[PATCH v3 0/2] drm/imx/lcdc: Implement DRM driver for imx21
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Sat Dec 17 18:38:06 UTC 2022
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 05:57:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 06:50:04PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> >
> > - added allOf as Krzysztof requested
> > - reworked driver based on Philipp's comments
> > (improved error handling, different selects, moved driver to a subdirectory,
> > header sorting, drm_err instead of DRM_ERROR, inlined
> > imx_lcdc_check_mode_change, make use of dev_err_probe())
> >
> > Krzysztof also pointed out that we're now having two compatibles for a
> > single hardware. Admittedly this is unusual, but this is the chance that
> > the (bad) compatible identifier imx21-fb gets deprecated. The hardware
> > is called LCDC and only the linux (framebuffer) driver is called imxfb.
>
> The problem is you can't have firmware (with the DTB) that supports
> both. Well, you can if you want to have some firmware setting that
> selects which one. Otherwise, it's really an OS problem to decide what
> to use.
I don't understand what you intend to say here. The same applies if the
compatible is the same for both binding alternatives, isn't it? Do you
consider a firmware problem better or an OS problem?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20221217/1dd0354b/attachment.sig>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list