[PATCH] drm/ssd130x: Make ssd130x_remove() return void
Javier Martinez Canillas
javierm at redhat.com
Tue Apr 26 07:33:46 UTC 2022
Hello Uwe,
Thanks for your patch.
On 4/25/22 21:23, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> This function returns zero unconditionally, so there isn't any benefit
> of returning a value. Make it return void to be able to see at a glance
> that the return value of ssd130x_i2c_remove() is always zero.
>
> This patch is a preparation for making i2c remove callbacks return void.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> ---
Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm at redhat.com>
and I'll push to drm-misc (drm-misc-next) now.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list