[PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB registration action
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Thu Jun 10 13:19:50 UTC 2021
On 10.06.2021 06:38, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:07:21PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09.06.2021 19:36, John Harrison wrote:
>>> On 6/7/2021 18:23, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>>>> On 6/7/2021 11:03 AM, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>>>> From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Definition of the CTB registration action has changed.
>>>>> Add some ABI documentation and implement required changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski at intel.com> #4
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h | 107 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> .../gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h | 4 -
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 76 ++++++++-----
>>>>> 3 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
>>>>> index 90efef8a73e4..6426fc183692 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
>>>>> @@ -6,6 +6,113 @@
>>>>> #ifndef _ABI_GUC_ACTIONS_ABI_H
>>>>> #define _ABI_GUC_ACTIONS_ABI_H
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * DOC: HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This message is used as part of the `CTB based communication`_
>>>>> setup.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This message must be sent as `MMIO HXG Message`_.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | | Bits |
>>>>> Description |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +===+=======+==============================================================+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | 0 | 31 | ORIGIN =
>>>>> GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST_ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 30:28 | TYPE =
>>>>> GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST_ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 27:16 | DATA0 =
>>>>> MBZ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 15:0 | ACTION = _`GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB` =
>>>>> 0x5200 |
>>>>
>>>> Specs says 4505
>>>>
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | 1 | 31:12 | RESERVED =
>>>>> MBZ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 11:8 | **TYPE** - type for the `CT
>>>>> Buffer`_ |
>>>>> + * | |
>>>>> | |
>>>>> + * | | | - _`GUC_CTB_TYPE_HOST2GUC` =
>>>>> 0 |
>>>>> + * | | | - _`GUC_CTB_TYPE_GUC2HOST` =
>>>>> 1 |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 7:0 | **SIZE** - size of the `CT Buffer`_ in 4K units
>>>>> minus 1 |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | 2 | 31:0 | **DESC_ADDR** - GGTT address of the `CTB
>>>>> Descriptor`_ |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | 3 | 31:0 | **BUFF_ADDF** - GGTT address of the `CT
>>>>> Buffer`_ |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> +*
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | | Bits |
>>>>> Description |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +===+=======+==============================================================+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | 0 | 31 | ORIGIN =
>>>>> GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC_ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 30:28 | TYPE =
>>>>> GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS_ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 27:0 | DATA0 =
>>>>> MBZ |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +#define GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB 0x4505 // FIXME 0x5200
>>>>
>>>> Why FIXME? AFAICS the specs still says 4505, even if we plan to update
>>>> at some point I don;t think this deserves a FIXME since nothing is
>>>> incorrect.
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_LEN
>>>>> (GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_MIN_LEN + 3u)
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_0_MBZ
>>>>> GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_1_MBZ (0xfffff << 12)
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_1_TYPE (0xf << 8)
>>>>> +#define GUC_CTB_TYPE_HOST2GUC 0u
>>>>> +#define GUC_CTB_TYPE_GUC2HOST 1u
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_1_SIZE (0xff << 0)
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_2_DESC_ADDR
>>>>> GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_n_DATAn
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_3_BUFF_ADDR
>>>>> GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_n_DATAn
>>>>
>>>> The full mask still seems like overkill to me and I still think we
>>>> should use BIT()/GENMASK() and a _MASK prefix, but not going to block
>>>> on it.
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_RESPONSE_MSG_LEN
>>>>> GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_MIN_LEN
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_RESPONSE_MSG_0_MBZ
>>>>> GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_0_DATA0
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * DOC: HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This message is used as part of the `CTB based communication`_
>>>>> teardown.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This message must be sent as `MMIO HXG Message`_.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | | Bits |
>>>>> Description |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +===+=======+==============================================================+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | 0 | 31 | ORIGIN =
>>>>> GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST_ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 30:28 | TYPE =
>>>>> GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST_ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 27:16 | DATA0 =
>>>>> MBZ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 15:0 | ACTION = _`GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB` =
>>>>> 0x5201 |
>>>>
>>>> Specs says 4506
>>>>
>>> I would say that the enum value should not be included in the structure
>>> definition. I would also argue that there is no point in repeating the
>>> common header structure for every single H2G action definition. That is
>>> just overly verbose and makes it harder to read the spec. It implies
>>> that every action has a different header structure and must be coded
>>> individually.
>>
>> but some actions are defined as REQUEST some as EVENT, so we need to say
>> that, also each REQUEST action may define its own DATA0, so again we
>> still need to define these bits somewhere
>>
>>>
>>> Personally, I don't believe we should be replicating the entire GuC API
>>> spec in the driver header files anyway. This is not something that is
>>> defined by the i915 driver so the i915 driver should not be defining it!
>>> Instead, just include a link or pointer to where the actual spec can be
>>> found. We don't copy the entire bspec page for every register that the
>>> driver touches, so why should this be any different?
>
> I agree with John on this one. We plan publishing the GuC, right? Let's
Do you know of any ETA? I don't
and likely the same promise was given few years back when GuC was
introduced in upstream, I don't want to have just code that we can't
compare with specification (in any form)
> just point to it in the kernel DOC.
>
> Also at some all these defines really should be auto-generated. I
> suppose if these headers are auto-generated, I could live with these
I was also hoping to get these ABI headers auto-generated before we
start to used them for good, unfortunately it was quite the opposite:
for some time these hand crafted tables were used as input for
discussion and then to prepare machine readable formats, but the only
tool currently available (and still WIP) is for generating spec
documentation
> files generating kernel DOC. I can't really live with having to maintain
> a table like this for every action manually.
the goal is to freeze ABI so no maintenance will be necessary, except
adding new actions, and that's also the reason to keep these ABI files
separate from the rest of our headers, where we can add/modify/improve
any helpers/wrappers as we want.
and I don't recall that you were forced to modify any of such tables
yet, nor were asked to manually prepare them for the rest of the
existing actions, especially GuC submission ones, so why complain?
>
> Matt
>
>>
>> to some extend we have to replicate at least part of the GuC ABI spec,
>> part that defines all bits, and IMHO there is nothing wrong if it comes
>> with full message layout definitions, especially if you compare that
>> with previous approach, were H2G action definitions were limited just to
>> single enum value (and to find out how to use given H2G you had to look
>> into firmware source code)
>>
>> so while we keep these abi.h files in kernel repo, they shall be treated
>> as read-only imported external interface definitions, from which we just
>> use all #define for coding and DOC: for documentation (latter at least
>> until GuC will release its spec to the public)
>>
>>>
>>> John.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | 1 | 31:12 | RESERVED =
>>>>> MBZ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 11:8 | **TYPE** - type of the `CT
>>>>> Buffer`_ |
>>>>> + * | |
>>>>> | |
>>>>> + * | | | see
>>>>> `GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB`_ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 7:0 | RESERVED =
>>>>> MBZ |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> +*
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | | Bits |
>>>>> Description |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +===+=======+==============================================================+
>>>>>
>>>>> + * | 0 | 31 | ORIGIN =
>>>>> GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC_ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 30:28 | TYPE =
>>>>> GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS_ |
>>>>> + * |
>>>>> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> + * | | 27:0 | DATA0 =
>>>>> MBZ |
>>>>> + *
>>>>> +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +#define GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB 0x4506 // FIXME
>>>>> 0x5201
>>>>
>>>> Same comment for the FIXME as above
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_LEN
>>>>> (GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_MIN_LEN + 1u)
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_0_MBZ
>>>>> GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_1_MBZ (0xfffff << 12)
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_1_TYPE (0xf << 8)
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_1_MBZ2 (0xff << 0)
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB_RESPONSE_MSG_LEN
>>>>> GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_MIN_LEN
>>>>> +#define HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB_RESPONSE_MSG_0_MBZ
>>>>> GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_0_DATA0
