[PATCH v3] backlight: ktd253: Stabilize backlight

Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson at linaro.org
Mon Jun 7 11:11:35 UTC 2021


On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 08:32:01AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Remove interrupt disablement during backlight setting. It is
> way to dangerous and makes platforms instable by having it
> miss vblank IRQs leading to the graphics derailing.
> 
> The code is using ndelay() which is not available on
> platforms such as ARM and will result in 32 * udelay(1)
> which is substantial.
> 
> Add some code to detect if an interrupt occurs during the
> tight loop and in that case just redo it from the top.
> 
> Fixes: 5317f37e48b9 ("backlight: Add Kinetic KTD253 backlight driver")
> Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan at gerhold.net>
> Reported-by: newbyte at disroot.org
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson at linaro.org>


Daniel.


> ---
> ChangeLog v2->v3:
> - Read my own patch and realized a bug: when we get a timeout
>   we bounce back to max period, but still count down the pwm
>   with one leading to an off-by-one error. Fix it by extending
>   some else clauses.
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Alter the dimming code to check for how many ns the pulse
>   is low, and if it gets to ~100 us then redo from start.
>   This is to account for the advent that an IRQ arrives while
>   setting backlight and hits the low pulse making it way
>   too long.
> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/ktd253-backlight.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/ktd253-backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/ktd253-backlight.c
> index a7df5bcca9da..37aa5a669530 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/ktd253-backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/ktd253-backlight.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  
>  #define KTD253_T_LOW_NS (200 + 10) /* Additional 10ns as safety factor */
>  #define KTD253_T_HIGH_NS (200 + 10) /* Additional 10ns as safety factor */
> +#define KTD253_T_OFF_CRIT_NS 100000 /* 100 us, now it doesn't look good */
>  #define KTD253_T_OFF_MS 3
>  
>  struct ktd253_backlight {
> @@ -34,13 +35,50 @@ struct ktd253_backlight {
>  	u16 ratio;
>  };
>  
> +static void ktd253_backlight_set_max_ratio(struct ktd253_backlight *ktd253)
> +{
> +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ktd253->gpiod, 1);
> +	ndelay(KTD253_T_HIGH_NS);
> +	/* We always fall back to this when we power on */
> +}
> +
> +static int ktd253_backlight_stepdown(struct ktd253_backlight *ktd253)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * These GPIO operations absolutely can NOT sleep so no _cansleep
> +	 * suffixes, and no using GPIO expanders on slow buses for this!
> +	 *
> +	 * The maximum number of cycles of the loop is 32  so the time taken
> +	 * should nominally be:
> +	 * (T_LOW_NS + T_HIGH_NS + loop_time) * 32
> +	 *
> +	 * Architectures do not always support ndelay() and we will get a few us
> +	 * instead. If we get to a critical time limit an interrupt has likely
> +	 * occured in the low part of the loop and we need to restart from the
> +	 * top so we have the backlight in a known state.
> +	 */
> +	u64 ns;
> +
> +	ns = ktime_get_ns();
> +	gpiod_set_value(ktd253->gpiod, 0);
> +	ndelay(KTD253_T_LOW_NS);
> +	gpiod_set_value(ktd253->gpiod, 1);
> +	ns = ktime_get_ns() - ns;
> +	if (ns >= KTD253_T_OFF_CRIT_NS) {
> +		dev_err(ktd253->dev, "PCM on backlight took too long (%llu ns)\n", ns);
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +	}
> +	ndelay(KTD253_T_HIGH_NS);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int ktd253_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
>  {
>  	struct ktd253_backlight *ktd253 = bl_get_data(bl);
>  	int brightness = backlight_get_brightness(bl);
>  	u16 target_ratio;
>  	u16 current_ratio = ktd253->ratio;
> -	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(ktd253->dev, "new brightness/ratio: %d/32\n", brightness);
>  
> @@ -62,37 +100,34 @@ static int ktd253_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (current_ratio == 0) {
> -		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ktd253->gpiod, 1);
> -		ndelay(KTD253_T_HIGH_NS);
> -		/* We always fall back to this when we power on */
> +		ktd253_backlight_set_max_ratio(ktd253);
>  		current_ratio = KTD253_MAX_RATIO;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * WARNING:
> -	 * The loop to set the correct current level is performed
> -	 * with interrupts disabled as it is timing critical.
> -	 * The maximum number of cycles of the loop is 32
> -	 * so the time taken will be (T_LOW_NS + T_HIGH_NS + loop_time) * 32,
> -	 */
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
>  	while (current_ratio != target_ratio) {
>  		/*
>  		 * These GPIO operations absolutely can NOT sleep so no
>  		 * _cansleep suffixes, and no using GPIO expanders on
>  		 * slow buses for this!
>  		 */
> -		gpiod_set_value(ktd253->gpiod, 0);
> -		ndelay(KTD253_T_LOW_NS);
> -		gpiod_set_value(ktd253->gpiod, 1);
> -		ndelay(KTD253_T_HIGH_NS);
> -		/* After 1/32 we loop back to 32/32 */
> -		if (current_ratio == KTD253_MIN_RATIO)
> +		ret = ktd253_backlight_stepdown(ktd253);
> +		if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Something disturbed the backlight setting code when
> +			 * running so we need to bring the PWM back to a known
> +			 * state. This shouldn't happen too much.
> +			 */
> +			gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ktd253->gpiod, 0);
> +			msleep(KTD253_T_OFF_MS);
> +			ktd253_backlight_set_max_ratio(ktd253);
> +			current_ratio = KTD253_MAX_RATIO;
> +		} else if (current_ratio == KTD253_MIN_RATIO) {
> +			/* After 1/32 we loop back to 32/32 */
>  			current_ratio = KTD253_MAX_RATIO;
> -		else
> +		} else {
>  			current_ratio--;
> +		}
>  	}
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  	ktd253->ratio = current_ratio;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(ktd253->dev, "new ratio set to %d/32\n", target_ratio);
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 


More information about the dri-devel mailing list