[PATCH RFC 2/2] drm: introduce CLOSEFB IOCTL

[Simon Ser]

Thanks for having a look at this patch, Pekka!

On Friday, October 8th, 2021 at 09:29, Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com> wrote:

> > +#define DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CLOSEFB		DRM_IOWR(0xCF, unsigned int)
>
> Should it have a structure with 'flags' for future-proofing?
>
> ISTR some rule of thumb that everything new must have 'flags' field
> enforced to be zero just in case. I only now saw that RMFB cannot have
> flags.

I wonder. I don't mind adding a struct with flags or padding, not sure what the
policy is for the DRM subsystem.