[PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: mediatek, dp: Add Display Port binding

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann]

Hi Rob,

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 07:43:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:46:19AM +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > This controller is present on several mediatek hardware. Currently
> > mt8195 and mt8395 have this controller without a functional difference,
> > so only one compatible field is added.
> > 
> > The controller can have two forms, as a normal display port and as an
> > embedded display port.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
> > ---
> >  .../display/mediatek/mediatek,dp.yaml         | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dp.yaml
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dp.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f7a35962c23b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dp.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,dp.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Mediatek Display Port Controller
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - CK Hu <ck.hu at mediatek.com>
> > +  - Jitao shi <jitao.shi at mediatek.com>
> > +
> > +description: |
> > +  Device tree bindings for the Mediatek (embedded) Display Port controller
> > +  present on some Mediatek SoCs.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - mediatek,mt8195-edp_tx
> > +      - mediatek,mt8195-dp_tx
> 
> Are these blocks different?

Good point, the registers of these blocks are described in its own
chapter each. Also I do need to distinguish between both in the driver.
Would you suggest making this distinction differently or keep it as two
compatibles?

> 
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  interrupts:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    items:
> > +      - description: faxi clock
> > +
> > +  clock-names:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: faxi
> > +
> > +  power-domains:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  ports:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> > +    properties:
> > +      port at 0:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > +        description: Input endpoint of the controller, usually dp_intf
> > +
> > +      port at 1:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > +        description: Output endpoint of the controller
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +  - interrupts
> > +  - ports
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/power/mt8195-power.h>
> > +    dp_tx: edp_tx at 1c500000 {
> > +        compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-edp_tx";
> > +        reg = <0 0x1c500000 0 0x8000>;
> > +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 676 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> > +        power-domains = <&spm MT8195_POWER_DOMAIN_EPD_TX>;
> > +        pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +        pinctrl-0 = <&edp_pin>;
> > +        status = "okay";
> 
> Don't show status in examples.

Fixed.

Thank you Rob.

Best,
Markus

> 
> > +
> > +        ports {
> > +            #address-cells = <1>;
> > +            #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +            port at 0 {
> > +                reg = <0>;
> > +                edp_in: endpoint {
> > +                    remote-endpoint = <&dp_intf0_out>;
> > +                };
> > +            };
> > +            port at 1 {
> > +                reg = <1>;
> > +                edp_out: endpoint {
> > +                	remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
> > +                };
> > +            };
> > +        };
> > +    };
> > -- 
> > 2.33.0
> > 
> >