[PATCH v2 4/7] regulator: core: Allow specifying an initial load w/ the bulk API

[Yongqin Liu]

Hi, Douglas

On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 22:50, Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:23 PM Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Douglas
> >
> > Just an update on the fix you pointed out previously here:
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809142738.1.I91625242f137c707bb345c51c80c5ecee02eeff3@changeid
> >
> > With it I could boot the hikey960 build to the home screen if it does
> > not use the GKI kernel.
> > but the problem will be reproduced if it uses the GKI kernel.
> >
> > And if this change is reverted, then it could boot with the GKI kernel as well.
> >
> > I am not sure what's the reason there, but there seems to be some
> > difference with the fix above and the workaround of revert.
> > Not sure if you have any idea about that.
> >
> > Regarding the GKI kernel(Android Generic Kernel Image)[2], it's built
> > from the android-mainline tree(f51334eac4de) without any workaround.
> > (Neither the revert, nor the fix applied), and the regulator modules
> > used for the hikey960 build are hi6421v530-regulator.ko and
> > hi655x-regulator.ko
> >
> > I am still not sure if it would work with the GKI kernel that has the
> > fix that you pointed out in. the case that both the GKI kernel and
> > vendor tree have the fix.
> > Will update here when I have some results.

Just checked, with the fix applied in the GKI kernel, the problem is
not reproduced again.

> > [2]: https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/kernel/generic-kernel-image?hl=en
>
> That's not too surprising. The broken patch is in the core kernel so
> you need the fix in the core kernel.
Sorry, I still do not get the point here.

The GKI kernel is the same one, that does not have the revert and the
fix applied.

for the vendor tree(the ko files and dtb files are used)
#1 built with this commit reverted.
#2 built with the fix applied.

#1 could boot with the GKI kernel, while #2 does not boot with the same error.
What might cause the difference?

> I think that means you'll have to
> wait until `android-mainline` gets the fix. I don't work on Android,
> so if there's some other route to get an expedited fix into
> android-mainline I'm not aware of it.

Thanks, I will wait for the fix to be merged into the android-mainline,
before that I will use the revert workaround for the moment.

-- 
Best Regards,
Yongqin Liu
---------------------------------------------------------------
#mailing list
linaro-android at lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android