[PATCH] tty: vt: selection: Add check for valid tiocl_selection values

[Helge Deller]

Hello Jiri,

Thanks for looking into this patch!

On 8/4/22 07:47, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 30. 07. 22, 20:49, Helge Deller wrote:
>> The line and column numbers for the selection need to start at 1.
>> Add the checks to prevent invalid input.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller at gmx.de>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+14b0e8f3fd1612e35350 at syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/selection.c b/drivers/tty/vt/selection.c
>> index f7755e73696e..58692a9b4097 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/selection.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/selection.c
>> @@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ static int vc_selection(struct vc_data *vc, struct tiocl_selection *v,
>>           return 0;
>>       }
>>
>> +    if (!v->xs || !v->ys || !v->xe || !v->ye)
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure about this. It potentially breaks userspace (by
> returning EINVAL now).

Right.
According to the code below, my interpretation is that all xs/ys/xe/ye values
should be > 0. But of course I might be wrong on this, as I didn't find any
documentation for TIOCL_SETSEL.

And if userspace tries to set an invalid selection (e.g. by selecting row 0),
my patch now returns -EINVAL, while it returned success before.

> And the code below should handle this just fine, right:
>>       v->xs = min_t(u16, v->xs - 1, vc->vc_cols - 1);
>>       v->ys = min_t(u16, v->ys - 1, vc->vc_rows - 1);
>>       v->xe = min_t(u16, v->xe - 1, vc->vc_cols - 1);

It "handles it fine" in the sense that it can cope with the
input and will not crash.
But it returns (maybe?) unexpected results...

For example, if a user selects row 0 (where I assume he wanted to set
the first line), he instead selects the last row.
I'm not sure if this is the expected behaviour.

Do you know of any userspace program which breaks because of this?

Helge