[Freedreno] [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for the eDP panel over aux_bus

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 14/04/2022 23:00, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> Hi Dmitry
> 
> On 4/14/2022 12:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
>>> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
>>>> <quic_sbillaka at quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
>>>>>
>>>>> These changes are dependent on the following series:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=* 
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
>>>> What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
>>>> Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not,
>>>> maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
>>>> at the beginning of your series?
>>>
>>> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as
>>> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
>>> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
>>>
>>> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
>>> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also be 
>>> good.
>>>
>>
>> Can you resend those as not RFC?
> 
> Yes, please resend these, I can ack them.
> 
> Previously I held off my ack, as kuogee ran into some issues testing 
> them which was later concluded to be a mismatch in QC internal trees due 
> to different versions of the changes.( another reason why we should get 
> these landed ).
> 
> Now, that Sankeerth has tested these, if you can remove RFC and post 
> them, I can ack the.

Well, you can ack those patches without them being resent. You have 
already added your Reviewed-by to first three patches (which were merged 
during last window).


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry