[PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable SLPC and add related H2G events

Michal Wajdeczko michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Thu Jul 29 15:48:11 UTC 2021



On 28.07.2021 23:11, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Add methods for interacting with GuC for enabling SLPC. Enable
> SLPC after GuC submission has been established. GuC load will
> fail if SLPC cannot be successfully initialized. Add various
> helper methods to set/unset the parameters for SLPC. They can
> be set using H2G calls or directly setting bits in the shared
> data structure.
> 
> v2: Address several review comments, add new helpers for
> decoding the SLPC min/max frequencies. Use masks instead of hardcoded
> constants. (Michal W)
> 
> v3: Split global_state_to_string function, and check for positive
> non-zero return value from intel_guc_send() (Michal W)
> 
> v4: Optimize the stringify function and other comments (Michal W)
> 
> v5: Enable slpc as well before declaring GuC submission status (Michal W)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 226 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h |   2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c         |  11 +
>  3 files changed, 239 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> index 6d76ea4c0ace..da3e1f8844a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,40 @@ void intel_guc_slpc_init_early(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  	slpc->selected = __guc_slpc_selected(guc);
>  }
>  
> +static void slpc_mem_set_param(struct slpc_shared_data *data,
> +				u32 id, u32 value)
> +{
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(id >= SLPC_MAX_OVERRIDE_PARAMETERS);
> +	/*
> +	 * When the flag bit is set, corresponding value will be read
> +	 * and applied by SLPC.
> +	 */
> +	data->override_params.bits[id >> 5] |= (1 << (id % 32));
> +	data->override_params.values[id] = value;
> +}
> +
> +static void slpc_mem_set_enabled(struct slpc_shared_data *data,
> +				u8 enable_id, u8 disable_id)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Enabling a param involves setting the enable_id
> +	 * to 1 and disable_id to 0.
> +	 */
> +	slpc_mem_set_param(data, enable_id, 1);
> +	slpc_mem_set_param(data, disable_id, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void slpc_mem_set_disabled(struct slpc_shared_data *data,
> +				u8 enable_id, u8 disable_id)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Disabling a param involves setting the enable_id
> +	 * to 0 and disable_id to 1.
> +	 */
> +	slpc_mem_set_param(data, disable_id, 1);
> +	slpc_mem_set_param(data, enable_id, 0);
> +}
> +
>  static int slpc_shared_data_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  {
>  	struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
> @@ -63,6 +97,121 @@ static int slpc_shared_data_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> +static u32 slpc_get_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> +	struct slpc_shared_data *data;
> +
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma);
> +
> +	drm_clflush_virt_range(slpc->vaddr, sizeof(u32));
> +	data = slpc->vaddr;
> +
> +	return data->header.global_state;
> +}
> +
> +static bool slpc_is_running(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> +	return slpc_get_state(slpc) == SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RUNNING;
> +}
> +
> +static int guc_action_slpc_query(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 offset)
> +{
> +	u32 request[] = {
> +		GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_PC_SLPC_REQUEST,
> +		SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_QUERY_TASK_STATE, 2),
> +		offset,
> +		0,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = intel_guc_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request));
> +
> +	return ret > 0 ? -EPROTO : ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int slpc_query_task_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> +	struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
> +	u32 offset = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, slpc->vma);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = guc_action_slpc_query(guc, offset);
> +	if (ret)

unlikely(ret) ?

> +		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to query task state (%pe)\n",
> +				ERR_PTR(ret));

is this indent correct ?

> +
> +	drm_clflush_virt_range(slpc->vaddr, SLPC_PAGE_SIZE_BYTES);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const char *slpc_global_state_to_string(enum slpc_global_state state)
> +{
> +	switch (state) {
> +	case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_NOT_RUNNING:
> +		return "not running";
> +	case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_INITIALIZING:
> +		return "initializing";
> +	case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RESETTING:
> +		return "resetting";
> +	case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RUNNING:
> +		return "running";
> +	case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_SHUTTING_DOWN:
> +		return "shutting down";
> +	case SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_ERROR:
> +		return "error";
> +	default:
> +		return "unknown";
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static const char *slpc_get_state_string(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> +	return slpc_global_state_to_string(slpc_get_state(slpc));
> +}
> +
> +static int guc_action_slpc_reset(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 offset)
> +{
> +	u32 request[] = {
> +		GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_PC_SLPC_REQUEST,
> +		SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_RESET, 2),
> +		offset,
> +		0,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = intel_guc_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request));
> +
> +	return ret > 0 ? -EPROTO : ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int slpc_reset(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
> +	struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
> +	u32 offset = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, slpc->vma);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = guc_action_slpc_reset(guc, offset);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> +		drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC reset action failed (%pe)\n",
> +					ERR_PTR(ret));

