[PATCH 2/2] adreno: Detect shutdown during get_param()
Rob Clark
robdclark at gmail.com
Thu Dec 1 19:33:40 UTC 2022
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 10:42 AM Joel Fernandes <joel at joelfernandes.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 6:35 PM Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 1:28 PM Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo at quicinc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/12/2022 1:19 AM, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > > Even though the GPU is shut down, during kexec reboot we can have userspace
> > > > still running. This is especially true if KEXEC_JUMP is not enabled, because we
> > > > do not freeze userspace in this case.
> > > >
> > > > To prevent crashes, track that the GPU is shutdown and prevent get_param() from
> > > > accessing GPU resources if we find it shutdown.
> > > >
> > > > This fixes the following crash during kexec reboot on an ARM64 device with adreno GPU:
> > > >
> > > > [ 292.534314] Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt
> > > > [ 292.534323] Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev3 - 8) with LTE (DT)
> > > > [ 292.534326] Call trace:
> > > > [ 292.534328] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1d4
> > > > [ 292.534337] show_stack+0x20/0x2c
> > > > [ 292.534342] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x78
> > > > [ 292.534347] dump_stack+0x18/0x38
> > > > [ 292.534352] panic+0x148/0x3b0
> > > > [ 292.534357] nmi_panic+0x80/0x94
> > > > [ 292.534364] arm64_serror_panic+0x70/0x7c
> > > > [ 292.534369] do_serror+0x0/0x7c
> > > > [ 292.534372] do_serror+0x54/0x7c
> > > > [ 292.534377] el1h_64_error_handler+0x34/0x4c
> > > > [ 292.534381] el1h_64_error+0x7c/0x80
> > > > [ 292.534386] el1_interrupt+0x20/0x58
> > > > [ 292.534389] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24
> > > > [ 292.534395] el1h_64_irq+0x7c/0x80
> > > > [ 292.534399] local_daif_inherit+0x10/0x18
> > > > [ 292.534405] el1h_64_sync_handler+0x48/0xb4
> > > > [ 292.534410] el1h_64_sync+0x7c/0x80
> > > > [ 292.534414] a6xx_gmu_set_oob+0xbc/0x1fc
> > > > [ 292.534422] a6xx_get_timestamp+0x40/0xb4
> > > > [ 292.534426] adreno_get_param+0x12c/0x1e0
> > > > [ 292.534433] msm_ioctl_get_param+0x64/0x70
> > > > [ 292.534440] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe8/0x158
> > > > [ 292.534448] drm_ioctl+0x208/0x320
> > > > [ 292.534453] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x98/0xd0
> > > > [ 292.534461] invoke_syscall+0x4c/0x118
> > > > [ 292.534467] el0_svc_common+0x98/0x104
> > > > [ 292.534473] do_el0_svc+0x30/0x80
> > > > [ 292.534478] el0_svc+0x20/0x50
> > > > [ 292.534481] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x78/0x108
> > > > [ 292.534485] el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
> > > > [ 292.534632] Kernel Offset: 0x1a5f800000 from 0xffffffc008000000
> > > > [ 292.534635] PHYS_OFFSET: 0x80000000
> > > > [ 292.534638] CPU features: 0x40018541,a3300e42
> > > > [ 292.534644] Memory Limit: none
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org>
> > > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org>
> > > > Cc: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda at chromium.org>
> > > > Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler at kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel at joelfernandes.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 1 +
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h | 3 +++
> > > > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > > > index f0cff62812c3..03d912dc0130 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > > > @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ static void adreno_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > {
> > > > struct msm_gpu *gpu = dev_to_gpu(&pdev->dev);
> > > >
> > > > + gpu->is_shutdown = true;
> > > > WARN_ON_ONCE(adreno_system_suspend(&pdev->dev));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > > > index 382fb7f9e497..6903c6892469 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > > > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ int adreno_get_param(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_file_private *ctx,
> > > > struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > > >
> > > > /* No pointer params yet */
> > > > - if (*len != 0)
> > > > + if (*len != 0 || gpu->is_shutdown)
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > This will race with shutdown. Probably, propagating back the return
> > > value of pm_runtime_get() in every possible ioctl call path is the right
> > > thing to do.
> > >
> > > I have never thought about this scenario. Do you know why userspace is
> > > not freezed before kexec?
> >
> > So userspace not being frozen seems like the root issue, and is likely
> > to cause all sorts of other whack-a-mole problems. I guess I'd like
> > to know if this is the expected behavior?
>
> We tried that. Freezing before kexec seems to cause issues for ALSA as
> Ricardo found:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202211281209.mnBLzQ2I-lkp@intel.com/T/
>
> That patch is still TBD due to disagreement on the right approach to
> fix, so I don't think freezing before shutting down devices is viable
> at the moment.
>
> I am checking Ricardo if we can do something like util-linux's
> shutdown code which sends SIGTERM to all processes:
> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux/+/v2.8/login-utils/shutdown.c#273
> , before issuing the kexec-reboot.
>
> Maybe, a more graceful shutdown from kexec-lite, will prevent the
> kexec-reboot it does from crashing? Though in my view that would still
> be a small copout instead of fixing the real issue, which is the
> kernel crashing for any reason.
The problem is that pm_runtime_force_suspend() yanks the rug out from
under the driver from a runpm PoV.. generally this is ok (as long as
scheduler kthread is parked) because we don't have to worry about
userspace ;-)
> > If so, we should probably look at
> > drm_dev_is_unplugged()/drm_dev_unplug()/etc rather than trying to NIH
> > that mechanism. We would need to sprinkle drm_dev_is_unplugged()
> > checks more widely, and also ensure that the scheduler kthread(s) gets
> > parked. But it would be nice to know first if we are just trying to
> > paper over a kexec bug.
>
> Agreed. I think we still patch 1/2 whether the SIGTERM trick mentioned
> above, works or not. I will await discussions with Ricardo before
> reposting that one.
Yeah, I think I'm waiting on a v2 of that one ;-)
BR,
-R
> Cheers,
>
> -- Joel
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list