[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: rename debugfs_gt files

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Tue Sep 14 15:02:40 UTC 2021


On Tue, 14 Sep 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:16:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>On Wed, 08 Sep 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com> wrote:
>>> We shouldn't be using debugfs_ namespace for this functionality. Rename
>>> debugfs_gt.[ch] to intel_gt_debugfs.[ch] and then make functions,
>>> defines and structs follow suit.
>>>
>>> While at it and since we are renaming the header, sort the includes
>>> alphabetically.
>>
>>I didn't do a detailed review, maybe someone should, but superficially
>>seems good. On the series,
>>
>>Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>
> thanks. What about the question I raised on
>
> intel_gt_register_debugfs() vs
> intel_gt_debugfs_register()?
>
> and
>
> intel_gt_pm_register_debugfs() vs
> intel_gt_pm_debugfs_register()?
>
> what would be prefered here?

Nowadays I try to juggle the function names to have the prefix match the
filename. I think the driver has grown so big that we need that to help
with our mental model of what goes where. Beyond that, whatever flows
more naturally when you say it out aloud.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center


More information about the dri-devel mailing list