[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Update i915_scheduler to operate on i915_sched_engine
Jason Ekstrand
jason at jlekstrand.net
Fri Jun 4 19:17:58 UTC 2021
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:09 PM Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Rather passing around an intel_engine_cs in the scheduling code, pass
> around a i915_sched_engine.
👍
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 11 +++--
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 46 +++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> index 3fac17103837..7240c153be35 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,8 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> GEM_BUG_ON(rq_prio(rq) == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID);
> if (rq_prio(rq) != prio) {
> prio = rq_prio(rq);
> - pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
> + pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine->sched_engine,
> + prio);
> }
> GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sched_engine_is_empty(engine->sched_engine));
>
> @@ -1096,7 +1097,8 @@ static void defer_active(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (!rq)
> return;
>
> - defer_request(rq, i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, rq_prio(rq)));
> + defer_request(rq, i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine->sched_engine,
> + rq_prio(rq)));
> }
>
> static bool
> @@ -2083,7 +2085,7 @@ static void __execlists_unhold(struct i915_request *rq)
>
> i915_request_clear_hold(rq);
> list_move_tail(&rq->sched.link,
> - i915_sched_lookup_priolist(rq->engine,
> + i915_sched_lookup_priolist(rq->engine->sched_engine,
> rq_prio(rq)));
> set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
>
> @@ -2452,7 +2454,8 @@ static void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> {
> GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
> list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link,
> - i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, rq_prio(rq)));
> + i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine->sched_engine,
> + rq_prio(rq)));
> set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 4c5bbec0775d..7ed21670ef14 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static inline void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> {
> GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
> list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link,
> - i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio));
> + i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine->sched_engine, prio));
> set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> index 035b88f2e4aa..3d36e4447b5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> @@ -61,14 +61,13 @@ static void assert_priolists(struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine)
> }
>
> struct list_head *
> -i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
> +i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine, int prio)
> {
> - struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine = engine->sched_engine;
> struct i915_priolist *p;
> struct rb_node **parent, *rb;
> bool first = true;
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&engine->sched_engine->lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&sched_engine->lock);
> assert_priolists(sched_engine);
>
> if (unlikely(sched_engine->no_priolist))
> @@ -130,13 +129,13 @@ struct sched_cache {
> struct list_head *priolist;
> };
>
> -static struct intel_engine_cs *
> -sched_lock_engine(const struct i915_sched_node *node,
> - struct intel_engine_cs *locked,
> +static struct i915_sched_engine *
> +lock_sched_engine(struct i915_sched_node *node,
> + struct i915_sched_engine *locked,
> struct sched_cache *cache)
> {
> const struct i915_request *rq = node_to_request(node);
> - struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> + struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine;
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(!locked);
>
> @@ -146,14 +145,14 @@ sched_lock_engine(const struct i915_sched_node *node,
> * engine lock. The simple ploy we use is to take the lock then
> * check that the rq still belongs to the newly locked engine.
> */
> - while (locked != (engine = READ_ONCE(rq->engine))) {
> - spin_unlock(&locked->sched_engine->lock);
> + while (locked != (sched_engine = rq->engine->sched_engine)) {
You lost the READ_ONCE here. Based on the comment above, that may
matter. I guess it depends on what all barriers spin_lock() implies.
Assuming that's all good,
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net>
> + spin_unlock(&locked->lock);
> memset(cache, 0, sizeof(*cache));
> - spin_lock(&engine->sched_engine->lock);
> - locked = engine;
> + spin_lock(&sched_engine->lock);
> + locked = sched_engine;
> }
>
> - GEM_BUG_ON(locked != engine);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(locked != sched_engine);
> return locked;
> }
>
> @@ -161,7 +160,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
> const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
> {
> const int prio = max(attr->priority, node->attr.priority);
> - struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> + struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine;
> struct i915_dependency *dep, *p;
> struct i915_dependency stack;
> struct sched_cache cache;
> @@ -236,23 +235,24 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
> }
>
> memset(&cache, 0, sizeof(cache));
> - engine = node_to_request(node)->engine;
> - spin_lock(&engine->sched_engine->lock);
> + sched_engine = node_to_request(node)->engine->sched_engine;
> + spin_lock(&sched_engine->lock);
>
> /* Fifo and depth-first replacement ensure our deps execute before us */
> - engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine, &cache);
> + sched_engine = lock_sched_engine(node, sched_engine, &cache);
> list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(dep, p, &dfs, dfs_link) {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dep->dfs_link);
>
> node = dep->signaler;
> - engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine, &cache);
> - lockdep_assert_held(&engine->sched_engine->lock);
> + sched_engine = lock_sched_engine(node, sched_engine, &cache);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&sched_engine->lock);
>
> /* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
> if (prio <= node->attr.priority || node_signaled(node))
> continue;
>
> - GEM_BUG_ON(node_to_request(node)->engine != engine);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(node_to_request(node)->engine->sched_engine !=
> + sched_engine);
>
> WRITE_ONCE(node->attr.priority, prio);
>
> @@ -270,17 +270,17 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
> if (i915_request_in_priority_queue(node_to_request(node))) {
> if (!cache.priolist)
> cache.priolist =
> - i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine,
> + i915_sched_lookup_priolist(sched_engine,
> prio);
> list_move_tail(&node->link, cache.priolist);
> }
>
> /* Defer (tasklet) submission until after all of our updates. */
> - if (engine->sched_engine->kick_backend)
> - engine->sched_engine->kick_backend(node_to_request(node), prio);
> + if (sched_engine->kick_backend)
> + sched_engine->kick_backend(node_to_request(node), prio);
> }
>
> - spin_unlock(&engine->sched_engine->lock);
> + spin_unlock(&sched_engine->lock);
> }
>
> void i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq, const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> index 713c38c99de9..0014745bda30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void i915_schedule(struct i915_request *request,
> const struct i915_sched_attr *attr);
>
> struct list_head *
> -i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio);
> +i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine, int prio);
>
> void __i915_priolist_free(struct i915_priolist *p);
> static inline void i915_priolist_free(struct i915_priolist *p)
> --
> 2.28.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list