[PATCH 0/5] ti-sn65dsi83: Finalize transition to atomic operations

Robert Foss robert.foss at linaro.org
Tue Jun 22 08:28:44 UTC 2021


Applied to drm-misc-next


On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 20:49, Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:55:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch series is based on top of "[PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83:
> > Replace connector format patching with atomic_get_input_bus_fmts". It
> > completes the transition to atomic operations in the ti-sn65dsi83
> > driver. The main reason for this change is patch 4/5 that fixes a few
> > issues in the driver (see the patch's commit message for details), but
> > overall it also brings the driver to the most recent API which is nice
> > in itself.
> >
> > Laurent Pinchart (5):
> >   drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Move LVDS format selection to .mode_set()
> >   drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Pass mode explicitly to helper functions
> >   drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Switch to atomic operations
> >   drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Retrieve output format from bridge state
> >   drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Retrieve the display mode from the state
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 166 +++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>
> I have browsed the series and it all looked good.
> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
>
> on them all.
>
> It is news to me that the atomic ops are the way to go - but then I have
> been off-line for a while so no suprise or maybe I just missed it
> before.
>
> It would be good if the comments in drm_bridge.h could point out what is
> deprecated, so we know what to avoid in new and updated bridge drivers.
> But this is all un-related to this series.
>
>         Sam


More information about the dri-devel mailing list