[PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add support for eDP panel on CRD
Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
quic_sbillaka at quicinc.com
Wed Feb 9 07:15:15 UTC 2022
Hi Bjorn,
1. I will change the edp_out label to mdss_edp_out.
2. The "pm8350c_pwm" node is part of the dependent series mentioned in the cover letter. Below is the patch for the same:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/1637917920-22041-4-git-send-email-quic_c_skakit@quicinc.com/
3. I will move the edp_backlight and edp_panel nodes to the root.
Thank you,
Sankeerth
-----Original Message-----
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson at linaro.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 5:23 AM
To: Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) <quic_sbillaka at quicinc.com>
Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org; freedreno at lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; agross at kernel.org; robh+dt at kernel.org; robdclark at gmail.com; seanpaul at chromium.org; swboyd at chromium.org; dianders at chromium.org; krzysztof.kozlowski at canonical.com; thierry.reding at gmail.com; sam at ravnborg.org; airlied at linux.ie; daniel at ffwll.ch; quic_kalyant <quic_kalyant at quicinc.com>; Abhinav Kumar (QUIC) <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com>; Kuogee Hsieh (QUIC) <quic_khsieh at quicinc.com>; quic_mkrishn <quic_mkrishn at quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add support for eDP panel on CRD
On Tue 08 Feb 07:18 PST 2022, Sankeerth Billakanti wrote:
> Enable the eDP display panel support without HPD on sc7280 platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka at quicinc.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - sort node references alphabetically
> - improve readability
> - move the pwm pinctrl to pwm node
> - move the regulators to root
> - define backlight power
> - remove dummy regulator node
> - cleanup pinctrl definitions
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 2 -
> 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> index e2efbdd..bff2707 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> @@ -21,6 +21,34 @@
> chosen {
> stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> };
> +
> + backlight_power: backlight-power {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "backlight_power";
> +
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> +
> + gpio = <&pm8350c_gpios 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + enable-active-high;
> +
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_power>;
> + };
> +
> + edp_power: edp-power {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "edp_power";
> +
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +
> + gpio = <&tlmm 80 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + enable-active-high;
> +
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&edp_panel_power>;
> + };
> };
>
> &apps_rsc {
> @@ -76,6 +104,42 @@ ap_ts_pen_1v8: &i2c13 {
> };
> };
>
> +&edp_out {
Sorry for missing this while merging changes in sc7280.dtsi. But it would be really nice if this was labeled mdss_edp_out instead (or possibly defined within the &mdss_edp node).
Now you will have &edp_out and &dp_out floating around away from the edp and dp nodes...
> + remote-endpoint = <&edp_panel_in>;
> +};
> +
> +&mdss {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&mdss_edp {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + vdda-1p2-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>;
> + vdda-0p9-supply = <&vreg_l10c_0p8>;
> +};
> +
> +&mdss_edp_phy {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + vdda-1p2-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>;
> + vdda-0p9-supply = <&vreg_l10c_0p8>;
> +};
> +
> +&mdss_dp {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hot_plug_det>;
> + data-lanes = <0 1>;
> + vdda-1p2-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>;
> + vdda-0p9-supply = <&vreg_l1b_0p8>;
> +};
> +
> +&mdss_mdp {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> &nvme_3v3_regulator {
> gpio = <&tlmm 51 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> };
> @@ -84,7 +148,65 @@ ap_ts_pen_1v8: &i2c13 {
> pins = "gpio51";
> };
>
> +&pm8350c_pwm {
This label doesn't exist, so I won't be able to merge this patch.
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_pwm>;
> +};
> +
> +&pm8350c_gpios {
> + edp_bl_power: edp-bl-power {
> + pins = "gpio7";
> + function = "normal";
> + qcom,drive-strength = <PMIC_GPIO_STRENGTH_LOW>;
> + bias-disable;
> + output-low;
> + };
> +
> + edp_bl_pwm: edp-bl-pwm {
> + pins = "gpio8";
> + function = "func1";
> + qcom,drive-strength = <PMIC_GPIO_STRENGTH_LOW>;
> + bias-disable;
> + output-low;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&soc {
> + edp_backlight: edp-backlight {
> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
This is not a device on the mmio bus, so it should not love within the &soc.
> +
> + power-supply = <&backlight_power>;
> + pwms = <&pm8350c_pwm 3 65535>;
> + };
> +
> + edp_panel: edp_panel {
Ditto.
Regards,
Bjorn
> + compatible = "sharp,lq140m1jw46";
> +
> + power-supply = <&edp_power>;
> + backlight = <&edp_backlight>;
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + port at 0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + edp_panel_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&edp_out>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> &tlmm {
> + edp_panel_power: edp-panel-power {
> + pins = "gpio80";
> + function = "gpio";
> + bias-pull-down;
> + };
> +
> tp_int_odl: tp-int-odl {
> pins = "gpio7";
> function = "gpio";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 3572399..f8fa716 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -3012,8 +3012,6 @@
>
> mdss_edp: edp at aea0000 {
> compatible = "qcom,sc7280-edp";
> - pinctrl-names = "default";
> - pinctrl-0 = <&edp_hot_plug_det>;
>
> reg = <0 0xaea0000 0 0x200>,
> <0 0xaea0200 0 0x200>,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list