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/* legacy definitions */
>>>>> +
>>>>> enum intel_guc_action {
>>>>> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEFAULT = 0x0,
>>>>> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REQUEST_PREEMPTION = 0x2,
>>>>> diff --git
>>>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
>>>>> index c2a069a78e01..127b256a662c 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
>>>>> @@ -112,10 +112,6 @@ static_assert(sizeof(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc)
>>>>> == 64);
>>>>> * - **flags**, holds various bits to control message handling
>>>>> */
>>>>> -/* Type of command transport buffer */
>>>>> -#define INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_SEND 0x0u
>>>>> -#define INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_RECV 0x1u
>>>>> -
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Definition of the command transport message header (DW0)
>>>>> *
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>>>> index 3241a477196f..6a29be779cc9 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>>>> @@ -103,9 +103,9 @@ void intel_guc_ct_init_early(struct intel_guc_ct
>>>>> *ct)
>>>>> static inline const char *guc_ct_buffer_type_to_str(u32 type)
>>>>> {
>>>>> switch (type) {
>>>>> - case INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_SEND:
>>>>> + case GUC_CTB_TYPE_HOST2GUC:
>>>>> return "SEND";
>>>>> - case INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_RECV:
>>>>> + case GUC_CTB_TYPE_GUC2HOST:
>>>>> return "RECV";
>>>>> default:
>>>>> return "<invalid>";
>>>>> @@ -136,25 +136,33 @@ static void guc_ct_buffer_init(struct
>>>>> intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb,
>>>>> guc_ct_buffer_reset(ctb);
>>>>> }
>>>>> -static int guc_action_register_ct_buffer(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>>>> - u32 desc_addr,
>>>>> - u32 type)
>>>>> +static int guc_action_register_ct_buffer(struct intel_guc *guc, u32
>>>>> type,
>>>>> + u32 desc_addr, u32 buff_addr, u32 size)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - u32 action[] = {
>>>>> - INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER,
>>>>> - desc_addr,
>>>>> - sizeof(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc),
>>>>> - type
>>>>> + u32 request[HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_LEN] = {
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST) |
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST) |
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION,
>>>>> GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB),
>>>>
>>>> IMO we could use a macro or 2 for the HXG header, to avoid all these
>>>> lines, which are hard to read. something like:
>>>>
>>>> GUC_HXG_HEADER(origin, type, data, action) \
>>>> (FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, origin) | \
>>>> FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, type) | \
>>>> FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_DATA0, data) | \
>>>> FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION, action))
>>>>
>>>> H2G_HEADER(type, data, action) \
>>>> GUC_HXG_HEADER(GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST, type, data, action)
>>>>
>>>> and then call
>>>>
>>>> H2G_HEADER(GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST, 0, GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not a blocker.
>>>>
>>>> Daniele
>>>>
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_1_SIZE, size / SZ_4K -
>>>>> 1) |
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_1_TYPE, type),
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_2_DESC_ADDR, desc_addr),
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(HOST2GUC_REGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_3_BUFF_ADDR, buff_addr),
>>>>> };
>>>>> - /* Can't use generic send(), CT registration must go over MMIO */
>>>>> - return intel_guc_send_mmio(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
>>>>> NULL, 0);
>>>>> + GEM_BUG_ON(type != GUC_CTB_TYPE_HOST2GUC && type !=
>>>>> GUC_CTB_TYPE_GUC2HOST);
>>>>> + GEM_BUG_ON(size % SZ_4K);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* CT registration must go over MMIO */
>>>>> + return intel_guc_send_mmio(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request),
>>>>> NULL, 0);
>>>>> }
>>>>> -static int ct_register_buffer(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32
>>>>> desc_addr, u32 type)
>>>>> +static int ct_register_buffer(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 type,
>>>>> + u32 desc_addr, u32 buff_addr, u32 size)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - int err = guc_action_register_ct_buffer(ct_to_guc(ct),
