[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Update execbuf IOCTL to accept N BBs

[Matthew Brost]

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 05:13:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 10:30:49AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Add I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_* to drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2.flags which allows
> > submitting N BBs per IOCTL.
> > 
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > Cc: Tony Ye <tony.ye at intel.com>
> > CC: Carl Zhang <carl.zhang at intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> > Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> 
> I dropped my big question on the previous patch already, I'll check this
> out again when it's all squashed into the parallel extension patch so we
> have everything in one commit.

I think we just drop this and only allow N BBs per IOCTL as discussed in patch
#2 of this series.

Matt

> -Daniel
> 
> > ---
> >  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > index 0175b12b33b8..d3072cad4a7e 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > @@ -1291,7 +1291,26 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 {
> >   */
> >  #define I915_EXEC_USE_EXTENSIONS	(1 << 21)
> >  
> > -#define __I915_EXEC_UNKNOWN_FLAGS (-(I915_EXEC_USE_EXTENSIONS << 1))
> > +/*
> > + * Number of BB in execbuf2 IOCTL - 1, used to submit more than BB in a single
> > + * execbuf2 IOCTL.
> > + *
> > + * Return -EINVAL if more than 1 BB (value 0) is specified if
> > + * I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_PARALLEL_SUBMIT hasn't been called on the gem
> > + * context first. Also returns -EINVAL if gem context has been setup with
> > + * I915_PARALLEL_NO_PREEMPT_MID_BATCH and the number BBs not equal to the total
> > + * number hardware contexts in the gem context.
> > + */
> > +#define I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_LSB		(22)
> > +#define I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_MASK	(0x3f << I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_LSB)
> > +#define I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_MSB		(27)
> > +#define i915_execbuffer2_set_number_bb(eb2, num_bb) \
> > +	(eb2).flags = ((eb2).flags & ~I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_MASK) | \
> > +	(((num_bb - 1) << I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_LSB) & I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_MASK)
> > +#define i915_execbuffer2_get_number_bb(eb2) \
> > +	((((eb2).flags & I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_MASK) >> I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_LSB) + 1)
> > +
> > +#define __I915_EXEC_UNKNOWN_FLAGS (-(1 << (I915_EXEC_NUMBER_BB_MSB + 1)))
> >  
> >  #define I915_EXEC_CONTEXT_ID_MASK	(0xffffffff)
> >  #define i915_execbuffer2_set_context_id(eb2, context) \
> > -- 
> > 2.28.0
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch