[PATCH v3 05/16] drm/panel-simple-edp: Split eDP panels out of panel-simple

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:42 AM Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple-edp.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,1298 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2013, NVIDIA Corporation.  All rights reserved.
> > + *
> > + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> > + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
> > + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
> > + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sub license,
> > + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> > + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> > + *
> > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the
> > + * next paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions
> > + * of the Software.
> > + *
> > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> > + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
> > + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
> > + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> > + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
> > + * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> > + */
> Would be nice if you could use the SPDX thingy for the license.

I'm going to leave this alone. I definitely started this driver by
copy-pasting the panel-simple.c file and it still shares a lot of
lines of code with that driver. It feels like that qualifies for the
"substantial portions of the Software" portion which tells me to
retain the license. I also kept Thierry as the author since, again,
it's really a splitting of the existing driver and not the creation of
a new driver. In fact, if I were to assign a new author/license to
panel-edp, one could also make the argument that I should assign a new
author/license to panel-simple. panel-simple got ~50% of the old
panels and panel-edp got the other ~50% of the old panels plus a
search-and-replace of "simple" for "edp" and some code deletion. I
don't think search-and-replace name change nor code deletion is
justification for claiming authorship. ;-)

If Thierry wants to chime in and say that I should put down a
different license for either of the two files, though, I'd be glad to
change it.

-Doug