>>>>> desc_addr, type);
>>>>> + int err;
>>>>> + err = guc_action_register_ct_buffer(ct_to_guc(ct), type,
>>>>> + desc_addr, buff_addr, size);
>>>>> if (unlikely(err))
>>>>> CT_ERROR(ct, "Failed to register %s buffer (err=%d)\n",
>>>>> guc_ct_buffer_type_to_str(type), err);
>>>>> @@ -163,14 +171,17 @@ static int ct_register_buffer(struct
>>>>> intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 desc_addr, u32 type)
>>>>> static int guc_action_deregister_ct_buffer(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>>>> u32 type)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - u32 action[] = {
>>>>> - INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER,
>>>>> - CTB_OWNER_HOST,
>>>>> - type
>>>>> + u32 request[HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_LEN] = {
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST) |
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST) |
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION,
>>>>> GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB),
>>>>> + FIELD_PREP(HOST2GUC_DEREGISTER_CTB_REQUEST_MSG_1_TYPE, type),
>>>>> };
>>>>> - /* Can't use generic send(), CT deregistration must go over
>>>>> MMIO */
>>>>> - return intel_guc_send_mmio(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
>>>>> NULL, 0);
>>>>> + GEM_BUG_ON(type != GUC_CTB_TYPE_HOST2GUC && type !=
>>>>> GUC_CTB_TYPE_GUC2HOST);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* CT deregistration must go over MMIO */
>>>>> + return intel_guc_send_mmio(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request),
>>>>> NULL, 0);
>>>>> }
>>>>> static int ct_deregister_buffer(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 type)
>>>>> @@ -258,7 +269,7 @@ void intel_guc_ct_fini(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>>> int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
>>>>> - u32 base, cmds;
>>>>> + u32 base, desc, cmds;
>>>>> void *blob;
>>>>> int err;
>>>>> @@ -274,23 +285,26 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(blob != ct->ctbs.send.desc);
>>>>> /* (re)initialize descriptors */
>>>>> - cmds = base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs.send.cmds, blob);
>>>>> guc_ct_buffer_reset(&ct->ctbs.send);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - cmds = base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs.recv.cmds, blob);
>>>>> guc_ct_buffer_reset(&ct->ctbs.recv);
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Register both CT buffers starting with RECV buffer.
>>>>> * Descriptors are in first half of the blob.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs.recv.desc,
>>>>> blob),
>>>>> - INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_RECV);
>>>>> + desc = base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs.recv.desc, blob);
>>>>> + cmds = base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs.recv.cmds, blob);
>>>>> + err = ct_register_buffer(ct, GUC_CTB_TYPE_GUC2HOST,
>>>>> + desc, cmds, ct->ctbs.recv.size * 4);
>>>>> +
>>>>> if (unlikely(err))
>>>>> goto err_out;
>>>>> - err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base +
>>>>> ptrdiff(ct->ctbs.send.desc, blob),
>>>>> - INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_SEND);
>>>>> + desc = base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs.send.desc, blob);
>>>>> + cmds = base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs.send.cmds, blob);
>>>>> + err = ct_register_buffer(ct, GUC_CTB_TYPE_HOST2GUC,
>>>>> + desc, cmds, ct->ctbs.send.size * 4);
>>>>> +
>>>>> if (unlikely(err))
>>>>> goto err_deregister;
>>>>> @@ -299,7 +313,7 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> err_deregister:
>>>>> - ct_deregister_buffer(ct, INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_RECV);
>>>>> + ct_deregister_buffer(ct, GUC_CTB_TYPE_GUC2HOST);
>>>>> err_out:
>>>>> CT_PROBE_ERROR(ct, "Failed to enable CTB (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(err));
>>>>> return err;
>>>>> @@ -318,8 +332,8 @@ void intel_guc_ct_disable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>>> ct->enabled = false;
>>>>> if (intel_guc_is_fw_running(guc)) {
>>>>> - ct_deregister_buffer(ct, INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_SEND);
>>>>> - ct_deregister_buffer(ct, INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_RECV);
>>>>> + ct_deregister_buffer(ct, GUC_CTB_TYPE_HOST2GUC);
>>>>> + ct_deregister_buffer(ct, GUC_CTB_TYPE_GUC2HOST);
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>
>>>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list