[PATCH 03/28] dma-buf: make fence mandatory for dma_resv_add_excl_fence v2
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Nov 30 09:03:38 UTC 2021
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:06:34PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Calling dma_resv_add_excl_fence() with the fence as NULL and expecting
> that that this frees up the fences is simply abuse of the internals of
> the dma_resv object.
>
> v2: drop the fence pruning completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Cursory look says you got them all, and it's definitely the right thing to
do.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> index ff3c0558b3b8..4deea75c0b9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> @@ -305,8 +305,7 @@ void dma_resv_add_excl_fence(struct dma_resv *obj, struct dma_fence *fence)
> if (old)
> i = old->shared_count;
>
> - if (fence)
> - dma_fence_get(fence);
> + dma_fence_get(fence);
>
> write_seqcount_begin(&obj->seq);
> /* write_seqcount_begin provides the necessary memory barrier */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list