[PATCH] drm: handle kernel fences in drm_gem_plane_helper_prepare_fb
Thomas Zimmermann
tzimmermann at suse.de
Thu Apr 28 07:50:00 UTC 2022
Hi
Am 28.04.22 um 09:32 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 28.04.22 um 09:23 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>> [SNIP]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_atomic_helper.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_atomic_helper.c
>>> index a6d89aed0bda..8fc0b42acdff 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_atomic_helper.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_atomic_helper.c
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>>> #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
>>> +#include <linux/dma-fence-chain.h>
>>> #include <drm/drm_atomic_state_helper.h>
>>> #include <drm/drm_atomic_uapi.h>
>>> @@ -141,25 +142,67 @@
>>> * See drm_atomic_set_fence_for_plane() for a discussion of
>>> implicit and
>>
>> This comment still refers to the function you just deleted. Maybe the
>> deleted docs could be integrated here somehow, if still relevant?
>
> Yeah, Daniel point that out as well.
>
>>
>>> * explicit fencing in atomic modeset updates.
>>> */
>>> -int drm_gem_plane_helper_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, struct
>>> drm_plane_state *state)
>>> +int drm_gem_plane_helper_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>> + struct drm_plane_state *state)
>>
>> We have a 100-character limit. Please leave this on the same line.
>
> Despite some efforts to change this that is still documented as
> 80-character limit:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.18-rc4/process/coding-style.html#breaking-long-lines-and-strings
But didn't checkpatch stop warning about the 80-char limit?
>
>
>>
>>> {
>>> + struct dma_fence *fence = dma_fence_get(state->fence);
>>> struct drm_gem_object *obj;
>>
>> I'd declare this variable within the for loop.
>>
>>> - struct dma_fence *fence;
>>> + enum dma_resv_usage usage;
>>> + size_t i;
>>> int ret;
>>> if (!state->fb)
>>> return 0;
>>> - obj = drm_gem_fb_get_obj(state->fb, 0);
>>> - ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(obj->resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE,
>>> &fence);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - return ret;
>>> -
>>> - /* TODO: drm_atomic_set_fence_for_plane() should be changed to
>>> be able
>>> - * to handle more fences in general for multiple BOs per fb.
>>> + /*
>>> + * Only add the kernel fences here if there is already a fence
>>> set via
>>> + * explicit fencing interfaces on the atomic ioctl.
>>> + *
>>> + * This way explicit fencing can be used to overrule implicit
>>> fencing,
>>> + * which is important to make explicit fencing use-cases work: One
>>> + * example is using one buffer for 2 screens with different refresh
>>> + * rates. Implicit fencing will clamp rendering to the refresh
>>> rate of
>>> + * the slower screen, whereas explicit fence allows 2 independent
>>> + * render and display loops on a single buffer. If a driver allows
>>> + * obeys both implicit and explicit fences for plane updates,
>>> then it
>>> + * will break all the benefits of explicit fencing.
>>> */
>>> - drm_atomic_set_fence_for_plane(state, fence);
>>> + usage = fence ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL : DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(state->fb->obj); ++i) {
>>
>> Instead of ARRAY_SIZE, rather use state->fb->format->num_planes. It's
>> the number of planes (i.e., GEM objects) in the framebuffer.
>>
>>> + struct dma_fence *new;
>>> +
>>> + obj = drm_gem_fb_get_obj(state->fb, i);
>>> + if (!obj)
>>
>> With the use of num_planes in the for loop, there should probably be a
>> drm_WARN_ON_ONCE() around this test.
>>
>>> + continue;
>>
>> goto error handling.
>>
>> Or is there a use case for framebuffers with empty planes? At least
>> it's not possible to instantiate one via drm_gem_fb_init_with_funcs().
>>
>
> I was asking myself the same thing, but found this handling be used at
> other places as well.
I've gradually changed the code towards the use of num_planes and
stricter error reporting. IMHO at some point, we should warn about
empty plane BOs directly within drm_gem_fb_get_obj().
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Thanks for taking a look,
> Christian.
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20220428/be60da49/attachment.sig>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list