same here

> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		if (wait_for(slpc_is_running(slpc), SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS)) {
> +			drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC not enabled! State = %s\n",
> +				  slpc_get_state_string(slpc));
> +			return -EIO;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  {
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(slpc->vma);
> @@ -70,6 +219,83 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  	return slpc_shared_data_init(slpc);
>  }
>  
> +static u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> +	struct slpc_shared_data *data = slpc->vaddr;
> +
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma);
> +
> +	return	DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(

double space  ^^

> +		REG_FIELD_GET(SLPC_MIN_UNSLICE_FREQ_MASK,
> +			data->task_state_data.freq) *
> +		GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER, GEN9_FREQ_SCALER);

and here

> +}
> +
> +static u32 slpc_decode_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> +	struct slpc_shared_data *data = slpc->vaddr;
> +
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma);
> +
> +	return	DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(

double space  ^^

> +		REG_FIELD_GET(SLPC_MAX_UNSLICE_FREQ_MASK,
> +			data->task_state_data.freq) *
> +		GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER, GEN9_FREQ_SCALER);
> +}
> +
> +static void slpc_shared_data_reset(struct slpc_shared_data *data)
> +{
> +	memset(data, 0, sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data));
> +
> +	data->header.size = sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data);
> +
> +	/* Enable only GTPERF task, disable others */
> +	slpc_mem_set_enabled(data, SLPC_PARAM_TASK_ENABLE_GTPERF,
> +				SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DISABLE_GTPERF);
> +
> +	slpc_mem_set_disabled(data, SLPC_PARAM_TASK_ENABLE_BALANCER,
> +				SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DISABLE_BALANCER);
> +
> +	slpc_mem_set_disabled(data, SLPC_PARAM_TASK_ENABLE_DCC,
> +				SLPC_PARAM_TASK_DISABLE_DCC);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * intel_guc_slpc_enable() - Start SLPC
> + * @slpc: pointer to intel_guc_slpc.
> + *
> + * SLPC is enabled by setting up the shared data structure and
> + * sending reset event to GuC SLPC. Initial data is setup in
> + * intel_guc_slpc_init. Here we send the reset event. We do
> + * not currently need a slpc_disable since this is taken care
> + * of automatically when a reset/suspend occurs and the GuC
> + * CTB is destroyed.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, non-zero error code on failure.
> + */
> +int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma);
> +
> +	slpc_shared_data_reset(slpc->vaddr);
> +
> +	ret = slpc_reset(slpc);
> +	if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> +		drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC Reset event returned (%pe)\n",
> +				ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = slpc_query_task_state(slpc);
> +	if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  void intel_guc_slpc_fini(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  {
>  	if (!slpc->vma)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
> index 8bd753167234..3cefe19b17b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
> +#define SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS 5
> +
>  struct intel_guc_slpc {
>  	struct i915_vma *vma;
>  	struct slpc_shared_data *vaddr;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> index e6bd9406c7b2..3e0cd1f05e3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> @@ -500,12 +500,21 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc)
>  	if (intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(uc))
>  		intel_guc_submission_enable(guc);
>  
> +	if (intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(uc)) {
> +		ret = intel_guc_slpc_enable(&guc->slpc);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err_submission;
> +	}
> +
>  	drm_info(&i915->drm, "%s firmware %s version %u.%u %s:%s\n",
>  		 intel_uc_fw_type_repr(INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC), guc->fw.path,
>  		 guc->fw.major_ver_found, guc->fw.minor_ver_found,
>  		 "submission",
>  		 enableddisabled(intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(uc)));
>  
> +	drm_info(&i915->drm, "GuC SLPC: %s\n",
> +		 enableddisabled(intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(uc)));
> +
>  	if (intel_uc_uses_huc(uc)) {
>  		drm_info(&i915->drm, "%s firmware %s version %u.%u %s:%s\n",
>  			 intel_uc_fw_type_repr(INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC),
> @@ -520,6 +529,8 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc)
>  	/*
>  	 * We've failed to load the firmware :(
>  	 */
> +err_submission:
> +	intel_guc_submission_disable(guc);
>  err_log_capture:
>  	__uc_capture_load_err_log(uc);
>  err_out:
> 

make sure checkpatch.pl is happy with indents, with that

Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list