlight && backlight->uses_dpcd) {
> >       |                                   ^~
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1671:64: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct nouveau_backlight'
> >  1671 |                 ret = drm_edp_backlight_disable(aux, &backlight->edp_info);
> >       |                                                                ^~
> >
> > The patch that introduced the problem already contains some #ifdef
> > checks, so just add another one that makes it build again.
> >
> > Fixes: 6eca310e8924 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Add basic DPCD backlight support for nouveau")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
>
> Can we just toss the idea that BACKTLIGHT=n is a reasonable config for
> drm drivers using backlights, and add depends BACKLIGHT to all of
> them?
>
> I mean this is a perfect source of continued patch streams to keep us
> all busy, but beyond that I really don't see the point ... I frankly
> have better things to do, and especially with the big drivers we have
> making backlight optional saves comparitively nothing.
> -Daniel
>

same, I'd just require BACKLIGHT as well tbh.

> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 11 +++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> > index 093e1f7163b3..fcf53e24db21 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> > @@ -1659,20 +1659,23 @@ static void
> >  nv50_sor_atomic_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> >  {
> >         struct nouveau_encoder *nv_encoder = nouveau_encoder(encoder);
> > -       struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(nv_encoder->base.base.dev);
> >         struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc = nouveau_crtc(nv_encoder->crtc);
> >         struct nouveau_connector *nv_connector = nv50_outp_get_old_connector(state, nv_encoder);
> > -       struct nouveau_backlight *backlight = nv_connector->backlight;
> >         struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &nv_connector->aux;
> > -       int ret;
> >         u8 pwr;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU_BACKLIGHT
> > +       struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(nv_encoder->base.base.dev);
> > +       struct nouveau_backlight *backlight = nv_connector->backlight;
> > +
> >         if (backlight && backlight->uses_dpcd) {
> > -               ret = drm_edp_backlight_disable(aux, &backlight->edp_info);
> > +               int ret = drm_edp_backlight_disable(aux, &backlight->edp_info);
> > +
> >                 if (ret < 0)
> >                         NV_ERROR(drm, "Failed to disable backlight on [CONNECTOR:%d:%s]: %d\n",
> >                                  nv_connector->base.base.id, nv_connector->base.name, ret);
> >         }
> > +#endif
> >
> >         if (nv_encoder->dcb->type == DCB_OUTPUT_DP) {
> >                 int ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_SET_POWER, &pwr);
> > --
> > 2.29.2
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>



More information about the dri-devel mailing list