[Freedreno] [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for the eDP panel over aux_bus

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 14/04/2022 23:19, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/14/2022 1:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 14/04/2022 23:00, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>> Hi Dmitry
>>>
>>> On 4/14/2022 12:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
>>>>> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
>>>>>> <quic_sbillaka at quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These changes are dependent on the following series:
>>>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=* 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
>>>>>> What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
>>>>>> Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If 
>>>>>> not,
>>>>>> maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
>>>>>> at the beginning of your series?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are 
>>>>> marked as
>>>>> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
>>>>> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
>>>>>
>>>>> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
>>>>> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also 
>>>>> be good.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you resend those as not RFC?
>>>
>>> Yes, please resend these, I can ack them.
>>>
>>> Previously I held off my ack, as kuogee ran into some issues testing 
>>> them which was later concluded to be a mismatch in QC internal trees 
>>> due to different versions of the changes.( another reason why we 
>>> should get these landed ).
>>>
>>> Now, that Sankeerth has tested these, if you can remove RFC and post 
>>> them, I can ack the.
>>
>> Well, you can ack those patches without them being resent. You have 
>> already added your Reviewed-by to first three patches (which were 
>> merged during last window).
>>
> I thought you might have to rebase them :) that way you could have 
> resent the rebased patch with the RFC tag removed.
> 
> If you dont, you now have my R-b.

Thank you!

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry