[PATCH v5 09/13] drm/i915/ttm: add tt shmem backend
Thomas Hellström
thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Wed Sep 29 11:07:56 UTC 2021
On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 12:41 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> For cached objects we can allocate our pages directly in shmem. This
> should make it possible(in a later patch) to utilise the existing
> i915-gem shrinker code for such objects. For now this is still
> disabled.
Some minor comments below, with those either fixed or deemed
unnecessary,
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>
> v2(Thomas):
> - Add optional try_to_writeback hook for objects. Importantly we
> need
> to check if the object is even still shrinkable; in between us
> dropping the shrinker LRU lock and acquiring the object lock it
> could for
> example have been moved. Also we need to differentiate between
> "lazy" shrinking and the immediate writeback mode. Also later we
> need to
> handle objects which don't even have mm.pages, so bundling this
> into
> put_pages() would require somehow handling that edge case, hence
> just letting the ttm backend handle everything in
> try_to_writeback
> doesn't seem too bad.
> v3(Thomas):
> - Likely a bad idea to touch the object from the unpopulate hook,
> since it's not possible to hold a reference, without also
> creating
> circular dependency, so likely this is too fragile. For now just
> ensure we at least mark the pages as dirty/accessed when called
> from the
> shrinker on WILLNEED objects.
> - s/try_to_writeback/shrinker_release_pages, since this can do more
> than just writeback.
> - Get rid of do_backup boolean and just set the SWAPPED flag prior
> to
> calling unpopulate.
> - Keep shmem_tt as lowest priority for the TTM LRU bo_swapout walk,
> since
> these just get skipped anyway. We can try to come up with
> something
> better later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 8 +
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c | 14 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 17 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 240
> ++++++++++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
>
...
> +
> + err = dma_map_sg_attrs(i915_tt->dev,
> + st->sgl, st->nents,
> + PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
nit: Since this is a dma api call, should we use DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
instead of PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL? DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL is used elsewhere
in this file, but not throughout the driver IIRC.
> + DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC |
> + DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING |
> + DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN);
> + if (err <= 0) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_free_st;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + for_each_sgt_page(page, sgt_iter, st)
> + ttm->pages[i++] = page;
> +
> + if (ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED)
> + ttm->page_flags &= ~TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED;
> +
> + i915_tt->cached_st = st;
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_free_st:
> + shmem_free_st(st, filp->f_mapping, false, false);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void i915_ttm_tt_shmem_unpopulate(struct ttm_tt *ttm)
> +{
> + struct i915_ttm_tt *i915_tt = container_of(ttm,
> typeof(*i915_tt), ttm);
> + bool backup = ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED;
> +
> + dma_unmap_sg(i915_tt->dev, i915_tt->cached_st->sgl,
> + i915_tt->cached_st->nents,
> + PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
Same here.
> +
> + shmem_free_st(fetch_and_zero(&i915_tt->cached_st),
> + file_inode(i915_tt->filp)->i_mapping,
> + backup, backup);
> +}
> +
> static struct ttm_tt *i915_ttm_tt_create(struct ttm_buffer_object
> *bo,
> uint32_t page_flags)
> {
> struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
> ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, bo->resource->mem_type);
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo);
> + enum ttm_caching caching = i915_ttm_select_tt_caching(obj);
> struct i915_ttm_tt *i915_tt;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -196,36 +279,62 @@ static struct ttm_tt *i915_ttm_tt_create(struct
> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> man->use_tt)
> page_flags |= TTM_TT_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC;
>
> - ret = ttm_tt_init(&i915_tt->ttm, bo, page_flags,
> - i915_ttm_select_tt_caching(obj));
> - if (ret) {
> - kfree(i915_tt);
> - return NULL;
> + if (i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj) && caching ==
> ttm_cached) {
> + page_flags |= TTM_TT_FLAG_EXTERNAL |
> + TTM_TT_FLAG_EXTERNAL_MAPPABLE;
> + i915_tt->is_shmem = true;
> }
>
> + ret = ttm_tt_init(&i915_tt->ttm, bo, page_flags, caching);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free;
> +
> i915_tt->dev = obj->base.dev->dev;
>
> return &i915_tt->ttm;
> +
> +err_free:
> + kfree(i915_tt);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int i915_ttm_tt_populate(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> + struct ttm_tt *ttm,
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + struct i915_ttm_tt *i915_tt = container_of(ttm,
> typeof(*i915_tt), ttm);
> +
> + if (i915_tt->is_shmem)
> + return i915_ttm_tt_shmem_populate(bdev, ttm, ctx);
> +
> + return ttm_pool_alloc(&bdev->pool, ttm, ctx);
> }
>
> static void i915_ttm_tt_unpopulate(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct
> ttm_tt *ttm)
> {
> struct i915_ttm_tt *i915_tt = container_of(ttm,
> typeof(*i915_tt), ttm);
>
> - if (i915_tt->cached_st) {
> - dma_unmap_sgtable(i915_tt->dev, i915_tt->cached_st,
> - DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, 0);
> - sg_free_table(i915_tt->cached_st);
> - kfree(i915_tt->cached_st);
> - i915_tt->cached_st = NULL;
> + if (i915_tt->is_shmem) {
> + i915_ttm_tt_shmem_unpopulate(ttm);
> + } else {
> + if (i915_tt->cached_st) {
> + dma_unmap_sgtable(i915_tt->dev, i915_tt-
> >cached_st,
> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, 0);
> + sg_free_table(i915_tt->cached_st);
> + kfree(i915_tt->cached_st);
> + i915_tt->cached_st = NULL;
> + }
> + ttm_pool_free(&bdev->pool, ttm);
> }
> - ttm_pool_free(&bdev->pool, ttm);
> }
>
> static void i915_ttm_tt_destroy(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct
> ttm_tt *ttm)
> {
> struct i915_ttm_tt *i915_tt = container_of(ttm,
> typeof(*i915_tt), ttm);
>
> + if (i915_tt->filp)
> + fput(i915_tt->filp);
> +
> ttm_tt_fini(ttm);
> kfree(i915_tt);
> }
> @@ -235,6 +344,14 @@ static bool i915_ttm_eviction_valuable(struct
> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> {
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo);
>
> + /*
> + * EXTERNAL objects should never be swapped out by TTM,
> instead we need
> + * to handle that ourselves. TTM will already skip such
> objects for us,
> + * but we would like to avoid grabbing locks for no good
> reason.
> + */
> + if (bo->ttm && bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_EXTERNAL)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> /* Will do for now. Our pinned objects are still on TTM's LRU
> lists */
> return i915_gem_object_evictable(obj);
> }
> @@ -328,9 +445,11 @@ static void
> i915_ttm_adjust_gem_after_move(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, cache_level);
> }
>
> -static void i915_ttm_purge(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> +static int __i915_ttm_purge(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> {
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
> + struct i915_ttm_tt *i915_tt =
> + container_of(bo->ttm, typeof(*i915_tt), ttm);
> struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {
> .interruptible = true,
> .no_wait_gpu = false,
> @@ -339,17 +458,79 @@ static void i915_ttm_purge(struct
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> int ret;
>
> if (obj->mm.madv == __I915_MADV_PURGED)
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> - /* TTM's purge interface. Note that we might be reentering.
> */
> ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, &place, &ctx);
> - if (!ret) {
> - obj->write_domain = 0;
> - obj->read_domains = 0;
> - i915_ttm_adjust_gem_after_move(obj);
> - i915_ttm_free_cached_io_st(obj);
> - obj->mm.madv = __I915_MADV_PURGED;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (bo->ttm && i915_tt->filp) {
> + /*
> + * The below fput(which eventually calls
> shmem_truncate) might
> + * be delayed by worker, so when directly called to
> purge the
> + * pages(like by the shrinker) we should try to be
> more
> + * aggressive and release the pages immediately.
> + */
> + shmem_truncate_range(file_inode(i915_tt->filp),
> + 0, (loff_t)-1);
> + fput(fetch_and_zero(&i915_tt->filp));
> + }
> +
> + obj->write_domain = 0;
> + obj->read_domains = 0;
> + i915_ttm_adjust_gem_after_move(obj);
> + i915_ttm_free_cached_io_st(obj);
> + obj->mm.madv = __I915_MADV_PURGED;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void i915_ttm_purge(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> +{
> + __i915_ttm_purge(obj);
Do we need a comment here as to why we choose to ignore the return
value? I typically use a void cast (void)__i915_ttm_purge(obj); to
indicate that ignoring the return value is intentional. Not sure if
that's common practice with i915?
> +}
> +
> +static int i915_ttm_shrinker_release_pages(struct
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> + bool should_writeback)
> +{
> + struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
> + struct i915_ttm_tt *i915_tt =
> + container_of(bo->ttm, typeof(*i915_tt), ttm);
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {
> + .interruptible = true,
> + .no_wait_gpu = false,
> + };
> + struct ttm_placement place = {};
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!bo->ttm || bo->resource->mem_type != TTM_PL_SYSTEM)
> + return 0;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_tt->is_shmem);
> +
> + if (!i915_tt->filp)
> + return 0;
> +
> + switch (obj->mm.madv) {
> + case I915_MADV_DONTNEED:
> + return __i915_ttm_purge(obj);
> + case __I915_MADV_PURGED:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED)
> + return 0;
> +
> + bo->ttm->page_flags |= TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED;
> + ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, &place, &ctx);
> + if (ret) {
> + bo->ttm->page_flags &= ~TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED;
> + return ret;
> }
> +
> + if (should_writeback)
> + __shmem_writeback(obj->base.size, i915_tt->filp-
> >f_mapping);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void i915_ttm_swap_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> @@ -618,6 +799,7 @@ static unsigned long i915_ttm_io_mem_pfn(struct
> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>
> static struct ttm_device_funcs i915_ttm_bo_driver = {
> .ttm_tt_create = i915_ttm_tt_create,
> + .ttm_tt_populate = i915_ttm_tt_populate,
> .ttm_tt_unpopulate = i915_ttm_tt_unpopulate,
> .ttm_tt_destroy = i915_ttm_tt_destroy,
> .eviction_valuable = i915_ttm_eviction_valuable,
> @@ -685,12 +867,17 @@ static int __i915_ttm_get_pages(struct
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> }
>
> if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) {
> + struct i915_ttm_tt *i915_tt =
> + container_of(bo->ttm, typeof(*i915_tt), ttm);
> +
> /* Object either has a page vector or is an iomem
> object */
> st = bo->ttm ? i915_ttm_tt_get_st(bo->ttm) : obj-
> >ttm.cached_io_st;
> if (IS_ERR(st))
> return PTR_ERR(st);
>
> __i915_gem_object_set_pages(obj, st,
> i915_sg_dma_sizes(st->sgl));
> + if (!bo->ttm || !i915_tt->is_shmem)
> + i915_gem_object_make_unshrinkable(obj);
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -770,6 +957,8 @@ static void i915_ttm_put_pages(struct
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> static void i915_ttm_adjust_lru(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> {
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
> + struct i915_ttm_tt *i915_tt =
> + container_of(bo->ttm, typeof(*i915_tt), ttm);
>
> /*
> * Don't manipulate the TTM LRUs while in TTM bo destruction.
> @@ -782,7 +971,10 @@ static void i915_ttm_adjust_lru(struct
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> * Put on the correct LRU list depending on the MADV status
> */
> spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> - if (obj->mm.madv != I915_MADV_WILLNEED) {
> + if (bo->ttm && i915_tt->filp) {
> + /* Try to keep shmem_tt from being considered for
> shrinking. */
> + bo->priority = TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY - 1;
> + } else if (obj->mm.madv != I915_MADV_WILLNEED) {
> bo->priority = I915_TTM_PRIO_PURGE;
> } else if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) {
> if (bo->priority < I915_TTM_PRIO_HAS_PAGES)
> @@ -887,9 +1079,12 @@ static const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops
> i915_gem_ttm_obj_ops = {
> .get_pages = i915_ttm_get_pages,
> .put_pages = i915_ttm_put_pages,
> .truncate = i915_ttm_purge,
> + .shrinker_release_pages = i915_ttm_shrinker_release_pages,
> +
> .adjust_lru = i915_ttm_adjust_lru,
> .delayed_free = i915_ttm_delayed_free,
> .migrate = i915_ttm_migrate,
> +
> .mmap_offset = i915_ttm_mmap_offset,
> .mmap_ops = &vm_ops_ttm,
> };
> @@ -937,7 +1132,6 @@ int __i915_gem_ttm_object_init(struct
> intel_memory_region *mem,
> drm_gem_private_object_init(&i915->drm, &obj->base, size);
> i915_gem_object_init(obj, &i915_gem_ttm_obj_ops, &lock_class,
> flags);
> i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(obj, mem);
> - i915_gem_object_make_unshrinkable(obj);
> INIT_RADIX_TREE(&obj->ttm.get_io_page.radix, GFP_KERNEL |
> __GFP_NOWARN);
> mutex_init(&obj->ttm.get_io_page.lock);
> bo_type = (obj->flags & I915_BO_ALLOC_USER) ?
> ttm_bo_type_device :
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list