[PATCH] dma-buf: fix and rework dma_buf_poll
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Thu Jun 17 17:34:21 UTC 2021
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 01:21:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Daniel pointed me towards this function and there are multiple obvious problems
> in the implementation.
>
> First of all the retry loop is not working as intended. In general the retry
> makes only sense if you grab the reference first and then check the retry. Then
> we skipped checking the exclusive fence when shared fences were present. And
> last the whole implementation was unnecessary complex and rather hard to
> understand which could lead to probably unexpected behavior of the IOCTL.
>
> Fix all this by reworking the implementation from scratch.
Can't we split this a bit?
The other thing I'm wondering, instead of open-coding this and breaking
our heads trying to make sure we got it right. Can't we reuse
dma_resv_get_fences? That's what a lot of drivers use already to get a
consistent copy of the fence set without holding the lock.
I think then the actual semantics, i.e. do we need to include the
exclusive fence or not, stick out more.
-Daniel
>
> Only mildly tested and needs a thoughtful review of the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 132 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
> include/linux/dma-buf.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 511fe0d217a0..1bd00e18291f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry)
> * If you hit this BUG() it means someone dropped their ref to the
> * dma-buf while still having pending operation to the buffer.
> */
> - BUG_ON(dmabuf->cb_shared.active || dmabuf->cb_excl.active);
> + BUG_ON(dmabuf->cb_in.active || dmabuf->cb_out.active);
>
> dmabuf->ops->release(dmabuf);
>
> @@ -206,12 +206,15 @@ static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
>
> static __poll_t dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
> {
> + struct dma_buf_poll_cb_t *dcb;
> struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> struct dma_resv *resv;
> struct dma_resv_list *fobj;
> struct dma_fence *fence_excl;
> - __poll_t events;
> unsigned shared_count, seq;
> + struct dma_fence *fence;
> + __poll_t events;
> + int r, i;
>
> dmabuf = file->private_data;
> if (!dmabuf || !dmabuf->resv)
> @@ -225,99 +228,70 @@ static __poll_t dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
> if (!events)
> return 0;
>
> + dcb = events & EPOLLOUT ? &dmabuf->cb_out : &dmabuf->cb_in;
> +
> + /* Only queue a new one if we are not still waiting for the old one */
> + spin_lock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
> + if (dcb->active)
> + events = 0;
> + else
> + dcb->active = events;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
> + if (!events)
> + return 0;
> +
> retry:
> seq = read_seqcount_begin(&resv->seq);
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> fobj = rcu_dereference(resv->fence);
> - if (fobj)
> + if (fobj && events & EPOLLOUT)
> shared_count = fobj->shared_count;
> else
> shared_count = 0;
> - fence_excl = dma_resv_excl_fence(resv);
> - if (read_seqcount_retry(&resv->seq, seq)) {
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - goto retry;
> - }
>
> - if (fence_excl && (!(events & EPOLLOUT) || shared_count == 0)) {
> - struct dma_buf_poll_cb_t *dcb = &dmabuf->cb_excl;
> - __poll_t pevents = EPOLLIN;
> -
> - if (shared_count == 0)
> - pevents |= EPOLLOUT;
> -
> - spin_lock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
> - if (dcb->active) {
> - dcb->active |= pevents;
> - events &= ~pevents;
> - } else
> - dcb->active = pevents;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
> -
> - if (events & pevents) {
> - if (!dma_fence_get_rcu(fence_excl)) {
> - /* force a recheck */
> - events &= ~pevents;
> - dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
> - } else if (!dma_fence_add_callback(fence_excl, &dcb->cb,
> - dma_buf_poll_cb)) {
> - events &= ~pevents;
> - dma_fence_put(fence_excl);
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * No callback queued, wake up any additional
> - * waiters.
> - */
> - dma_fence_put(fence_excl);
> - dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) {
> + fence = rcu_dereference(fobj->shared[i]);
> + fence = dma_fence_get_rcu(fence);
> + if (!fence || read_seqcount_retry(&resv->seq, seq)) {
> + /* Concurrent modify detected, force re-check */
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + goto retry;
> }
> - }
>
> - if ((events & EPOLLOUT) && shared_count > 0) {
> - struct dma_buf_poll_cb_t *dcb = &dmabuf->cb_shared;
> - int i;
> -
> - /* Only queue a new callback if no event has fired yet */
> - spin_lock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
> - if (dcb->active)
> - events &= ~EPOLLOUT;
> - else
> - dcb->active = EPOLLOUT;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
> -
> - if (!(events & EPOLLOUT))
> + r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &dcb->cb, dma_buf_poll_cb);
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
> + if (!r) {
> + /* Callback queued */
> + events = 0;
> goto out;
> + }
> + }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) {
> - struct dma_fence *fence = rcu_dereference(fobj->shared[i]);
> -
> - if (!dma_fence_get_rcu(fence)) {
> - /*
> - * fence refcount dropped to zero, this means
> - * that fobj has been freed
> - *
> - * call dma_buf_poll_cb and force a recheck!
> - */
> - events &= ~EPOLLOUT;
> - dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
> - break;
> - }
> - if (!dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &dcb->cb,
> - dma_buf_poll_cb)) {
> - dma_fence_put(fence);
> - events &= ~EPOLLOUT;
> - break;
> - }
> + fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(resv);
> + if (fence) {
> + fence = dma_fence_get_rcu(fence);
> + if (!fence || read_seqcount_retry(&resv->seq, seq)) {
> + /* Concurrent modify detected, force re-check */
> dma_fence_put(fence);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + goto retry;
> +
> }
>
> - /* No callback queued, wake up any additional waiters. */
> - if (i == shared_count)
> - dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
> + r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &dcb->cb, dma_buf_poll_cb);
> + dma_fence_put(fence_excl);
> + if (!r) {
> + /* Callback queued */
> + events = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> + /* No callback queued, wake up any additional waiters. */
> + dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
> +
> out:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return events;
> @@ -562,8 +536,8 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(const struct dma_buf_export_info *exp_info)
> dmabuf->owner = exp_info->owner;
> spin_lock_init(&dmabuf->name_lock);
> init_waitqueue_head(&dmabuf->poll);
> - dmabuf->cb_excl.poll = dmabuf->cb_shared.poll = &dmabuf->poll;
> - dmabuf->cb_excl.active = dmabuf->cb_shared.active = 0;
> + dmabuf->cb_in.poll = dmabuf->cb_out.poll = &dmabuf->poll;
> + dmabuf->cb_in.active = dmabuf->cb_out.active = 0;
>
> if (!resv) {
> resv = (struct dma_resv *)&dmabuf[1];
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> index efdc56b9d95f..7e747ad54c81 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
> wait_queue_head_t *poll;
>
> __poll_t active;
> - } cb_excl, cb_shared;
> + } cb_in, cb_out;
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list