[PATCH] devcoredump: increase the device delete timeout to 10 mins
Abhinav Kumar
quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com
Sat Feb 12 07:52:41 UTC 2022
Hi Greg
On 2/11/2022 11:04 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:59:39AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Greg
>>
>> Thanks for the response.
>>
>> On 2/11/2022 3:09 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:44:32AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>> There are cases where depending on the size of the devcoredump and the speed
>>>> at which the usermode reads the dump, it can take longer than the current 5 mins
>>>> timeout.
>>>>
>>>> This can lead to incomplete dumps as the device is deleted once the timeout expires.
>>>>
>>>> One example is below where it took 6 mins for the devcoredump to be completely read.
>>>>
>>>> 04:22:24.668 23916 23994 I HWDeviceDRM::DumpDebugData: Opening /sys/class/devcoredump/devcd6/data
>>>> 04:28:35.377 23916 23994 W HWDeviceDRM::DumpDebugData: Freeing devcoredump node
>>>
>>> What makes this so slow? Reading from the kernel shouldn't be the
>>> limit, is it where the data is being sent to?
>>
>> We are still checking this. We are seeing better read times when we bump up
>> the thread priority of the thread which was reading this.
>
> Where is the thread sending the data to?
The thread is writing the data to a file in local storage. From our
profiling, the read is the one taking the time not the write.
>
>> We are also trying to check if bumping up CPU speed is helping.
>> But, results have not been consistently good enough. So we thought we should
>> also increase the timeout to be safe.
>
> Why would 10 minutes be better than 30? What should the limit be? :)
Again, this is from our profiling. We are seeing a worst case time of 7
mins to finish the read for our data. Thats where the 10mins came from.
Just doubling what we have currently. I am not sure how the current 5
mins timeout came from.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list