[PATCH v2 06/11] dt-bindings: display/msm: move qcom, sc7180-mdss schema to mdss.yaml
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Tue Aug 23 11:00:53 UTC 2022
On 22/08/2022 22:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> required:
>>> - compatible
>>> - reg
>>> @@ -177,7 +204,19 @@ patternProperties:
>>> # TODO: add reference once the mdp5 is converted
>>>
>>> "^display-controller@(0|[1-9a-f][0-9a-f]*)$":
>>> - $ref: dpu-sdm845.yaml
>>> + oneOf:
>>> + - $ref: dpu-sc7180.yaml
>>> + - $ref: dpu-sdm845.yaml
>>
>> I don't think this is good approach. These are strictly tied, so you
>> should have rather per SoC MDSS schema pulling in:
>> 1. common MDSS
>> 2. specific children schemas
>>
>> This makes it quite obvious and specific. Your setup now allows putting
>> sc7180-dpu under sdm845-dpu.
>
> Then we should probably also use very specific $ref and compat check for
> all other entries in this file too. I understand your concern, however
> I'd prefer to have the working schema which is not tight enough compared
> to set of schema files that completely do not work.
Why they cannot be tight and working?
> And current
> dpu-*yaml do not work as they allow just the display-controller beneath
> the mdss node.
Sure, this can be fixed but not really in a relaxing way.
>
> If you absolutely insist on me making the binding tight enough, I'll
> rework the bindings to clearly specify which SoC has which nodes.
I do not see the drawbacks of specific/tight approach, so yes, please
make it tight.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list