[PATCH 10/12] dt-bindings: media: rockchip-vpu: Add PX30 compatible

[Alex Bee]

Hi Ezequiel,

Am 26.06.21 um 02:47 schrieb Ezequiel Garcia:
> Hey Dafna,
>
> Thanks a lot for reviewing this.
>
> On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 12:21 +0300, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 24.06.21 21:26, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> From: Paul Kocialkowski<paul.kocialkowski at bootlin.com>
>>>
>>> The Rockchip PX30 SoC has a Hantro VPU that features a decoder (VDPU2)
>>> and an encoder (VEPU2).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski<paul.kocialkowski at bootlin.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia<ezequiel at collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml | 3 +++
>>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
>>> index b88172a59de7..3b9c5aa91fcc 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
>>> @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ properties:
>>>          - items:
>>>              - const: rockchip,rk3228-vpu
>>>              - const: rockchip,rk3399-vpu
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - const: rockchip,px30-vpu
>>> +          - const: rockchip,rk3399-vpu
>> This rk3399 compatible is already mentioned in the last 'items' list, should we add it again?
>>
> What we are mandating here is that "rockchip,px30-vpu" can only be used
> with "rockchip,rk3399-vpu".
>
> I.e.:
>
>    compatible = "rockchip,px30-vpu", "rockchip,rk3399-vpu";
>
So why not making the already existing to:

       - items:
           - enum:
               - rockchip,px30-vpu
               - rockchip,rk3228-vpu
           - const: rockchip,rk3399-vpu

Alex