[PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add debugfs for SLPC info

Belgaumkar, Vinay vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com
Fri Jul 23 19:49:04 UTC 2021



On 7/21/2021 11:05 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21.07.2021 18:11, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>> This prints out relevant SLPC info from the SLPC shared structure.
>>
>> We will send a h2g message which forces SLPC to update the
>> shared data structure with latest information before reading it.
>>
>> v2: Address review comments (Michal W)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c    | 23 +++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h   |  4 +-
>>   3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
>> index 72ddfff42f7d..46b22187927b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>   #include "gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h"
>>   #include "gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.h"
>>   #include "gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h"
>> +#include "gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h"
>>   
>>   static int guc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>>   {
>> @@ -50,11 +51,33 @@ static int guc_registered_contexts_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>>   }
>>   DEFINE_GT_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(guc_registered_contexts);
>>   
>> +static int guc_slpc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>> +{
>> +	struct intel_guc *guc = m->private;
>> +	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = &guc->slpc;
>> +	struct drm_printer p = drm_seq_file_printer(m);
>> +
>> +	if (!intel_guc_slpc_is_used(guc))
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	return intel_guc_slpc_info(slpc, &p);
>> +}
>> +DEFINE_GT_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(guc_slpc_info);
>> +
>> +bool intel_eval_slpc_support(void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct intel_guc *guc;
>> +
>> +	guc = (struct intel_guc *)data;
> 
> 	struct intel_guc *guc = (struct intel_guc *)data;
> 
>> +	return intel_guc_slpc_is_used(guc);
>> +}
>> +
>>   void intel_guc_debugfs_register(struct intel_guc *guc, struct dentry *root)
>>   {
>>   	static const struct debugfs_gt_file files[] = {
>>   		{ "guc_info", &guc_info_fops, NULL },
>>   		{ "guc_registered_contexts", &guc_registered_contexts_fops, NULL },
>> +		{ "guc_slpc_info", &guc_slpc_info_fops, &intel_eval_slpc_support},
>>   	};
>>   
>>   	if (!intel_guc_is_supported(guc))
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
>> index c1cf8d46e360..73379985c105 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
>> @@ -430,6 +430,46 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +int intel_guc_slpc_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = guc_to_gt(slpc_to_guc(slpc))->i915;
>> +	struct slpc_shared_data *data;
>> +	struct slpc_task_state_data *slpc_tasks;
>> +	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
>> +		if (slpc_query_task_state(slpc))
>> +			return -EIO;
> 
> not sure if you can return directly from "with_rpm"

Good point, checking err instead.

> 
>> +
>> +		slpc_tasks = &data->task_state_data;
>> +
>> +		drm_printf(p, "SLPC state: %s\n", slpc_state_string(slpc));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tgtperf task active: %s\n",
>> +			yesno(slpc_tasks->status & SLPC_GTPERF_TASK_ACTIVE));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tdcc task active: %s\n",
>> +			yesno(slpc_tasks->status & SLPC_DCC_TASK_ACTIVE));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tin dcc: %s\n",
>> +			yesno(slpc_tasks->status & SLPC_IN_DCC));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tfreq switch active: %s\n",
>> +			yesno(slpc_tasks->status & SLPC_FREQ_SWITCH_ACTIVE));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tibc enabled: %s\n",
>> +			yesno(slpc_tasks->status & SLPC_IBC_ENABLED));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tibc active: %s\n",
>> +			yesno(slpc_tasks->status & SLPC_IBC_ACTIVE));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tpg1 enabled: %s\n",
>> +			yesno(slpc_tasks->status & SLPC_PG1_ENABLED));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tpg1 active: %s\n",
>> +			yesno(slpc_tasks->status & SLPC_PG1_ACTIVE));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tmax freq: %dMHz\n",
>> +				slpc_decode_max_freq(slpc));
>> +		drm_printf(p, "\tmin freq: %dMHz\n",
>> +				slpc_decode_min_freq(slpc));
> 
> not sure what they are:
> 
> DCC ?
> IBC ?
> PG1 ?

Removed these for now, since we don't use/enable them yet anyways.

> 
> and make sure to use %u for unsigned

Ok.
Thanks,
Vinay.

> 
> Michal
> 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>   void intel_guc_slpc_fini(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>>   {
>>   	if (!slpc->vma)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
>> index 627c71a95777..852c6316aa47 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>>   #include "intel_guc_slpc_types.h"
>>   #include "abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h"
>>   
>> +struct drm_printer;
>> +
>>   static inline bool intel_guc_slpc_is_supported(struct intel_guc *guc)
>>   {
>>   	return guc->slpc_supported;
>> @@ -26,7 +28,6 @@ static inline bool intel_guc_slpc_is_used(struct intel_guc *guc)
>>   }
>>   
>>   void intel_guc_slpc_init_early(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
>> -
>>   int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
>>   int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
>>   void intel_guc_slpc_fini(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
>> @@ -34,5 +35,6 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
>>   int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
>>   int intel_guc_slpc_get_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
>>   int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
>> +int intel_guc_slpc_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
>>   
>>   #endif
>>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list