[PATCH 33/64] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY
Randy Dunlap
rdunlap at infradead.org
Tue Jul 27 23:33:30 UTC 2021
On 7/27/21 4:31 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 7/27/21 1:58 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> +static int __init test_memcpy_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int err = 0;
>> +
>> + err |= test_memcpy();
>> + err |= test_memmove();
>> + err |= test_memset();
>> +
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_warn("FAIL!\n");
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + } else {
>> + pr_info("all tests passed\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit test_memcpy_exit(void)
>> +{ }
>> +
>> +module_init(test_memcpy_init);
>> +module_exit(test_memcpy_exit);
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> Has it been considered to implement this test using the Kunit framework?
and do we want everything converted to use the Kunit test framework?
My answer is No, we don't, but I could easily be in the minority.
--
~Randy
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list