[PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: panel: Introduce a panel-lvds binding

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Fri Nov 19 22:48:58 UTC 2021


Hi Maxime,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:35:03PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Following the previous patch, let's introduce a generic panel-lvds
> binding that documents the panels that don't have any particular
> constraint documented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime at cerno.tech>
> ---
>  .../bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml    | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f6ce8e29391e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Generic LVDS Display Panel Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj at bp.renesas.com>
> +  - Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com>
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: panel-common.yaml#
> +  - $ref: lvds.yaml#
> +
> +select:
> +  properties:
> +    compatible:
> +      contains:
> +        const: panel-lvds
> +
> +  not:
> +    properties:
> +      compatible:
> +        contains:
> +          enum:
> +              - advantech,idk-1110wr
> +              - innolux,ee101ia-01d
> +              - mitsubishi,aa104xd12
> +              - mitsubishi,aa121td01
> +              - sgd,gktw70sdae4se

This will be annoying to maintain, I'm pretty sure authors will forget
to update this file when adding bindings for other panels. Is there any
way we could select this binding with a positive rule instead of a
negative rule ?

> +
> +  required:
> +    - compatible
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    items:
> +      - enum:
> +          - auo,b101ew05
> +          - tbs,a711-panel
> +
> +      - const: panel-lvds
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - data-mapping
> +  - width-mm
> +  - height-mm
> +  - panel-timing
> +  - port
> +
> +...

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


More information about the dri-devel mailing list