[RFC 0/4] Separate wb_idx and intf_idx in dpu_encoder

[Abhinav Kumar]

As promised here [1], this is a follow up change to separate out
wb_idx and intf_idx for better clarity in dpu_encoder.

This also helps to easily handle boards which do not have a physical
display but can still be validated using writeback interface.

In addition, this also takes care of adding wb_idx to existing DRM prints
and traces.

Currently posting this as a RFC to get feedback on this approach and if
the reviews are positive, I can easily absorb this in the DPU writeback
series [2]

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/482637/?series=99724&rev=2#comment_868460
[2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99724/#rev3

Abhinav Kumar (4):
  drm/msm/dpu: introduce a wb_idx to be used for writeback interfaces
  drm/msm/dpu: start using wb_idx in dpu_encoder_phys_wb
  drm/msm/dpu: add wb_idx to existing DRM prints in dpu_encoder
  drm/msm/dpu: add wb_idx to DRM traces in dpu_encoder

 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c        | 125 +++++++++++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h   |   4 +
 .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c    |  10 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h             |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_trace.h          |  26 +++--
 5 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4