[PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

[Alex Deucher]

Applied the series.  Thanks!

Alex

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:33 AM Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>
> I think so, Alex will probably pick that up.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> Am 08.02.22 um 09:28 schrieb zhanglianjie:
> > I am very sorry that I submitted many times due to the character
> > coding problem. Can PATCH V4 be used?
> >
> >> I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?
> >>
> >> That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is
> >> going wrong here :)
> >>
> >> Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >> Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
> >>> after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call
> >>> radeon_bo_kunmap before the function returns.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie at uniontech.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> >>> index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> >>> @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
> >>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
> >>>       handle = msg[2];
> >>>
> >>>       if (handle == 0) {
> >>> +        radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
> >>>           DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
> >>>           return -EINVAL;
> >>>       }
> >>> @@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
> >>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
> >>>           return 0;
> >>>
> >>>       default:
> >>> -
> >>>           DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
> >>> -        return -EINVAL;
> >>>       }
> >>>
> >>> -    BUG();
> >>> +    radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
> >>>       return -EINVAL;
> >>>   }
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.20.1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>